Juneau Sen. Dennis Egan was the victim of what’s known as “phone cramming,” unauthorized charges placed on his phone bill by unrelated companies.
“I got nailed, and it was bizarre for me trying to get off this — they just keep billing you,” he said.
Now, Egan, D-Juneau, has joined with several other Democratic senators to introduce legislation trying to keep that from happening to other Alaskans.
Joining Egan in sponsoring Senate Bill 138 are Sens. Bill Wielechowski, Bettye Davis and Johnny Ellis, all fellow Democrats from Anchorage.
The FCC estimates that 15 million to 20 million households may have unauthorized charges on their landline bills each year, with charges ranging from $1.99 to as much as $19.99 a month. The agency says most people have no clue the charges are there because they appear with vague wording such as “voicemail,” “service charge” or “other fees.” On mobile phone bills, the charges may appear as downloads for services that were never actually downloaded, or as subscription charges for what users thought was a single purchase, perhaps for a weather alert or ringtone, the senators said.
“Consumers often don’t spot the small monthly fees, but even when they do getting refunds can be a nightmare,” Wielechowski said. “The telephone provider that sends the bills often refuses to issue refunds, instead referring consumers to the third-party firms, which are often unresponsive.”
That’s the system Egan described as “bizarre,” and is what made him eager to join the effort to stop unethical billing practices.
The process begins when consumers are solicited for free trials, coupons, prices and they’re not told clearly that there will be a bill involved.
The Democrats’ bill is modeled after legislation passed last year in Vermont.
Since the state of Alaska has regulatory authority over landlines and wireless service providers in rural Alaska that are carriers of last resort, the legislation would target cramming as it relates to those services, the senators said.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (11)
Add commentGood for Dennis. I'm glad to
Good for Dennis. I'm glad to see a politician taking care of a serious issue. I'd love to see more of these nickle-and-dime leach operations taken down.
Pass more laws?
Dennis "got nailed....bizarre..."; humm--what kind of phone services does he use? Too bad he doesn't have a parental control option on his service.
old school
whats a land line???
Dont stop there
Dont stop there. How about ambiguous charges on cable bills, electric bills and the worst of all medical bills. BIlling companies purposely make bills confusing and hard to read.
Until it happens to them...
...legislators don't give this sort of thing a second look.
golly gee Dennis...
I am sorry this happened to you; I'm glad it happened to you too...
Good to see some of our leaders experiencing what the common man suffers most days. Good luck with getting the credit!
Charges?
I have had a a whole list of ambiguous charges showing up on my bill every month for years and have never been able to get rid of them. I keep calling the service provider and they keep telling me that those are "Taxes"......
On his level
Blizzzare, nailed! Egan's a cool man.
And understands common problems.
Hope all pans out.
From fcc.gov - July 12, 2011
From fcc.gov - July 12, 2011 -
"Today, the FCC has proposed rules that would help consumers prevent cramming, or detect it and seek redress when it happens."
So what exactly do Egan and others hope to achieve with more rules - redundancy and bigger government?
Waste of time and money - I say...
Great Move
ACS kept charging me for a service I didn't receive. They refused to take it off my bill. When I sent a letter to the FCC the charges miraculously disappeared.
It had to happen three times before ACS offered me the call block that would prevent third parties from using my phone number to charge long distance to.
Glad to hear that our legislators are taking a look at these ridiculous practices.
I found some charges on my
I found some charges on my ACS bill from some third party in the lower 48. Couldn't ever get a hold of the third party but I did discover they had a history of tacking charges onto people's phone bills.
I told ACS that the charges were fraudulent and that I wasn't going to pay them and that if they did not disappear from my bill I was going to cancel my service.
The charges disappeared.
The bottom line to me was: how much money was ACS willing to spend to collect a $50 charge from me because I was never going to write that check. They just need to police these jerks better.