Voters will have a choice Tuesday whether or not to impose a 15-cent plastic bag tax for stores with revenues greater than $15 million annually. Different people have different views on what the tax will mean.
Large retailers would charge the 15-cent tax to shoppers using store-supplied disposable plastic shopping bags. The alternatives to paying would be to use paper bags or bring one’s own reusable bags.
This ballot initiative was brought about by a citizens group called Turning the Tides. Its representative, Dixie Belcher, said the tax is the most effective way to change customer behavior as a means to help the environment.
“Plastic bags all by themselves are killing the ocean,” said Belcher. She said such bags are also eaten by sea life, which is later eaten by us as seafood.
Belcher said the tax is an effective way to go about this. She said similar taxes in large stores have proven to work in other cities. She said some stores with such taxes have cut down plastic bag usage by 90 to 95 percent in the first year.
“If it doesn’t pass, most people won’t try to change their behavior,” she said.
She said recycling isn’t an effective alternative for shoppers using reusable bags. She said recycling isn’t economically viable because it costs a lot of money and those recycled bags don’t go for much on the market. She said this has led to a lot of stocks of recycled bags with no place to go.
Belcher said 2007 figures from the Christian Science Monitor state that only 5.2 percent of plastic bags are recycled, and that recycling 1 ton costs $4,000 but could be sold on the commodities market for only $32 after recycling.
“So the economics aren’t very good,” she said.
Belcher said there are four retailers in Juneau at this point that would be affected by the tax: Fred Meyer, Walmart, Safeway and Home Depot. She said that if other retailers’ revenues ever go above the $15 million mark per year, they would also be required to charge the tax.
Of the four named, only Fred Meyer could be reached for comment. Fred Meyer Public Affairs Director Melinda Merrill said the company isn’t necessarily opposed to bag legislation. She said that the issue with this particular one is that it will not be effective nor will it create a level playing field, as it only targets certain retailers. Merrill said the indications point to more shoppers turning to paper bags instead of reusable ones. She said that would still lead to increased costs because paper costs much more than plastic, which would mean increased bag costs and shipping costs.
“We’ll see a 60 percent increase in paper bag use so that would increase our costs tremendously,” said Merrill.
She said that cost would be passed on to the customers.
Belcher said the plastic bag tax wouldn’t have a negative effect on the stores. She said statistics have shown taxes to be very effective.
Merrill said this bag tax as written is flawed because there are no reusable bag incentives, so customers will simply go to paper instead of reusable. She said Fred Meyer has experimented with eliminating plastic bags in Portland stores and the majority of customers turned to paper.
Fred Meyer President Mike Ellis gave testimony before the Oregon Senate Committee on Environment and Natural Resources on this issue last year. He stated that while reusable bags have increased in popularity over the last several years, it was the paper bag use that skyrocketed once plastic was eliminated. He testified that without reusable bag incentives, customers simply shifted from one free disposable bag to another.
It is not only the large retailers who are weighing in on the issue. Wade Bryson, owner of Subway in Juneau, said the tax is unbalanced because it targets the largest retailers and singles out individual types of businesses for tax levies. He said the businesses would experience negative consequences because of it, which will affect their employees who work in Juneau.
He said, if passed, Proposition 5 also opens the door for other unbalanced legislations. He said this could include future laws governing national franchises such as his.
Belcher said Turning the Tides has been working on this issue for 6 years.
She said if it passes, the volunteer group will help out by passing out 1,000 free bags at the food stamp office, food bank and other places where people don’t have a lot of money to spend on bags.
• Contact reporter Jonathan Grass at 523-2276 or at jonathan.grass@juneauempire.com.




Comments (13)
Add commentBag tax
Isn't the tax only levied at customers who use plastic bags? There is not extra expense to the stores, just the consumer. If I read it correctly, the cashier will also have to keep track of the number of bags used as this is a $0.15 per bag.
give away
Vote early, vote often
Vote NO
This will not solve the problem. The tax should be the same for all stores. The tax should be the same no matter the age of the person. The tax revenue should be used for a solution not for the general funds.
Taxes is for stores
The way it is written ( by the empire anyway)is that the tax is for the stores. The stores will merely pass the bag tax onto customers. The empire states "impose a 15-cent plastic bag tax for stores with revenues greater than $15 million annually."
nomore
Repeal the (perminat) temporary 3% sales tax
nomore
Repeal the (perminat) temporary 3% sales tax
I thought LIBERALS were for equality..
nope, they only want to tax the rich.
So instead of coming up with a REAL solution to the problem (ie - Maui banned the use of plastic bags), they are going to make the rest of us PAY for it. So now A & P, Superbear, and ALL the touristy seasonal stores (with 90% of their workforce being non-locals) will have a price advantage over the big guys.
VOTE NO.... Turning the Tides should have a REAL alternative, not shoving this one down our throats, which will only result in higher costs.
plus, didn't the environmentalist demand we stop using paper bags years ago?? (from a RENEWABLE energy source)
(and for the record, I shop (mostly) with reusable bags).
Don't argue, just vote it down!
You can't convince environmental extremists on anything. They are convinced they know what is best and will use the power of new laws to attempt to force their ideas on everyone. Don't argue or attempt to use logic with them as you only make them more irritated and more extreme. When possible, like this, just vote it down.
I'm a liberal from hell
And as a card-carrying member of the ACLU living on the left side of hell, I am voting this down.
It will go down in flames anyway. People simply don't want it, and it is flawed in so many ways, that it would surely result in lawsuits from those 4 retailers in the unlikely event it should pass.
And the lawsuits would cost CBJ tons of money.
Just vote no.
Ridiculous Waste of Time
This prop will not pass, should not pass, is not fair and equal, and has wasted too much time.
Think of all the energy gone to this that could have been spent in a more productive way...
Turn the Tides: Make signs, take over plastic bag recycling centers and place kiosks at the front of all stores for people who don't bring their own bags.
This sentence by Belcher says
This sentence by Belcher says it all. This is the thinking of the left - 2+2=5.
"She said if it passes, the volunteer group will help out by passing out 1,000 free bags at the food stamp office, food bank and other places where people don’t have a lot of money to spend on bags."
Please, voters, don't let this kook fringe group gain any traction in the city. What would be the next thing on their agenda?
Kill the bag tax on Tuesday...
How stupid!
How stupid!
What !
Who thinks up all this crap ?
@orionsbow1....The ordinance
@orionsbow1....The ordinance would impose a tax on customers at the point-of-sale per plastic bag used, but only at retailers that earn $15 million gross revenue or ......