A legislative committee chaired by Sen. Dennis Egan, D-Juneau, met in Fairbanks on Tuesday to look into a point of contention during the last legislative session’s oil tax debate.
Among the questions committee members wanted answered was: If oil taxes are so high that they’re stifling North Slope development, as oil company allies such as Gov. Sean Parnell claim, why is the oil and gas industry posting record employment numbers?
Or, in the alternative: If things are going so well in the oil patch, why are so many Alaskans who want to work there unable to get hired?
The problem, some legislators are concluding, is that while oil companies are adding jobs, they’re bringing in their new employees from out of state.
“Alaskans are rightly concerned that at a time of near-record employment in the oil industry, fewer of those jobs are going to Alaskans,” said Egan, chairman of the Senate’s Labor & Commerce Committee, which held the hearings.
Parnell’s House Bill 110, which would slash state oil tax rates, ended the last session in Egan’s committee.
At the Fairbanks hearing, workers told the senators while the industry was seeking lower taxes, the Legislature needed to focus specifically on Alaska hiring.
“For too long we believe this has been given lip service — it’s time we face it head on,” said Jay Quackenbush, with the Fairbanks Building and Trades Council.
State Department of Labor and Workforce Development data show oil and gas employment in the state hovering at an all-time high, but too little of the North Slope work is going to Alaskan contractors and Alaskan workers.
“What little work that has come to our Alaskan contractors, they’ve found it difficult to find bed space in the camps,” Quackenbush said.
“The problem is the camps are full, but not with Alaskan workers,” he said.
In some cases, the camps are so full the “reprehensible” practice of “hot sheeting,” where two workers who work different shifts share the same bunk, is being reported, said Tim Sharp, business manager for the Alaska District Council of Laborers.
At the same time, Alaskans can’t get jobs there.
“The frustration in Fairbanks runs deep,” he said.
A few voices spoke up for the out-of-state workers, however, and oil industry allies tried to refocus the discussion on tax reductions.
“In 1976 my father was a non-resident worker,” said Joseph Blanchard, a member of the Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly and a student at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
He said the tourism industry, in which he works during the summer, has a worse resident hire record than does the oil industry.
“I work with plenty of folks who barely speak English,” Blanchard said.
Kara Moriarity of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association said Alaska benefits from new jobs even when the workers are from elsewhere.
“Non-resident hire is part of what allows Alaska’s economy to grow,” she said, pointing to he seafood industry as one with higher non-resident hire than the oil and gas business.
She acknowledge there had been an increase in North Slope employment, but said the state should instead focus on diminishing oil production.
“Regardless of jobs, production in Alaska continues to decline,” Moriarity said.
She said even last year’s robust exploration year wouldn’t translate into more oil in the trans-Alaska oil pipeline anytime soon.
“I urge the committee to focus on efforts that will increase production,” said Lisa Hebert, executive director of the Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce.
Not everyone believed all of the numbers they were hearing.
Sometimes, said Doyon Ltd. President Jim Johnson, those out of state workers are actually long time-Alaskans who moved away but return to work.
“We have employees who we hire here in Alaska who move Outside because it is cheaper to live Outside. It’s as simple as that,” he said.
Lynden Transport’s Ken Hall said he’s seen that as well when his workers moved.
“The expense of living in Alaska and in Fairbanks has played a factor in a number of our employees,” he said.
The Senate Labor & Commerce Committee’s hearing on House Bill 110 will continue tomorrow in Anchorage. No official action is taken during interim hearings.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.




Comments (10)
Add commentTourism & Seafood Need Reform, Too
The oil industry cited Alaska tourism and seafood as industries with higher rates of non-resident workers than oil. When Tim Sharp of the Fairbanks Laborer's Union testified yesterday, he noted that the tourism & seafood industries import five thousand J-1 Visa 'cultural-exchange students' from Europe each summer to work in Bristol Bay canneries, national park hotels and cruise line resorts throughout Alaska.
These jobs could go to young, rural Alaskans as summer jobs, but the industries decided that Estonian & Bulgarian 'students' will work cheaper, longer and without problems under threat of deportation. The J-1 Visa program is an abused US-State Dept. program that displaces American workers nationwide.
Parnell
He's bought and paid for - Parnell's job is to lie through his teeth.
Oil Patch jobs are specialized
About 5 years ago I was running an employment agency in Anchorage. The oil companies and the oil support companies would always attempt to hire Alaskan's, however there was a lack of trained people here in Alaska. I testified to the work force development committe and told them the problem was that the education system in Alaska really did not support the industries here in Alaska. If you look at the people who are being hired they come from TX, OK, LA. What do these states have in common? They all have education systems that support the oil industry. AVTEC is about the only state sponsored entity that supports Alaska industries. If you look at their budget you will notice they get a small fraction of state funding as compaired to UAA, UAF, UAS. A very small fraction. The problem is caused by our own ignorance not by the oil companies.
Only a Texan can do it. Right?
As a long time oil field employee, I can assure you that the vast majority of the jobs in the oil patch are not highly specialized and generally involve trades and skills that are taught either by the company as on the job training or by trade unions as part of a professional development program.
A large part of the local employment problem is that what generally happens is the companies like to hire managers from outside who then bring on employees that they are familiar with from other jobs in other places. Any supervisor would like to hire employees that he had used before and is familiar with. Unless something specific limits this practice it will continue as it has in the past with no change.
I very rarely find myself in
I very rarely find myself in agreement with Chip Thoma and when I do, I always rethink my position certain that there is some flaw in my reasoning. In this case, however, I agree with Mr. Thoma completely. While the state cannot trump Federal Law surely there are ways to offer significant disincentives to employers who want to hire foreign national work forces.
I agree JNUFFWC
I agree. Although I spent most of my life in "academia" not everyone who completes high school wants to go on to college, and may not have the skills for "academic life."
I grew up in a small town in North Dakota where we had the State's "School of Science." It is still doing well today - however the courses and programs taught have changed dramatically over the past fifty years. They have tried to determine what courses students need to have good hands-on jobs in the future.
John Gardener in 1962 in the Saturday Evening Post, sort of summed it up for me:
"The society that scorns excellence in plumbing because plumbing is a humble activity,and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because philosophy is an exalted activity, will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy. Neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water."
Those who want to earn college degrees should be given the preparation to do so. Those who wish to be skilled artisans, craftsmen, businessmen should have the same opportunity for post-secondary education.
jobs
The State can't trump Federal Law but with jobs being the primary agenda item throughout politics, now may be the time to get that law changed.
Thank you Dennis Egan!
Thank you Senator, for once again putting the interests of Alaskans ahead of big oil.
YES to hiring Alaskans on the north slope.
NO to Parnell's $2 billion giveaway incentives to the oil industry!
Keep up the good work Dennis. Thank GOD for Democrats like you!
Some things I don't understand
When people say that workers are not really from out of State from Alaska because they used to live here, but moved out of Alaska and now live elsewhere, and that makes them sort of Alaskans.
To me, an Alaskan is one who lives here and resides here. Its pretty simple.
To say that they are really Alaskans but found it is cheaper to live elsewhere, and come back up to Alaska on some regular work shift to benefit from Alaska is kind of a lie.
Either they live here, buy their food and other things here, pay local property taxes like resident Alaskans do, their children are in school here, then they are "out of state workers".
I'm sure corporations could find people who have at one time resided in Alaska and count them now as "residents" if they hire them to make their corporations appear that they are hiring "Alaskans."
I think when Senator Egan and others are looking at Alaskan hires, they are not talking about people who sometime in the past lived here for a year, a few years or more, but people who actually live in Alaska.
Get to the root cause...the math
Folks, the root cause of the problem is the math.
It's pretty simple really:
North Slope job equals $90,000 per year.
Cost of living 30+% less in lower 48 (so equal to $69K salary)
A two week on, two week schedule is 13 rotations per year.
13 ANC/West Coast R/T airfares per year less than $10,000.
Same size house in Lower 48 literally half the price.
For many Alaskans, the beauty and lifestyle of our state surpass all other considerations. But how many folks do you know would be tempted to move if given a work schedule that in essence provides a 10-15% spending power incentive after cost of airfare by moving Outside?
Thank you for your efforts Senator, but we need to focus on affordable, available housing in Juneau and elsewhere in Alaska if we want to keep local hires local.