Buoys that once held strings of farmed oysters in Japan are washing up on the shore in Yakutat. Visible specimen of debris float in the Pacific Ocean, carried there by the earthquake-induced tsunami that washed over coastal Japan in early 2011.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski plans to hold a tsunami debris fact-finding roundtable to address this recent wave of debris and to prepare for the debris wave NOAA has predicted will arrive in Alaska in 2013. The event, “Our Coastlines are the Frontlines” will be webcast statewide from 10:30-11:30 a.m. Friday from the University of Alaska Anchorage.
The task force will have the goal of assessing the impact to Alaska by Japan’s tsunami by “exploring what debris has been found and informing the public discussion on moving forward,” a release from Murkowski’s office states.
“It has been nearly a year since the earthquake and tsunami in Japan caused a tragic loss of life and property,” Murkowski said, “and Alaskans know that our coastlines are the frontlines in terms of dealing with some of the effects. Alaskans need to hear what is being seen and what is being done and that’s the reason I am bringing together state, federal and industry experts.”
Murkowski’s experts are Peter Murphy, Alaska coordinator for the NOAA Marine Debris Program; Kristin Ryan, environmental health director for the state of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, and Dave Gaudet, Marine Debris Program coordinator for the Marine Conservation Alliance Foundation
The Marine Conservation Alliance Foundation will present its new program to monitor Japan’s tsunami debris that end up on Alaska’s shores. The foundation plans to conduct weekly surveys in Craig, Sitka, Yakutat and Kodiak.
And it could turn out to be a long-term project. The Ocean Surface Current Simulator model of tsunami debris simulation predicts a second wave of debris arriving in Alaska in 2013.
The foundation’s results will be posted online.
“The monitoring program is designed to examine beaches in a systematic manner and tabulate the number of objects arriving on Alaska beaches,” Gaudet said.
Sen. Mark Begich is attempting to boost debris monitoring and cleanup through legislation.
“Residents of Alaska and other western coastal states are understandably concerned by the estimated 25 million tons of debris swept into the North Pacific during last year’s devastating tsunami which hit northern Japan,” Begich stated in a press release.
In a letter to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrator Jane Lubchenco dated Tuesday, the senator asked about the Obama Administration’s plans to deal with tsunami debris. He asked for an outline of how $1 million in Marine Debris program funds would be spent. The Marine Debris program is reauthorized by Sen. Daniel Inouye’s Trash Free Seas Act, which Begich co-signed.
Begich also asked NOAA for an update on the status of the debris field and latest projections of transit times, response planning, dealing with potentially hazardous waste, public outreach and communications plan.
For more information about the debris fact-finding task force contact Sen. Murkowski’s press office at (202) 224-9301 or (202) 224-8069, or visit www.murkowski.senate.gov.
Watch the webcast at http://bit.ly/xqh5Qt.
• Contact reporter Russell Stigall at 523-2276 or at russell.stigall@juneauempire.com.

Comments (9)
Add commentIf Lisa just waits awhile...
...a round table will come washing up. A square table will too.
It'll be like a sand flea market out there!
Uh???
We know the trash is on its way but the article didn't tell me why we need to keep a million dollar eye on um. What is the impact if we do nothing and just clean um up when they arrive?
Because it might be
Because it might be radioactive?
Marine pollution
It seems to me the dispersal of Japanese debris from the earthquakes got a head start into the currents before radioactive material entered the sea.
I'm not an ecotoxicologist, but I'd be very surprised if the debris landing in Alaska will be dangerously contaminated.
Radioactive consequences on the food web from plankton climbing to marine mammals however, should be getting a Round Table concern now rather (or at least concurrently) than beach litter.
To my knowledge, NOAA is not monitoring marine radiation from Japan.
Mike
Oh! Don't worry about the radiation...
...It's been rinsed off by now. By oodles of saltwater. No worries. Just take your own giger counter to the store with you when you go to buy seafood. They won't put one in the processing plant.
What about Japan ?
I must be missing something here, Shouldnt the people of Japan or their governement have some sort of say in this? If they are so noble and just that they pride themselves on the fact that there was little or no looting after the earthquake and tsunami you'd think they would be noble and just enough to offer clean up efforts for their junk and possible body parts washing up on our shores!
radiation find
I'd be more worried about airborne fall out, the rest is beach combing fodder. So ms mookowski why are we wasting a million dollars we need to get from China?
AlaskanStyle, that's an interesting point
A quick search found that there is a marine pollution fund of some billions of dollars associated with the United Nations however, historically this appears aimed at oil spills.
Still, it's as good as a question as any, why wouldn't the government of Japan be responsible in some part for the clean up?
On a different note, I'd like to amend my earlier comment regarding beach litter. After some research, I discovered that there is great importance and sorrow attributed to the personal effects that are beginning to wash up on foreign shores. Sentimental and cultural value for these effects, as well as for the dead have resulted in people from Japan traveling to our coasts paying respects and sadly looking for signs of their former world. I should not have called the flotsam mere "beach litter" and for that I apologize if it offended anyone.
Mike
Why
Can't It be a "Square" table for a change? I am really getting sick of "Round Tables".