One of Alaska’s most notorious companies is back in the state, but with a new public face.
And it’s now hoping to build the $180 million Cascade Creek Hydroelectric Project, nearly as big as Juneau’s Snettisham Power Project, on the mainland across from Petersburg.
Alaska Hydro Corp., a publicly traded company officially based in Vancouver and listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, has spent millions on the project already. It hopes to build a project big enough to make it financially feasible to connect to Canada and the West Coast power grid, and then spur new hydro development throughout Southeast.
“Once you are connected to the grid, you will never turn on another diesel plant again,” said Thom Fischer, president of Alaska Hydro.
The 70-megawatt Cascade Creek Project, he said, will produce power with water that flows from Swan Lake down Cascade Creek into Thomas Bay, and give a boost to Southeast development.
What’s causing controversy about the Cascade Creek Project is not only what the project’s developer is planning to do, but also who the developer is.
In 2002, Bellingham, Wash., construction company Whitewater Engineering was working on another hydroelectric project, for Cordova, when it sent equipment operator Gary Stone to work in an known avalanche chute. An avalanche killed him, and Stone left behind a wife and two children.
The Occupational Health and Safety Administration called the company’s actions “criminally negligent.” State prosecutors agreed, and both Whitewater and owner Thom Fischer were indicted on charges of criminally negligent homicide.
Fisher disputed the charges, blaming Stone and government regulations for the death. He eventually agreed to plead guilty to the charges on behalf of Whitewater in exchange for the charge against him personally being dismissed.
The statewide notoriety came in the very final days of the administration of former Gov. Frank Murkowski, who pardoned Whitewater and agreed with Fischer that Stone’s death had been a “tragic accident.”
Whitewater had earlier testified before the Legislature on behalf of Murkowski’s pro-development agenda, and said government safety and environmental regulations on the Cordova project were hampering development.
Among the elements of the case that spurred public outrage was that Fischer assured Murkowski that he’d paid his OSHA fine and benefits to Stone’s family.
What he didn’t tell him was that Whitewater had never paid the $150,000 fine it had received as part of its guilty plea. That fine, which had grown with interest to $250,000 by the time of the pardon, was wiped away by Murkowski’s action.
Outraged legislators passed legislation reining in governors’ clemency powers, with Rep. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, the House Democratic leader, joining with Rep. Ralph Samuels, R-Anchorage, its Republican leader, to co-sponsor the legislation.
The bill passed unanimously in both houses of the Legislature, and was quickly signed into law by new Gov. Sarah Palin.
Fischer today calls the pardon “yesterday’s news” and said his company never should have been prosecuted for an accident.
“People who really understand what happened believe he did the right thing, that Murkowski did the right thing,” Fischer said.
Fischer had hired Juneau attorney and former state Rep. Bruce Weyhrauch to pursue the pardon.
After Murkowski granted it, Weyhrauch told the Empire he was “astonished” and donated his legal fee to a charity that serves crime victims.
Whitewater has long been involved with the Cascade Creek Project, which was first developed by an affiliated company, Cascade Creek LLC. That joined the Vancouver-based Alaska Hydro last year in a reverse merger with Fischer as chief executive officer of the merged company.
That project has been controversial locally, with part of the ire stemming from Whitewater and Fischer’s history, said Joe Nelson, superintendent of Petersburg Municipal Light & Power.
“There’s folks here who have long memories and very strong feelings about it,” he said.
And some concern is coming from Alaska Hydro’s business plan, Nelson said.
Fischer said the goal of the Cascade Creek Project is to connect into the electrical intertie between Petersburg, Wrangell and Ketchikan at Petersburg. Nelson said the city doesn’t need the power, doesn’t have a means of connection, and the intertie isn’t able to ship that much power.
Fischer said he initially plans to sell half the power locally, and eventually all of it locally.
“I don’t know who they are going to sell it to,” Nelson responded.
At a meeting in Petersburg recently, Alaska Hydro suggested it might sell power to cruise ships in Ketchikan.
While the power will eventually be sold locally, Fischer said, the Cascade Creek project could also spur construction of the long-sought intertie with the West Coast power grid in Canada.
That’s something the region needs, he said, and Cascade Creek could provide enough power to make construction of an intertie viable.
The problem for the mostly isolated communities in Alaska is that if they build large, efficient hydro projects, they initially have surplus power and have no way to sell it and no way to recoup construction costs until demand grows. Eventually, they wind up with a shortage and the same dilemma all over again.
“That’s the problem with every single power project you build in the state,” Fischer said.
He said Cascade Creek will provide so much surplus power it will finally make it economic to build the intertie to Canada.
“Our project is big enough to push it over the edge,” Fischer said.
And while Petersburg has been skeptical, Alaska Hydro won support from the Wrangell, which invested $250,000 in the company.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (8)
Add commentOutraged Legislators?
Too bad they don't get even a little bit upset about the cost of energy or the lack of affordable transportation,
Sounds like another
Sounds like another "SnettiScam"
This is alarming and fear the
A project of this scope with leaders that:
. were indicted on charges of criminally negligent homicide.
. they believe that Government safety and environmental regulations hamper development
. they also believe that they should not be prosecuted for an accident
Who on earth is working these days to protect the well being of the public anymore?
My concern is also that the real intention here is to sell power to mega mining operations that will work and suck every bit of life out of this region.
INTERTIE
Stevens, before he left congress, set up a trust fund of so many millions for a SE intertie. Unfortunately no one kknow what happened to the trust
Will the real Thom Fischer please step forward?
I am disturbed to see that Mr. Fischer has such high regards for himself; unfortunately, I do not hold him in the same brilliance. My memory of Mr. Fischer is that of a contractor who brought in his parents to live in a trailer on the job site to help with the preliminary grubbing as to save money by not having to hire local laborers to do the work. When the snow started falling, causing the project to slow, Mr. Fischer took out his anger on the crew because it was taking too long to clear the access road to the project. After all, the crew is always to blame for nature and errant project cost bidding. When the avalanche danger became great, Mr. Fischer stated in court records that there was no reason to hire an avalanche expert since he was an “engineer” and engineers are trained and qualified to figure out anything; including avalanche hazards. When Mr. Stone ended up crushed to death by an avalanche after Mr. Fischer instructed Stone to go into harm’s way to walk the excavator out from the job site as to protect the machine, it was Stone’s fault he got killed. Of course, all of that is past history in Fischer's mind. The people of the State of Alaska would be well severed to stand clear of Mr. Fischer and let him do business elsewhere.
Where did it go?
It looks like I might have said some things that got under the skin of someone. I was surprised to see that my post was deleted. It contained true statements so I understand now that the past is not that far back.
Cutting out histrionics and obvious slant - a pretty good story
Although it is understood a controversial person can diminish something they might be advocating, this story reveals some interesting developments occurring in Southeast Alaska - notwithstanding the lack of political support for private sector energy development. First, the Cascade Creek project is moving ahead, quite well unlike many regional public sector energy development proposals. It is progressing despite opposition by the status quo, the private and public electrical utilities in our region.
Despite the controversial past of some and the unwillingness of others to live and let live, a Canadian investment company is investing in the Cascade Creek project. They’re likely not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, but rather principally because it makes economic sense. This is a very good sign for Alaska.
Notwithstanding some territorial issues, the Cascade Creek project has legs and so in moving forward despite an unwelcome (by some) public figure. And it rightly should, because the project makes sense economically.
The PML&P official seems to be quite disingenuous regarding his community’s power circumstance. On one hand they applied for a preliminary FERC permit to study a project also in Thomas Bay called Ruth Lake. Frankly if there was no need for power, then I’d suppose Federal Energy Regulatory Energy Commission might wonder why PML&P had applied for this permit. When a filing is made, a need for power is part of the process – FERC wouldn’t appreciate a frivolous application –so I’m sure PML&P’s manager must be mistaken regarding Petersburg’s power needs.
Despite this obvious contradiction, the manager states that Petersburg doesn’t need the power. He may be technically correct for the moment, however the surplus power that Petersburg and Wrangell had previously enjoyed is rapidly disappearing with conversions to resistance heating from former oil heated homes, government buildings and offices. Also, Ketchikan’s interconnection via the Swan Lake – Tyee Intertie while a good accomplishment is costing Wrangell and Petersburg a healthy margin of energy cushion.
Ketchikan went on diesel generation this spring and that is not a good thing for Ketchikan residents nor Wrangell and Petersburg either. Another disingenuous statement is about the intertie’s ability to move power – its capacity. The Tyee Lake transmission line between Tyee, Wrangell and Petersburg was designed at 138 kV, but was only energized at 69 kV. So yes in it’s present operating state, it can handle half of its designed capacity. So of course, its present operating state – there isn’t sufficient capacity.
I think this article points out some good and bad public policy choices made in the region. Rather than continuing to oppose laudable public policy initiatives such as the AK-BC Intertie proposal our regional electrical utilities ought to get behind a Canadian interconnect for a number of good reasons.
Had municipal utilities been interconnected to the North American electric marketplace this spring rate payers in southern Southeast towns might have more money in their wallets. With that connection plus having an associated purchase agreement with Bonneville Power, the towns of Petersburg, Wrangell and Ketchikan might have been purchasing virtually zero cost surplus BPA Columbia River spring outflow energy instead of burning expensive diesel generation. It leaves me wondering who is minding our utilities.
partners............
they have partnered with Angoon for Ruth lake, Kake tribal