The Juneau Homeless Coalition expects to have a plan ready to begin a vulnerability index for Juneau’s “homeless chronic inebriate” population in January.
The coalition, which is comprised of several service groups working with the homeless population, has identified a group of people that are most in need of services and is looking to create more efficiencies between agencies that aim to help them. It also is a subgroup of the Juneau Economic Development Council. Part of that process includes creating a vulnerability index, where specific members will hit the streets and survey willing participants who don’t have a home and typically use alcohol. That will create a book of those who need services and rank them according to their need.
The coalition is exploring a Housing First model, which — if it eventually comes to fruition — would give those folks a place to stay.
Scott Ciambor, former affordable housing coordinator with JEDC, told the coalition at its meeting Thursday afternoon that he and Glory Hole Director Mariya Lovishchuk have worked out a draft survey for the index.
“I wanted to get feedback from all the partners,” he said. “I think it gives a pretty accurate reflection of the conversations we’ve had on this issue for the past few months.”
The reason for the delay in kicking off the index is twofold — firstly they wanted to get more input, and secondly the group still needs funding. Ciambor said he’s been speaking with statewide partners about funding for it, and while the feedback is positive, those groups have been busy with a housing summit.
The group also has come up with a preliminary report on the costs currently incurred by treating this population in a cyclical manner — pick up off the streets, send to treatment or jail, release them back to the streets. In some cases, those people get into longer-term treatment centers.
Early data from the city show the Juneau Police Department has an average of five interactions per day with the homeless chronic inebriate population — or 100 per month in the winter months. The average number of arrests is 10, and complaints per month is 25. The data also state that population is less than 3 percent of all criminal cases.
Capital City Fire and Rescue respond about five times per week to this population, the data show.
Library staff, the contractor managing the parking garages and Centennial Hall staff all also handle this population on a weekly and daily basis.
The city estimated costs at $169,000 annually — plus the $1.2 million it allocates to the Rainforest Recovery Center.
Only three downtown businesses are specifically listed in the report, but comments for issues and costs are replacement of shattered windows, employee training for cleanup of hazardous materials, possibly putting up a gate system, replacement of a door, expanding staff hours to have more presence, installation of more locks and security cameras. That cost $35,400, sans training costs.
Rainforest Recovery also listed cost data, tracking its 10 most frequent patients. Those patients cost $128,414 for just two months — August and September. While some of those patients have gone to more extensive treatment programs elsewhere, if the top 10 continued the trend for a full year those expenses would be $770,484. Rainforest also treats more than 10 patients at a time.
A representative of Bartlett Regional Hospital said she did a quick track of self-pay patients for the past year for hospital detox. Of 40 patients, she roughly estimated half were homeless, which garnered about $480,000 in costs — not including emergency room fees.
Those data are still considered draft figures.
One member of the coalition asked if it could also track for co-occurring illnesses in the people surveyed. He said there are specific treatment and service options for those that do.
Lovishchuk said she wants to have the index completed by the end of the winter — March at the latest. She said it will be a lot easier to find and talk to these people in the winter months while they are in fewer places and when there are less transients around.
“I think this is really the next concrete step that would have to get done,” she said.
Ciambor said the early data show a conservative number of $1.4 million to handle the issue.
“I think we can probably be more efficient with some of these strategies,” he said.
• Contact reporter Sarah Day at 523-2279 or at sarah.day@juneauempire.com.





Comments (21)
Add commentThe Juneau Homeless Coalition
The Juneau Homeless Coalition expects to have a plan ready to begin a vulnerability index for Juneau’s “homeless chronic inebriate” population in January.
Next steps to treat chronic inebriates, buy them a one way ticket out of the State of Alaska!
The early data show a conservative number of $1.4 million to handle the issue. It's not my or our problem taking care of the homeless people, Tell Them to Get a Job! $1.4 million dollars! Jesus, not from us TAXPAYERS!!! I am BROKE taxpayer.
Homeless people have some kind of family they can mooch off of. I for one am getting sick of these homeless people looking for hand outs...this is a tough world we live in, tough get going and doing for themselves. Hell with the bums.
This is my own opinion shared by others broke tax payers
AH HA
I have to agree to a certain extent. I did notice that SEARHC was not mentioned in this discussion either in the past articles or in this one and yet a quick look downtown will tell you that a fair percentage of the chronic inebriates are or should be SEARHC beneficiaries. Why no help from that quarter? As a matter of fact, being a SEARHC beneficiary implies that generally one is also a tribal shareholder and I see no mention of any help for these folks from that quarter either.
Perhaps as a means of motivating SEARHC to be a little more proactive in treating their beneficiaries the City/BRH/Rainforest treatment center could start actively attempting to recover costs from SEARHC for treating their patients.
I don't care what color of
I don't care what color of person you are brown, black, white or yellow...I just can't stand lazy people that don't want to work and getting everything for free and handed to them...and I can't stand Non-profits exploiting the homeless and drunks so they can have a pay checks at TAX PAYER's expense.
Let the churches do what they can....keep the Government out of it. Bums don't pay taxes. Let their families take care of their homeless family members. Single parents? Stay married! Whats so hard about that?
Cheaper to buy them a one way ticket out of the State of Alaska.
I don't care what color of
I don't care what color of person you are brown, black, white or yellow...I just can't stand lazy people that don't want to work and getting everything for free and handed to them...and I can't stand Non-profits exploiting the homeless and drunks so they can have a pay checks at TAX PAYER's expense.
Let the churches do what they can....keep the Government out of it. Bums don't pay taxes. Let their families take care of their homeless family members. Single parents? Stay married! Whats so hard about that?
Cheaper to buy them a one way ticket out of the State of Alaska.
Comment
Juneau had a problem with garbage bears. Bears were addicted not only to garbage but pet food and food in bird feeders. So Juneau forced the bears to go cold turkey. It was seen a humane rather than inhumane, and that seemed to be true. The problem is largely solved.
With drunks who sell their food stamp credit cards to obtain more booze (because they can obtain food in other places apparently), it seems will do exactly the opposite of what we did with the bears. Going cold turkey with the drunks would be inhumane apparently, just the opposite of what we successfully did with the bears. How can anyone believe that we will be as successful with the drunks (or even a little bit successful)?
I hope that none of the leaders in this help-the-inebriates effort have raised any children because my experience is that the garbage bear model works much better in raising children to be responsible adults than does this apparent coddling-drunks model. I am learning more about Juneau than I am learning about chronic inebriates.
As I walk through downtown Juneau
I see people that are just like me. I wear the same Carhart jacket and jeans. The only difference is I am sober and in recovery for over 30 years. Thinking back 30 years I am forever grateful for the people who cared enough for me to find my path toward recovery.
Not once did they threaten to "buy me a one way ticket out of Alaska." Not once did they judge me for my past behavior. They helped me until I can help myself. Along the way I began to help others that were just like me and many came to realize that there is another way of living.
All I have to offer them is my experience, strength and hope. I am also a broke taxpayer but compassionate enough to take responsibility for helping others so they can help themselves for that I am grateful.
Tough Love
When will the tough love begin? I'll be honest I have been known to give a dollar now again to our chronic inebriates only to see the person the next day staggering downtown the street having just peed his pants. I feel bad for the people, many have mental illnesses, but until they themselves want to solve their own problem there is nothing that we can do but enable them. You can't treat a mental illness until someone is sober.
Needless to say I'm making it a point not to give anyone money on the street unless they are playing music or ringing a bell with a kettle nearby.
"Homeless"
Having grown up in Juneau and in my opinion Juneau did not have a "problem" until the Gloryhole opened for business. Why try and change if you get free food and a place to stay. There is an old saying "a family with food on the table has many problems, a family with no food on the table has one problem"
I never give them money. I
I never give them money. I work for my money, and I work very hard for it.
@JNUFFWC: how nice that
@JNUFFWC: how nice that you're so much better than those people. It must be hard bringing yourself to kick people who are already down.
When I was a kid, one of the most common themes in the media I consumed was in putting yourself in someone else's place and not judging others based on your own limited perceptions. It's a pity you never learned those lessons, because if you did, I bet you'd not only be less angry, but you'd probably be a more moral person. This goes for most of you above.
Lack of compassion is probably the greatest of character flaws, and before any of you leap to blame "inebriates" and the homeless for our society's ills, maybe you should look at your own inflexible, ignorant attitudes.
Angadaxtseen...
Cool! Where we gonna ship 'em to? Concentration Camps? Ya know, that's really quite a solution ya got there. Now all the communities, instead of being communities, can ship their homeless to each other!! How profound! Only problem is, it costs alot and doesn't solve the problem. Hmmmnnn... maybe you should take that brilliant IQ of yours back to the drawing board and giver it another go! Lol! Merry Christmas Grouchy!
Persnickety P / Wolfmagic
Right on........
I remember a place where the
I remember a place where the British used to send their undesirables (homeless, drunks, criminals, people in debtors' prison, etc.), but I can't quite remember what it was called.
Oh, wait, it was AMERICA.
PP
"I remember a place where the British used to send their undesirables (homeless, drunks, criminals, people in debtors' prison, etc.), but I can't quite remember what it was called.
Oh, wait, it was AMERICA."
or was it Australia?
compassion or greed?
Over 140 thousand each to treat? Looks more like greedy people not wanting funding cut. If it were because they care and want to help them, why charge 140 thousand each? Just more greedy people wanting a better paycheck than they could get working.
I do not mean to imply they do nothing in exchange for the 1.4 million dollars. I do question all the money they make, yet the problem continues as if nobody is doing anything about it.
Lets have a look at the organizations budgets. Are we just paying them to study, talk and plan?
@ThatDude: it was both.
@ThatDude: it was both. America was first. Then we got all uppity so they started shipping everyone to Australia.
But my point was that the society which chose not to be responsible for its less fortunate ended up being surpassed by those same people they abandoned.