Women need equal access to insurance benefits

While I have no intent to debate the Catholic Church’s policies towards family planning with Bishop Edward J. Burns in the context of a Letter to the Editor, I am compelled, however, to respond to the Bishop’s highly-charged opinion piece in the Feb. 5 Juneau Empire.

 

The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Service’s announcement on Jan. 20 that so outraged the bishop requires health insurance providers to fully cover costs of contraception and is consistent with existing laws in 28 states. This new federal rule specifically exempts churches from the requirement to offer such health insurance, a fact that Burns did not mention. Additionally, this policy offers other religious organizations, such as hospitals and universities that serve the general public and employ people regardless of their faith, a year to prepare for the new law.


See Also


So why should a worker at Anchorage’s Providence Hospital, a religiously-affiliated organization and the state’s largest private employer in 2010, not share the same insurance benefits regarding contraceptives that a worker at, say, a large grocery store chain has? The federal policy does NOT require anyone to use contraceptives nor does it require any health care provider to prescribe contraceptives. It does, however, give women who want to use contraceptives a big help with the cost of this critical family-planning option.

The bishop goes far afield with his verbiage regarding attacks on religious freedom and the faithful’s rights. Should a woman not have the freedom and right, regardless of her economic situation, to access family planning services? Are such services only for those who can afford it?

My travels to India, Guatemala, and other developing countries — and indeed, my observations here in the U.S. — reveal that incredible improvements can be made in the quality of people’s lives by simply allowing all women access to education and to family planning. The government’s decision of Jan. 20 has nothing to do with restricting religious liberty, human rights, or changing “divinely established truths.” as the bishop so dramatically states. Lastly, I would suggest that the bishop, while he may profess that human rights come from God, only has to look as far as Rwanda, Chechnya, Tibet, Sudan, or Guatemala to realize that these rights depend upon governments to defend them.

Susan Schrader

Juneau

More

Tue, 05/23/2017 - 07:22

To Sealaska shareholders: Support Taug for board of directors

The purpose of this letter is to encourage Sealaska shareholders to support Karen Taug for election to the board of directors. I am doing so... Read more

Tue, 05/23/2017 - 07:22

Develop Alaska’s natural resources

While the U.S. is distracted by North Korea and the Middle East, Russia is quietly developing Siberia and laying claim to large areas under the... Read more

Answering questions on mining ordinance proposal

Answering questions on mining ordinance proposal

Read more

Car buyers in rural Alaska can face recall reimbursement issues

Rural Alaska buyer beware: I am writing this letter to inform people in rural Alaska about the difficulties encountered when trying to get a manufacturer... Read more

Around the Web

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING