• Overcast, light rain
  • 48°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Legislators eyeing special session to save Coastal Management

Two-day session could happen next week; save 33 jobs, some say

Posted: May 24, 2011 - 10:31pm

Legislators fearing the loss of the state’s Coastal Management program are trying to get an agreement from other legislators to call themselves into special session in order save the state’s voice in outer continental shelf and other ocean matters.

Support from 40 of the Legislature’s 60 members is needed for the Legislature to call itself into special session.

Several key legislators say they believe there is enough support among their colleagues for the Legislature to call itself back to Juneau for the year’s second special session.

“I don’t think anyone wanted (Coastal Management) to go away,” said House Speaker Mike Chenault, R-Nikiski, who cast a key vote against it on the session’s acrimonious final day.

Possible dates for a special session could be next Tuesday and Wednesday, he said. Holding such a session quickly would be a key to both avoiding conflicts legislators have, as well as keeping the issue separate from possible gubernatorial budget vetoes.

The key to a successful special session, and even the decision to have one in the first place, would be to reach an agreement on the program beforehand, said Rep. Bob Herron, D-Bethel, a member of the House Majority led by Chenault and a main negotiator on the coastal issue.

“We’re not going to go down there blind,” he said.

“We have to have an understanding what would be the basis for coming back,” he said.

Herron said he thinks an agreement can be reached, as does House Minority Leader Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau.

Herron and Kerttula were House members of the conference committee that reached a compromise agreement between the House and Senate versions of the Coastal Management bill on the special session’s final day.

The state’s coastal management program is scheduled to sunset at the end of June unless renewed, but a bill to reauthorize the program failed after coastal legislators tried to restore local communities’ voice in the process, while Gov. Sean Parnell resisted giving up any state authority to local interests he said were attempting to obtain a “veto” over development. Parnell may have heightened tensions again recently when he likened senators to snakes in comments to the Alaska Miners Association in Juneau.

The conference committee’s compromise bill was approved 14-5 in the Senate, but failed 20-15 in the House. Twenty-one votes in the 40-member body were required for passage.

Chenault said he’d support having a special session to reauthorize coastal management if an agreement could be reached that addresses the concerns that led to its failure in the House.

“I’m for trying to make the program work, as long as it does work for the state,” he said.

The House’s abrupt adjournment three days before the end of the last 30-day special session was a successful maneuver to force the Senate to adopt its version of the state’s capital budget without changes, or leave Alaska without billions in projects.

That gambit was successful, the Senate adopted the House’s budget, but the House’s quick adjournment meant the end of Coastal Management negotiations and apparent end of the program.

Now, Kerttula said, with that issue out of the way it may be possible to reach an agreement on Coastal Management, and save the 33 jobs scheduled to be lost at the end of next month.

“I think the budget play was paramount,” she said, and a focus on what’s about to be lost will likely lead to another special session.

“I want this program not to be lost, and I think we’ve got a good shot at it,” she said, especially if Chenault gets behind it.

Chenault said the Legislature was very close to reaching an agreement when the session adjourned, but it got caught up in bad feelings between some of the parties in the stress of budget and other negotiations.

“I think the pieces were there at the end of the sessions,” he said.

“If cooler heads prevail now I think we might be able to put something place that keeps Coastal Management and has input from local communities,” he said.

Senate leaders were unavailable for comment Tuesday, but have been highly supportive of Coastal Management.

• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (4)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
wren
87
Points
wren 05/25/11 - 09:08 am
0
0

The Big Picture...

Good faith, bad faith, the real losers in this are us Alaskans.

Coastal Management was a great program, one stop shopping to secure permits rather than bouncing from one agency to another. An organization may have to go to DNR, F&G & DEC, then through a municipality, then back to DEC, then DNR and F&G and around in circles just to get a single permit. Coastal Management acted as an advocate for the organization applying for the permit. Get approved by one agency, denied by another, and back and forth, that is what we are back to. Isn't this how all government should be? Shouldn't we eliminate the red tape rather than bouncing from one department to another, being able to get the job done by working with one agency? Coastal Management is the model for how government should function but rather than adopt its processes throughout our government whether it be Resources, Community and Economic Development, Health and Human Services, any public service office, we scrap it. This is bad for businesses and therefore bad for Alaskans.

Government should offer a streamline process that is customer service oriented. But all too often government forgets its customers, the citizens of the State. And how many times has one government agency referred you to another agency? One stop shopping eliminates passing the buck. But of course, why would government ever have a program that makes any sense?

chipthoma
7
Points
chipthoma 05/26/11 - 06:20 am
0
0

Don't Bet The Farm

The chance of legislators returning to Juneau against the wishes of Big Oil, miners and Parnell is pretty slim. Alaska could have had coastal zone mgt. with one vote a few weeks ago, but the developers chose not to ask.

Jo MacNamara
132
Points
Jo MacNamara 05/25/11 - 12:11 pm
0
0
Alaskastu
52
Points
Alaskastu 05/25/11 - 12:39 pm
0
0

Miners, big oil and parnell

Miners, big oil and parnell have nothing to do with this. They can call themselves back and nothing can stop that. What do miners have against coastal issues? They're permits dont have anything to do with it. Or are you just lumping all the things you label as bad into one group?

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376083/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375478/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376058/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375998/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375678/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/374383/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375278/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376063/
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-523-2295
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING