Negative effects of the higher national debt on long term economic growth

Today I opened the Juneau Empire to yet another article on the potential effects of “sequestration,” that is, across the board federal spending cuts, on Alaska. The discussion focused only on what borrowed dollars will not be spent and on which federal programs. Absent from this article, and most other recent news reporting on the subject, is the negative effects of an increase in our national debt on our long-term economic growth.

The point is simple. “Oh my fur and whiskers,” a few millions more borrowed dollars will not be spent. No question, we will all suffer a little now. Some of our non-combat civilian Department of Defense employees may be furloughed a day a week. Maybe a few less drones will fly. Maybe a few less airport security folks will grope at us during our travels. Maybe a few less teachers, a few less police, a bit less unemployment benefits paid. Yes, indiscriminate spending reductions are not the best way to do it. Moreover, reduced federal spending now will affect us all.

That is the bad news. But what is the good news? Reduced federal spending and borrowing will also benefit us — not now, but in the future. Less debt means less future debt service and interest; more money for investment and spending in the future. Huh! Delayed gratification. You’ve read about those childhood psychology studies, the ones that prove that kids who are willing to wait for two pieces of candy at the end of the week fair way better in life academically and economically than those who take the one piece today. Well, guess what, the same is true for a society as a whole. We and our children will experience far better economic growth in the future if we reduce deficit spending now and pay better attention to our national debt.

Chuck Cohen

Juneau

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING

 

More

Still bad for Alaska

The few changes to Senate health care bill (done again in secret) do nothing to make it less bad in general and especially bad for... Read more

Better care for whom?

The Senate is considering a repeal/replace bill for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) called the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA), and I say, better care... Read more

Planned Parenthood saved my life

When I was 23 years old, Planned Parenthood saved my life. I had just graduated from college and was starting my career. My job did... Read more

23 million Americans would lose health care

Dear U.S. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan,

Read more