In opposition to Ballot Measure 2, which would establish an Alaska Coastal Management Program, opponents are spending big industry bucks.
Basically, their message is it’s too complicated, there is too much uncertainty, it gives too much say to non-professionals (regular folks) and it’s just plain bad for business.
What it will do is allow Alaskans, again, regular folks, who are living in coastal communities affected by large-scale development a voice at the table. Their concerns should be a part of any big decision that would directly impact livelihoods and quality of life.
Covering all the bases and considering the consensus of affected communities sounds like responsible development to me.
Roy Smith
Juneau




Comments (1)
Add commentRoy
Too much regulatory power to those like SEACC is the concern that many have. Now I'm not saying that SEACC has a seat at the table, (yet) but who knows who will be invited & once seated what mechanism is in place to remove an entity who's only goal is to obstruct & stall progress (which is the SEACC history) devils in the details. & this proposal is week in details.