Recently, Canada reopened a commission set up to investigate the collapse of a sockeye salmon run in British Columbia’s Fraser River in 2009. The Cohen Commission reopened for three days in December to hear testimony about the potential link of Infectious Salmon Anemia virus, or ISAv, to the collapse.
The commission was reacting to several reports of farmed and wild salmon testing positive for the infectious salmon anemia virus. The virus is known to be deadly to Atlantic salmon. British Columbia has an Atlantic salmon farming industry worth millions of dollars. Pacific salmon, like Alaska’s chinook, sockeye and coho, do not express symptoms of the disease.
However, scientists are concerned that the ISAv, an influenza-like virus, could mutate like its cousins avian influenza and swine flu.
The British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture has said that in more than 7,000 tests, the Canadian government has not found a single case of Infectious Salmon Anemia virus or symptoms of the ISA disease.
Whistleblowers at the Cohen Commission, however, dispute this, saying the government has known of ISAv in Canadian farmed fish since as early as 2004.
An email that surfaced during the hearings revealed AquaBounty’s Prince Edward Island facility in eastern Canada may have tested positive for Infectious Salmon Anemia virus, or ISAv in 2009. AquaBounty is the maker of AquAdvantage genetically engineered salmon.
In an email submitted to the commission, Canada’s Fisheries and Oceans reports a positive test for ISAv to the country’s Food Inspection Agency.
“On 25 November, 2009 samples obtained from a research facility at Fortune, Prince Edward Island tested positive for Salmon Anemia virus at our lab,” director of biotechnology and aquatic animal health science brand at Fisheries and Oceans Stephen J. Stephen of Ottawa wrote in an email to Dr. Brian Evans, chief veterinary officer for Canada’s Food Inspection Agency.
Activist and researcher Alex Morton said she has found ISAv in over a dozen wild and farmed salmon in the Fraser River. She said many of the salmon she had tested came from specimens that died before breading and showed signs of ISAv-related disease.
A post-graduate student named Molly Kibenge said she found the virus early as 2004.
Genetic engineering, or genetic modification, is the direct manipulation of an organism’s deoxyribonucleic acid — DNA. DNA’s double helix, discovered by Nobel Prize winners James D. Watson and Francis Crick, holds four bases, molecules with the names Adenine, Guanine, Thymine, Cytosine. Scientists manipulate the sequence of these bases to engineer new genetic information. In the case of the AquAdvantage salmon, the changes cause rapid growth. Bacteria were the first genetically engineered organisms, in 1973.
AquaBounty does not plan to raise its own salmon, preferring instead to sell its patented eggs to inland farms. However, the biotech firm raised AquAdvantage salmon for research at its facility on Prince Edward Island in eastern Canada.
AquaBounty’s facility was reported to raise Atlantic salmon crossed with Pacific chinook salmon and a northwest Atlantic ocean pout. The engineered salmon adopts some of the genes the pout uses to make its antifreeze to keep its chinook growth hormone running.
The biotech firm says its facilities are isolated inland — AquaBounty also sends eggs to Panama for grow-out research.
As an added precaution to keep its product from escaping into the wild, AquaBounty said its genetically modified Atlantic salmon would be 98 percent female, lowering the chance of reproduction in the wild.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is investing nearly $500,000 to attempt to improve on that 98 percent.
“This project would research technologies that would render fish sterile to decrease the risk of gene flow from transgene fish,” according to the USDA.
• Contact reporter Russell Stigall at 523-2276 or at russell.stigall@juneauempire.com.

genetic editing
This article makes an abrupt jump in the middle, from talking about the salmon virus to talking about genetically engineered fish. Almost like two separate species of salmon articles were genetically edited to create a single frankenarticle. Hopefully this unholy creation isn't allowed to reproduce.
However, I think the interesting issue with the genetically engineered fish with both Atlantic and Pacific genes is... would this somehow create a pathway for the Atlantic salmon virus (and other Atlantic diseases) to jump across to our Pacific stock? Could the diseases more easily mutate in the hybrid fish, causing a threat to our fishery?
A very confused article...
There seems to be a lot of disjointed information in this article. Apparently the focus of this article is to scare people. It melts a bunch of problems together that have no connection other than fish are involved. Really, before you write a article, you should have a specific point to make before you ramble on about the dark side of fish and biology. There is so much more than meets the eye about each topic you touch on in this article, the general public will have a hard time getting any real facts out of it. You could write at least a half dozen articles on the subjects mentioned in this article, but you have better have your references listed, as knowing what you are writing about is quite different from quoting sound bites.
I think Latitude58 has a good
I think Latitude58 has a good point, the modified fish with both Atlantic and Pacific DNA may be just the bridge that the disease needs to jump from one species to the other. Courting disaster for our fisheries, we will be the losers in the end.
ravenaquak
Disjointed
But dots that may possibly be connected. Frankenfish, farmed fish, infected wild and/or hatchery stocks. The most perplexing thing about this is the possibility of a government coverup. Why? Surely the Canadian politicians aren't subject to lobbying by the aquaculture industry and the monetary benefits of passing laws that support it? Nah! Too American, eh? If this virus reaches Bristol Bay, they'll wish they had a mine to mitigate the economic impact.
Quite the conspiracy, skirkz!
Since Pebble is Canadian-owned, it's obvious the Canadian mining industry is engineering a salmon virus to wipe out the Bristol stock so opposition to Pebble will be wiped out as well.
You have an evil mind, Mr. skirkzy.
Who's the conspiracy theorist?
You sure do know how to take a question and run with it, Lat. I question why the Canadian gov. is trying to keep a wrap on an outbreak and you turn it into corporate scheme. I seriously doubt that this virus is engineered. I only mentioned Bristol Bay as a potential impact.
You're the one with an evil mind.
Hollywood plot.
As long as you're writing a script for a movie, why not have Big Pharma engineer a virus to infect salmon stocks at a pandemic level and hold the farmed, hatchery and wild fisheries hostage by forcing them to buy the pre-manufactured antidote? You could even throw in warring Pharma cartels fighting turf wars for control of the distribution stream by stream. Mining corporations would be concocting their own counterfeit cure in order to keep the fishery opposition from succeeding in order to plunder spawning habitat for minerals and metals whith the plan of leaving environmental disasters for another subsidiary of the same conglomerate to rake in billions in government subsidies for superfund cleanup contracts. Of course they would have their own hardhat wearing goons. You could clean up at the box-office.
You guys watch to much T.V.
...'Nuff said...
what is the verdict
was their a virus crossover or what?
aka