Oil companies seeking billions in reduced taxes from Alaska defended their local hire efforts at a state Senate hearing in Anchorage Thursday, while at least one promised changes to boost Alaska hire.
The Senate’s Labor & Commerce Committee is holding hearings on Gov. Sean Parnell’s proposed oil production tax reductions.
Parnell said that would boost Alaskan employment, but the committee is looking into what chair Sen. Dennis Egan, D-Juneau, called “unsettling observations” that recently came to light, that being in 2010 more than half of new oil industry hires came from outside Alaska.
Representatives of ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil defended their local hiring practices and said they already preferred to hire Alaskans.
BP Alaska’s Claire Fitzpatrick said her company did as well, but also promised to do more in the future to boost Alaska hiring.
“We will always hire the best candidate for the job, but our preference is to hire qualified Alaskans,” she said.
She acknowledged some North Slope workers lived out of state and flew in for work. BP encourages local hire by providing transportation from Anchorage or Fairbanks, but not outside Alaska, she said. And non-resident workers are responsible for any flight delays, she said.
Fitzpatrick said most of BP’s employees are Alaskans, but the company is making new efforts to track Alaska hire by its contractors and subcontractors and encourage them to hire more Alaska residents.
BP’s bid packages will start looking beyond just quality, price and safety, she said.
“In the future we will also include also include Alaska hire as one of the specific criteria in awarding contracts,” she said.
Sen. Joe Paskvan, D-Fairbanks, praised that pledge.
“On the North Slope there have been contractors with very high non-residency rates,” he said.
Fitzpatrick said BP would also break up bundled contracts into smaller chunks so that more companies would be able to bid on them.
Exxon Mobil’s local production manager, Dale Pittman, said his company supported local hire all over the world. At Exxon’s Sakhalin Island facility in Russia, it worked hard to find qualified Russians to work there, he said.
At similar hearing in Fairbanks on Tuesday, local workers criticized what they called “flyover” jobs, Outside workers who fly in for two-week shifts on the North Slope.
A new sleeping facility inside Anchorage International Airport will enable those coming to Alaska for North Slope jobs to never leave the airport or even go outside TSA security.
Thursday Sen. Cathy Giessel, R-Anchorage, who spent the hearing acting as an advocate of the oil industry, challenged the significance of the new pods.
She said she checked with Transportation Commissioner Marc Luiken, and said she needed to clarify the “very dramatic” statements she heard Tuesday from a union representative.
“It’s not targeting North Slope workers, it’s open to anyone who wants to use it,” she said she was told.
AFL-CIO Alaska President Vince Beltrami said that was contradicted by an advertisement for the sleeping pods shown to the committee Tuesday in Fairbanks
“It was offering significant discounts for oil field workers,” he noted.
Giessel said that wasn’t the intent of the commissioner when he approved it.
She then noted oil production in Alaska had dropped from an average of 100 barrels per worker recently to only 50 barrels per worker in 2010.
“We would like your help in getting that production up,” she said.
Giessel and other advocates of cutting oil taxes tried repeatedly to shift the focus of the hearings from Alaska hire to boosting oil production, saying the core issue was really pipeline throughput.
That effort included an email from Parnell to supporters, urging them to attend the hearings and try to get them refocused on the central question of cutting taxes, which he said would boost oil production.
Egan began the hearings by saying they were intended to focus on his committee’s area of responsibility, looking in to Parnell’s claims that the tax cuts he proposed would result in more jobs for Alaskans. However, he gave wide latitude to chamber of commerce representatives and other tax cut proponents.
But Paskvan took issue with the Parnell’s strategy.
“Every worker should feel a little insulted that the governor doesn’t think Alaska hire is a core issue,” he said.
Thursday, Parnell spokeswoman said the governor “remains committed to creating more opportunities for Alaska families by increasing Alaska’s investment climate.”
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (15)
Add comment"Burn me twice..., shame on me"
.BP said it was "making NEW efforts to track Alaska hire"...by it`s subcontractors. what a joke. How many years has BP been the second largest producer here??? and they never study their workforce? Baloney. They have to, to even comply with state and OSHA safety requirements where each employee has to be documented as having been certified in the various job safety requirements. For these huge companies to plead ignorance is farcical. They are pushing a new scam, with Parnell`s help to get that two billion a year is what they are doing! Technology can go to the moon and slant-drill and frac gas and oil out of rocks, but they don`t know how many Alaskans they have "under" their employ? This is what they do best folks. It`s called intellectual dishonesty. They can count every barrel (we hope...???) of oil they bring up out of the ground (millions of barrels a WEEK!), but they are ignorant about the addresses and homes (and QUALIFICATIONS???) of people on their property?? Come on......If Governor Parnell, and Exxon and co., think they can dangle a few jobs in front of the faces of Alaskans, and get two billion a year shoved to them across the ACES table, to take straight out of Alaska, without a fight, they are dreaming. The big three ALL testified last year they would not drill any new wells even if we gutted the windfall profits provisions of ACES and gave them the 2 billion a year! OK fine!! Smaller drillers have come into the state and ARE drilling under the current fiscal regime. Suppose we bought this job scam again, what would that work out to?? A million bucks per Alaskan job?? This is all Deja-Vu all over again. It was ruled unconstitutional YEARS AGO! If we try it again we will lose another lawsuit again, and will have given a huge portion of our fiscal health away in the bargain, AGAIN for nothing. Like PPT and ELF! All pushed through the legislature with the help of the likes of these folks who had their hands out to VECO.. Incredibly, these same folks are STILL lobbying for the producers on the floor of the people`s house. Don`t be fooled Alaska. "No tax deduction without increased production" needs to be Alaskans` mantra, PERIOD! http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/102807/let_20071028011.shtml
Help me with some calculations
I'm not great at math so I need some help. If we reduce taxes on the oil industry by over one billion dollars a year -money that otherwise could be used to improve life in Alaska, how many jobs will it take for Alaskan workers to earn over a billion dollars a year??
The oil resources of Alaska belongs to Alaskans and before we give it away, we need to know what we will get in return.
A billion is
$ 100,000 is wages for 10,000 employees. Now I believe that would be more than the total current employment in the Alaska oil industry.
It would make more sense to make a lottery and give 1,000 individuals $ 10,000 from the current oil taxes. That would cost $ 10,000,000 and leave $ 980,000,000 for Alaskan infrastructure building with the remainder.
In any event I can not compute enough potential jobs in the oil industry that would equate to a billion a year in wages for Alaskans.
We`ll know better "what we
We`ll know better "what we get", when the people of Alaska see a true, COMPLETE, and current audit on ACES and it`s positive affect on drilling new wells and attracting hungry new companies (28 new exploration wells by next summer! the most since the 33 drilled into Prudhoe Bay back in the day), and employment growth on the slope (close to a record number of new jobs.. though not a record number of Alaskans hired). I hope I`m not alone in demanding a full audit on ACES before we are tricked, again, into giving away our sovereignty to the conglomerate on the slope. "NO TAX REDUCTION without an INCREASE IN PRODUCTION". Where is the Department of Revenue audit that will support, or not, the premise that TAPS will run dry in a couple of years, and Exxon and BP are walking away from several trillion dollars worth of recoverable oil and natural gas liquids, with the basic infrastructure already in and paid for 5 times over, because ACES is "discouraging investment"?
Islander
With my little calculator, I figured that if 500 Alaskans were to get jobs with the oil industry at $100,000 a year, Alaskans would get $50 million in income. Now let's see, the State gives up a billion dollars to get $50 million in benefits. That doesn't seem to be a good business practice.
Maybe my calculations are off.
Stop the handouts to these
Stop the handouts to the destructive polluting industries:
oil, gas, mining and timber!
I also nearly fell out of my chair yesterday hearing that Sean Parnell is giving MORE state land and 700,000. of stimulus money to the timber industry! This industry has already caused tremendous damage in our state, and this "handout" will only encourage out of state loggers to move to Alaska!
I want to see investment & encouragement go to the non-destructive industries. Our State must consider climate change and how our investments will impact it. Remember we are at Ground Zero for climate change. We have to course correct.
And our Forests are one of the single most COST EFFECTIVE ways to combat Global Warming. The Timber industry is trying to FALL Flat on its face yet STILL some folks are trying to hold it up with handouts??? Good grief!!
And more drilling is not an answer it will only keep us on our current destructive path.
We should promote conservation and change the ways we use energy and encourage non-destructive, non-polluting industries to move here.
******Our state MUST COURSE CORRECT TODAY ******
Why should the oil companies want hire Alaskans ?
If I were an oil company I would not hire Alaskans. Who in their right mind would hire some Alaskan who may actually may care about what happens on the North Slope, then goes home to some Alaska town and talks to their friends and neighbors about what is taking place or not taking place on the North Slope. But that is more the legislators can wrap their minds around or for the brighter ones --- want to wrap their minds around.
The oil companies have prosing local hire for the last 40 years and it has not happed yet. The Oil Companies promised native hire on the construction TAPS as condition of being allowed to construct TAPS that did not happen by the oil companies own admission. So the oil companies promised native hire when the corroded gathering system was replaced. That did not happen either. The oil were even going to train the natives they didn’t. The gathering system corroded because they hired someone to see that necessary measures to inhibit corrosion were not taken. The corrosion inhibitors were never inject into the lines to prevent the the corrosion.
The oil companies made money by allowing the corrosion to take place just as they plan to make money in continuing to allow TAPS to corrode.
Alaska oil tax credits are far too generous.
Sen. Giessel from Anchorage is just another republican oil company shill like Parnell and most republicans. Selling out is what republicanism is all about whether it is state, local or federal.
The oil companies make the excuse that cannot find qualified Alaskans yet the oil companies do not provide schools to train Alaskans for those jobs. The Legislature need to place and additional tax of one percent on oil production to provide State schools to train Alaskans for oil field jobs that oil companies say that they cannot find qualified Alaskans.
The only way to get Alaska hire is to tax the oil companies more and use the taxes for State of Alaska infrastructure projects where the State can train and hire Alaskans.
Icome Tax
Why not put an income tax in place for out of state residents? It would make it more attractive to relocate to Alaska.
I am for an income tax. I
I am for an income tax and lets build Casinos and make our state a first rate tourist attraction.
I would rather see this than what Parnell is doing!
Ca$ino$
Casinos is an interesting concept. I wouldn't be opposed to that.
But, back to the subject, I can see giving $5 - $10 million in incentives to oil companies to hire locally. But $2 BILLION?!?
TWO BILLION DOLLARS?!?
This is nothing more than a giveaway from Parnell, our republican governor, to his buds in the oil industry who keep him in their pocket.
ACES is working! Leave it alone! Don't lower ANY oil taxes without proof of an increase in production or local hire!
Parnell/Tax Breaks
Can you spell "[filtered word]?" I can....
Parnell/Tax breaks
"Filtered Word" refers to one who sells their body and soul, for money.
To Filtered Word , When you
To Filtered Word , When you prostitute or sell some else’s assets it is called pimping. Parnell is a pimp. Parnell is prostituting resources.
Words
OkeyDoke...I stand corrected...