• Overcast
  • 45°
    Overcast
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Oil industry profits, complaints revive tax cut debate

Posted: July 31, 2011 - 8:49pm

Alaska’s biggest oil companies are reporting strong profits from the North Slope this year, but Gov. Sean Parnell is still saying oil taxes need to be lowered because oil production is declining.

“There is an undeniable fact: oil production is down — sharply. We can’t afford to do nothing,” said Sharon Leighow, Parnell’s spokeswoman.

Rep. Les Gara, D-Anchorage, called Parnell’s proposal to reduce state oil taxes an “unwarranted giveaway.”

In the last week ConocoPhillips Co. and BP plc reported profits for the first half of the year.

ConocoPhillips reported earnings of $1.04 billion in Alaska, while BP plc is reporting profits of $784 million in the state. Those companies are the two largest oil producers in Alaska. The third of the state’s big three oil producers is Exxon Mobil Corp., which does not publicly release its Alaska profits.

ConocoPhillips is doing better in Alaska than they are elsewhere, Gara said.

“Alaska is a cash cow for them,” he said.

High prices the companies are receiving for Alaska North Slope crude oil this year mean the companies’ profits this year may come close to the record year of 2008, when oil prices peaked at $140 a barrel.

Alaska North Slope crude oil was going for $113.70 a barrel Friday, according to the Alaska Department of Revenue’s Tax Division.

The year 2008 was also a boon for the state, as Alaska had just passed the Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share oil tax law following the revelations of oil industry bribes paid during the establishment of the previous tax rates.

An industry analyst on questioned ConocoPhillips executives about that issue last week following the earnings announcement, noting the high profits “even with the penalty of the new tax regime in Alaska.”

Jeffrey Sheets, Conoco’s chief financial officer complained about how much Alaska’s taxes were taking from the company.

“A substantial part of the increase in prices, of course, in Alaska goes toward higher production taxes,” Sheets said.

Leighow said Alaska needed to lower taxes to make the state more competitive and get more oil in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.

Gara said the state’s existing targeted tax incentives were already spurring new development, citing new Alaska efforts by several companies new to Alaska.

“Just giving oil companies money, hoping they’ll give it back, has never worked, and won’t work now,” Gara said.

Sheets told the Wall Street analysts that they didn’t expect immediate action on tax reductions, but several legislators promised to renew their efforts in the next legislative session.

House Bill 106, offering billions in tax reductions, passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 22-16 last session. Rep. Cathy Muñoz, R-Juneau, voted in favor; Rep. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, voted against.

The bill is currently in the Senate’s Labor and Commerce Committee, Chaired by Sen. Dennis Egan. D-Juneau.

• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com

  • Comment

Comments (9)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Ratfishtim
530
Points
Ratfishtim 08/01/11 - 09:20 am
0
0

There she goes again!

"Leighow said Alaska needed to lower taxes to make the state more competitive and get more oil in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline."

That's not what she was saying when she was promoting ACES for Palin. She needs to get her story straight- oil company taxes are good one day, bad the next.

No wonder the 3rd floor has zero credibility on this issue.

JNUKara
8612
Points
JNUKara 08/01/11 - 10:29 am
0
0

Really?

"Jeffrey Sheets, Conoco’s chief financial officer complained about how much Alaska’s taxes were taking from the company."

Seriously? How about Alaskans start complaining about how much Conoco is taking from US?! We're taking from THEM?!
How is that even possible - they wouldn't have nearly the profit they do if they weren't here TAKING our oil.

swimmergirl
4368
Points
swimmergirl 08/01/11 - 01:47 pm
0
0

ah, pat forgey, important info missing....

....from this article!!! Why on earth would you write an article about oil companies complaining taxes to the state are too high, list the oil company profits, AND NOT LIST HOW MUCH IN TAXES WERE PAID TO THE STATE????

This seems like a pretty important piece of information, given that the brunt of the article is for folks to decide if indeed oil companies pay too many taxes in Alaska.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say it isn't even in the 10's of millions, but I don't know - if AK was getting, say, 3 billion dollars from ConocoPhillips, I might even say that was enough.

wmolson
4414
Points
wmolson 08/01/11 - 01:49 pm
0
0

Decisions based on facts

Whether all the facts listed in the article are correct or not, I am not sure. I don't have access to all the documents nor the ability to understand them all.
But I do know that the reason our State Senate put a hold on giving more tax breaks to the oil industry was that they wanted more facts. They said they wanted to wait until later in the year to get some more factual information. They did not accept threats and fearful predictions.
Now we are supposedly getting more facts, statistics and information. If the proposal to reduce taxes on the oil industry comes up again, the facts have to be recognized and accepted.

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 08/01/11 - 01:53 pm
0
0

Here's an idea Juneauites -

Here's an idea Juneauites - why not quit vilifying the oil companies and realize the benefits that funnel through them to the city where there is NO oil.

The greediness gets old and it's not good for your health to be so cranky all the time!

alaskanaking
134
Points
alaskanaking 08/01/11 - 03:14 pm
0
0

Tax them more

The extremely high price of oil is all the incentive that oil companies should need to expand their Alaska explorations. Are gold miners begging for a tax break? No, they are scrambling to take advantage of the very high price of gold. It makes no sense to give handouts to oil companies who are already making record profits.

Jo MacNamara
697
Points
Jo MacNamara 08/02/11 - 07:10 am
0
0

smokescreen

Lowering oil taxes will do nothing to boost production. It will merely boost revenues for big oil.

As long as big oil is paying ANY tax on our oil, they will [filtered word].

And as long as big oil has an oil lobbyist Governor in their pocket, big oil will continue to try to use him to reduce their taxes. It probably comes up at every board meeting.

I don't see how giving away $2 BN/year to companies already making huge profits will benefit Alaska in the least.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING