An 18-year-old Hoonah man is facing multiple felony charges of possession and distribution of child pornography after “sexting” with his then-17-year-old girlfriend.
Hoonah police found that Greggory C. Wright received “pornographic” text messages on his cell phone from his ex-girlfriend when she was a minor. He then forwarded some of the pictures along to another person after they had broken up, according to charging documents.
Wright pleaded not guilty to the charges through his attorney Thomas Collins before Juneau Superior Court Judge Philip Pallenberg on Tuesday. Wright participated in the hearing telephonically from Hoonah Correctional Facility where he is being held on $10,000 bail. A judge has since ordered his transfer to Lemon Creek Correctional Center.
Court documents show Wright was arrested on Jan. 25 and now faces two counts of distribution of child pornography for the two pictures he forwarded along to his friend, as well as eight counts of possession of child pornography, one count for each picture on his phone.
Distribution and possession of child pornography are both felony offenses that can carry a sentence of up to 99 years in prison. The presumptive sentencing range for distribution is five to 15 years for first-time offenders and two to 12 years for possession.
Sexting is defined in general parlance as sending text messages or sexually explicit images by cell phones. The word itself is not a legal term in Alaska and it is not specifically defined or prohibited in Alaska statutes, although the state Legislature created a new statute last year to make sending an electronic explicit image or video of a minor with the intent to "annoy or humiliate another person" a misdemeanor offense. That statute became effective on July 1, 2011. Wright has not been charged with that misdemeanor.
District Attorney David Brower could not comment on the case itself, but said generally speaking that a case such as this has not come up in court before during his tenure as the DA.
“I think sexting seems to be common just as a general thing I’ve read about on the Internet, but around here it doesn’t seem to be,” he said.
Brower continued to say that many terms used in general terminology may not show up in state statutes, although the elements of sexting are referenced in statutes such as the distribution of child pornography, the unlawful exploitation of a minor and the new “sending an explicit image of a minor” offense.
The charges against Wright originated from a felony complaint filed by a Hoonah police officer. The police officer wrote up the 10 charges and forwarded them to the DA’s office, which is the routine procedure in Southeast Alaska when a crime occurs in one of the Panhandle’s villages.
The District Attorney’s Office can always amend the charges the police officer recommended.
Hoonah police had obtained search warrants for Wright’s iPhone in mid-January after he had been identified as a suspect in a burglary case. Thirty-three cartons of cigarettes and two boxes of chocolate bars were stolen from a Hoonah grocery store called Colette’s Cupboard in early January, and police had tied Wright to the scene of the crime.
Wright has consistently denied his involvement in the burglary itself, but admitted to police he tried to sell the stolen merchandise through text messages on his iPhone, according to charging documents. A police officer found the explicit texts while searching the phone for evidence of the burglary and the subsequent distribution of the stolen goods, the complaint states.
Police interviewed the girl, who is now 18, and she admitted taking the photographs and sending them to Wright in December at his request, the complaint states.
The complaint specifies that Wright told police they had dated for a period of time, but broke off the relationship because she was a minor.
In court, Wright waived his right to a preliminary hearing and his right to a speedy trial for 30 days. That essentially puts the case on hold for 30 days so attorneys can discuss how to proceed. If the case proceeds, it will likely be through a grand jury handing up an indictment.
While the sexting case is on hold, the Colette’s Cupboard burglary case is still going ahead. Wright was indicted on Friday on four felony charges of burglary, theft, criminal mischief and tampering with physical evidence for allegedly stealing about $2,000 worth of merchandise from the store, including cartons of Camel, Marlboro, Winston and Newport cigarettes and Hershey and Butterfinger candy bars. The estimated wholesale value of the lost merchandise is estimated at $2,041.20, and damage to the store’s door is expected to exceed $500, according to an affidavit filed by Hoonah police.
Wright pleaded not guilty to the charges during Tuesday’s arraignment. If convicted, he could face up to five years of jail time for each of those four felony charges and up to a $50,000 fine for each count. The presumptive range for those offenses is zero to two years for a first felony conviction. A four-day trial in that case is scheduled to begin on May 7.
• Contact reporter Emily Russo Miller at 523-2263 or at emily.miller@juneauempire.com.
Editor’s Note: The following story has been amended to fix incorrect presumptive sentencing ranges and has been updated to include more information on ‘sexting’ statutes in Alaska.





Comments (26)
Add commentInjustice reigns
What he did was wrong, very wrong, but if he gets 10 years in jail and Brian Ervin gets 4 years, the injustice will be glaring and racism will be a serious suspicion.
Off the rails
A 17-year-old voluntarily sending her 18-year-old boyfriend naughty pictures...and he could end up in prison for 60 years? Sorry, but that's ludicrous.
Yes, it was tacky of him to forward the pictures to others. Yes, it was stupid of her to take them and send them digitally in the first place. But I simply don't see a crime being committed here. I do see the cops in Hoonah over-reaching.
Sad this man could get more
Sad this man could get more time than a child molesting cocaine dealer, all for opening his text mail.
Girls don’t send photos of yourself you may find them on YouTube.
we'll see
I know officers were and had to do their job. That is not what is in question. Nor is the fact that he stole from an honest company during very hard times for all. But now it is up to the court to realize this is a mistake between two young people. And if this young man does hard time while John Marvin got off for killing two police officers, then something is wrong.
Did she
"she admitted taking the photographs and sending them "
What charge is she faceing?
I agree with Latitude
He was 18, she was 17. Both were above the age of consent which is 16.
Just who is the victim in this "crime?"
Also, if she was 17 and sent the messages, can a child possess child pornography? Of course they can! Not only that, she seems to have been the creator!
Does it seem to me, that cops and media are slobbering to pounce on any "crime" that contains any element of nudity or sex?
There is no real crime here. There are no real victims here.
But as such, this young man faces life as a felon, and on a sexual offender registry which means he'll never get a job, and he'll be on welfare the rest of his life, and he will cost taxpayers bazillions while in prison.
The prosecuting attorney needs to re-think this. Otherwise, the taxpayers end up being the victim here.
Roomates
Put him in a cell with Marvin,They can share stories about Huna fot the next 30 years.
I agree with the others -
I agree with the others - delete the pictures and move on to the burglary charges. I think the girl might be a little upset that he forwarded her pictures to others - a bonehead move to be sure - but she shouldn't have sent them to him in the first place! Let's focus on the real crime here.
hahahha sweet, he gets
hahahha sweet, he gets jailtime for this, when there is an ex cop that molested his daughter basically getting a slap on the wrist..
I agree with mayflower1950
But for Eric Ervin coming forward at Brian Ervin's sentencing hearing, the cop would have skated with a one-year to serve sentence which was then doubled but still the same plea deal of not being charged for the sex crime.
A 17 year old girl admits she willingly sent photos of herself--not the brightest move--and Wright forwarded them to others--a very tacky move--and he faces more jail time than Brian Ervin. And to classify it as "child pornography" when the girl was 17 in December and is now 18 years old--give me a break!
A 17 year old girl can get an abortion without her parents being notified but when it comes to nude photos, she's a child. Go figure. Juneau justice at its best.
Too much time on someone's hands
Wow, while there is probably a bit here that we aren't privy to, it would seem to me law enforcement ought to focus on the aspect of this case that merits charges. Sorry, sexting doesn't seem to merit pursuit in this instance.
Ridiculous. If he gets
Ridiculous. If he gets convicted of this he will be a registered sex offender for life. He won't be able to get a job, rent an apartment.. the list goes on and on. Because his girlfriend sent him a picture? Hopefully the prosecution does not try to ruin his life in that way. Yes, sexting is not smart, but should not be punished to that extreme. They BOTH made a mistake.
Selective enforcement
I do not like selective enforcement of any law(s). There is no special class of those who get a pass and those who do not. I do not know why the law was written and passed as it exist. What I do know is laws can be changed and until they are they need to be equably enforced and not simply allow the court of public opinion decide who should or should not be prosecuted.
Forwarding pictures was wrong
Forwarding pictures was wrong and should be punished.
If they try to nail him on him and GF sexting each other..then enforcement need to be educated.
boob
For all we know, it could have been a picture of a boob.
I disagree with islander above. There are times when crimes should be prosecuted and times when they should not. This is one of those times when it should not.
There is a big difference between a couple sending a picture of a boob through a cell phone, and a perv surfing cyberspace for real child pornography.
Do we honestly think these are the only two teens in Alaska who engage in this?
This is sensationalism. There is no real crime here.
Something is broken when the
Something is broken when the overloaded DA's office thinks twice about bringing charges for this. Of course they are probably just hanging this over the kids head to get him to cop to the burbling charge. Then again they may just want to see the "exhibits."
My concern is
they were accessing his phone re a burglary they had no right to take/use anything else found without a warrant detailing the other items. An over zealous cop looking for points.
The girl should be charged for distributing child pornagraphy as well.
Juneau has already set the precedent, child molesters get a walk here, texting is dont by MOST teens anyore. That is more prevelant than child molesters and way down the ladder crime wise. So a texter should get the appropriate lesser penalty something like both participants lose thier camera phone and have no access to any type photo equipment until thier an adult.
or
Erwin should be seeing 25 years per incident and quit insulting the victim to protect the perpetrator.
OMG !!!!! RRRREAAALLLYY
What is wrong with our system anyway when RAPIST Officer's of the law who are supposed to serve and PROTECT, CAN RAPE LIKE ONE MENTIONED ABOVE GETS A FRICKEN SLAP ON THE HAND. These are two (2) normal teenager's that were merely flirting and having fun the "EMPIRE" and the reporter turned it into something dirty this poor kid thanks to the "EMPIRE" has now been scared for 'LIFE" good job screw up two teenager's
If this is an example case
If this is an example case then she needs to be charged to. @ 17 maybe as an adult
HUNA
Does anyone here realize that Hoonah will sufffer for this...more negitive media to add to a town suffering from bad headlines, Hoonah man shoots, Hoonah man steals, Hoonah man Sexting, Hoonah man dies of cancer...people out there read these news clips...and i wonder what they think of the poor little village by the cliff.
Two in the Wrong
What both of the teens did was wrong. They both committed felonies. Without her felonious act he would have been unable to posses or distribute the child pornography. Both teens could be considered sex offenders-you don’t have to be an adult to be a sex offender. The law does not say it is ok to send child pornography of yourself to others but rather says you cannot send any child pornography. She should at least be charged with something like disorderly conduct-a mere slap on the wrist that wouldn’t carry any jail time.
Child Pornography
Kids may not realize how serious the crime is... but so many of you write about rules that don't exist, like, "If she was 15, yes, but 17...."
Well the age is 18.
She passed along pornography and he did, too.
What is "real" child pornography? That's like asking when is a fetus a baby. No one can agree. So let's say 18 and stick with it.
Let's not loosen up on the child pornography laws - I for one am glad to see that underage children are being protected.
Laughable middle
"I for one am glad to see that underage children are being protected".
Really?
Great thinking Middle. Stay focused on this child now made porn star by this secret Juneau Empire article....or how does this work?
Maybe we don't know who this little girl is, but I am pretty sure half of Hoonah does...especially now. We sure protected her huh? I can't think of a worst place to discuss what these children did than the front page of the local newspaper.
And shame on Hoonah Police and DA for stacking the deck in this manner. You certainly made the little girl feel like she is protected.
sheesh....
Smh
This is has got to be the dumbest thing I ever read.
This wouldn't even be considered news south of this state.
Brian Ervin would of been thrown in jail to rot but since the justice system is a joke he'll walk in a few years and this kid will still be in jail. And Mr. Bag gets free trips in and out of the country...
@Jo
How could it not be a picture of a BOOB? Any seventeen year old who would send nude photo's of themselves meets the definition of "BOOB" perfectly.