The state is no longer planning to build a new office building in Juneau, but will instead renovate one deteriorating building and do additional studies before deciding what to do about its local office space needs in the future.
The decision, announced Friday by Department of Administration Commissioner Becky Hultberg, means employees at the Department of Labor Building known locally as the “Plywood Palace,” will remain there for at least the near future.
At the same time, a Douglas building housing Alaska Department of Fish & Game employees is slated for major improvements.
“It’s not what the Juneau delegation wants, but the silver lining is it’s not a done deal,” said Rep. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau.
A bill sponsored by fellow Rep. Cathy Muñoz, R-Juneau, to build a replacement building on the downtown subport property died in the Legislature after the Plywood Palace owners hired a lobbyist to oppose it.
The state then began a looking for new sites on which to build a new office building. A months-long search of possible locations narrowed options down to two: one in the Mendenhall Valley’s Vintage Park commercial area, and one downtown atop the current State Office Building’s north parking structure.
Nearly two months after state officials said they’d decide between two, Hultberg made the surprise announcement Friday that neither would be chosen.
Instead, she said, they would do the space study and renovate the Douglas building and look as well for offices for the staff at the downtown Public Safety Building, nearing the end of its useful life.
Hultberg also opened the door for the state remaining in the existing Department of Labor building, a change from previous statements from the administration.
“We recognize now that the building is in better condition, but it is not perfect and certainly some work needs to be done,” she said.
“I believe the building owner is aware of that as well,” she said.
Employees, and previous administration officials, had said they wanted to both be out of a leased building with inadequate maintenance, water infiltration and mold problems, as well as being in state-owned facilities where possible.
“The focus in the near-term is that employees have a good, safe place to work,” Hultberg said.
The Department of Labor Building’s owners have done some significant interior work to improve the building, she said.
“That’s not to say there’s nothing that needs to be upgraded, but compared to past years the building is in better condition.”
The space study will help answer questions about whether it is more cost effective to lease or own, how much space is available and needed and how large a building might be needed.
The state’s longer-term focus “is identifying a permanent and longer-term location for the Department of Labor, whether it is in that building or someplace else.”
The state’s lease for the Labor building, at a cost of $1.947 million a year, expires June 30, she said. An extension, presumably at a higher rate, is being negotiated.
Muñoz said she was happy to see the state taking the steps it is taking, even if wasn’t the one originally proposed.
“Obviously, I’d love to see a green light on a brand new state facility in town, but I also know that it’s prudent to look at maximizing the effectiveness of what we have now,” she said.
Playing a key role in Hultberg’s decision, she said, was the ongoing progress on the State Library, Archives and Museum building now being designed but not yet funded.
When that building opens, it will free up the current library space on the 7th and 8th floors of the State Office Building. That might be able to house the nearby employees at the Public Safety Building, Hultberg said.
At the same time, new studies have determined that while the Douglas Island Office Building has significant deferred maintenance needs, it is structurally sound.
Hultberg said the building’s problems can be corrected in a cost-effective manner by replacement of the building “envelope,” essentially its walls and roof, and that can be can be done while it is occupied.
Kerttula and Muñoz said they are prepared to help push for a capital appropriation during the next legislative session, if Gov. Sean Parnell includes it in his budget.
Hultberg said costs have yet to be determined, but she’s been in contact with the Governor’s Office about the budget.
Kerttula said that while Hultberg’s announcement wasn’t what she’d hoped for, it was not all bad.
“The door is not shut or foreclosed for getting a new building, it’s just not going to happen right now,” she said.
And she said she very much likes the idea of being able to keep the Fish & Game employees in Douglas, where they have been for years and where they are an integral part of the city.
Hultberg said the administration’s recommendation could still be a new building, depending on the office space analysis.
“We’re not saying we’re taking a new building off the table, but we’re saying we have some additional work that needs to be cone before we are prepared to recommend a new building, or certainly a building size or location,” Hultberg said.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.
Editor's note: This story has been changed to reflect the correct cost for the state's lease of the Department of Labor building.





Comments (14)
Add commentSick building......
Staff who work daily in the Department of Labor building have many respiratory problems, many sick days, and lost productivity as they struggle to stay healthy in a building with a long history of mold and ventilation issues. How is the decision to leave them there a sound decision? Costs to eradicate the problem will continue until the building is abandoned and condemned. Lost productivity and absenteeism will also continue. Potential litigation for purposeful exposure to known pathogens is not a good risk for the state to take. This decision will have devastating consequences to everyone involved.
Looks like the plywood palace
Looks like the plywood palace building owner greased the right skidds (in the Parnell Administration). To hell with the health of State employees seems to be the attitude of the Legislators and the Administration. Renovate the dumpy Douglas building so it will last a few more years so they can move everything at once!!
I seriously doubt the museum and archives building project will everget funded either. They will move it to Anchorage just as the Legislators will vote themselves a new office building courtesy of Sen.Menard...
While the capital move issue isn't in Juneau's face like in the past, its still alive and well and will eventually succeed, sad to say....
thanks for looking out for
thanks for looking out for our best interests....NOT
timing of the news release
I bet the timing of this news release to the media was timed so that it was not played out during the work week as that is when the empire gets its most comments.
Remodeling WIll Cost More
I took a job a year ago with the State at the DOL building and I was told not to plug anything into any receptacle that was not already plugged in - or it trips the breaker and the power goes out. How safe is that? Combined with the mold and general building condition, it's time to move out of that building and put employees into a safer environment. The Anchorage building isn't much better - and surprise, surprise! They were built by the same contractor - and leased to the State by the same owner.
Building
Looks like the Parnell Gestapo strikes again!
Who owns the Plywood Palace?
Can't the state of Alaska mandate certain quality control minimums for mold, air quality, etc. to be determined by a non-state environmental agency? That way, either the Plywood Palace owners pour the necessary funds into the building to bring it up to the standards required by the workers, or the state finds a new place to build/occupy.
Why should they have to settle for poor working conditions?
Health is more important.
If that building is in such hazardous condition I'd demolish it and start fresh. It is not worth saving money if it endangers the
health of the employees... that in itself would incur further expenses in the long term.
SLAM is a slam dunk.
$2 million is in the bag!
Building
The owners of The Plywood Palace do live out of state
I'm glad some business is
I'm glad some business is staying in Douglas. There is no reason the building of an office building has to be a fight between downtown and the valley. It's important to keep business in Douglas, too.
This is pretty sick! They
This is pretty sick! They hire a lobbyist and now that changes everything. Instead of a new building that will not only put people to work (construction), improve the commute for the majority of the people who work in that building, improve working conditions for ALL the employees who work in that building, and provide opportunities for valley businesses, the owners (two people) continue to profit their nearly $1.5 million/year for a building that is rotting! AND to top it all off, those few people who are benefiting the most don't even live in Alaska! So much for our government doing what's in the best interest of our state and local residents!
does?
Make sure you patch all the holes in the walls and re-insulate the building. When you take a receptical out of a wall you aren't supposed to breath fresh air and see daylight.
That was a reference to the Douglas building...
The Dept of Labor building is probably beyond repair.
When a building has long-term mold problems it becomes impossible to do the proper mold remediation even if the wet problems are fixed. It takes only a few DAYS for moisture to become a mold issue and buildings who have suffered with it for years, even decades, are not good candidates for just 'fixing the problem.'
When it comes to mold, building owners don't always do what they 'should' do. It appears that doing the right thing is optional around here. Mold sickness doesn't just 'go away' once you have removed yourself from the mold, either. It can cause permanent and even fatal health issues. Each person must think for himself when exposed to a moldy work environment.