University of Alaska Southeast Chancellor John Pugh said there will be no investigation by the school of plagiarism allegations against Dean of Students Jessie L. Grant, who has resigned.
An article in the Whalesong student newspaper this week noted the “uncanny similarity” between an article published under Grant’s name in the Capital City Weekly and a previously-published article in Boston.
The possible plagiarism is not a university issue, Pugh said.
“This is not an academic article, so it is not an academic issue,” he said.
The article, about the origin of gospel music, was written on behalf of Juneau’s Black Awareness Association for an event co-sponsored by the university.
“It was not written as a university article,” Pugh said.
The Capital City Weekly article was published in February.
Sherry Patterson, president of the association, refused to comment and hung up on a reporter. Grant is vice-president of the association.
Pugh notified the campus on April 2 that Grant submitted his resignation after have having been at the school for 2 1/2 years, though he made no mention of the reasons for Grant’s departure.
“After thorough consideration, I have accepted the resignation because I believe it is in the best interest of the university,” he said.
Pugh told the campus in a memorandum Grant would no longer be dean of students “effective immediately.”
Grant’s resignation letter, sent to Pugh on March 30, said he would be resigning as dean of students effective May 11.
Pugh said Grant continued teaching a class through the end of the term, which ends today.
Grant is no longer in the university directory and was unavailable for comment.
Pugh said Grant’s resignation letter cited no reason for leaving, but that he has spoken of family issues.
“He told me that he had some personal reasons for resigning and that his mom had been ill, hospitalized with renal failure,” he said.
Pugh acknowledged there had been calls within the university for an inquiry into the allegations about the article.
With Grant’s departure there will be no investigation of plagiarism allegations, which may have happened had he stayed, Pugh said.
Human Resources Director Kirk McAllister said he did not know why Grant departed.
“People leave for whatever reason,” he said.
Pugh’s memo to the university dealt mostly with moving forward, stating Dean of Enrollment Services Joe Nelson will assume supervisory responsibilities for the Student Resource Center and Stephanie Self will serve as interim director of Student Housing and Activities.
Grant’s resignation letter referred to his “three year tenure” at UAS and said he was proud to work with faculty, staff and students who “taught me many things about myself and higher education administration.”
He said he would “transition back to the Lower 48 to be with my family at this time.”
Among the issues Grant dealt with as dean of students was enforcement of the university’s plagiarism policy, and he had recently worked with the Faculty Senate on a system of tracking offenses.
That’s something Grant may not have to worry about himself. Pugh said future employers calling for information about Grant’s performance at UAS wouldn’t necessarily be told about the plagiarism allegation.
“From our viewpoint, and from our attorney’s view point, we do not have any responsibility to any future employer,” Pugh said.
At the university, and in the community, Grant played a positive role, he said.
“We thank him for his service, he did some really good things as dean,” Pugh said.
Grant holds a Bachelor of Science in sociology from Kent State University, a master’s degree in counselor education from the University of Iowa and a Ph.D. from Western Michigan University.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com





Comments (5)
Add commentLimbo, limbo, lim-bo!!
An accusation of plagiarism has no bearing at UAS? And the bar of academic expectations ticks down another notch.
'Move along, nothing to see
'Move along, nothing to see here...'
UAS *does* take plagiarism seriously!
The UAS administration obviously can not disclose the details of why Grant "resigned" for legal reasons. Though statements like "The possible plagiarism is not a university issue" sound dismissive, Chancellor Pugh's statements were probably made with legal counsel in mind. If the plagiarism offense was not investigated and Grant was given the option of resigning rather than being fired, technically UAS could not say he was let go due to plagiarism. The same goes for giving references to future employers...it could leave the university open to lawsuits. That said, the staff, faculty and administration (not to mention the students) apparently *do* feel that plagiarism is a serious offense, as Mr. Grant no longer has a job.
Maybe he had a better job
Maybe he had a better job offer somewhere else. Or, maybe he had to go back wherever he came from to take care of his sick aunt.
What's the big deal about some guy quitting his job?
Failure of integrity
Details of such incidences as reported here are instructive. See, "Is Accreditation a Reliable Authority on Academic Quality" by Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., DBA (Accounting with a minor in Logic and Ethics), Professor, School of Accountancy, College of Business, University of Southern Mississippi. It is available online free at http://ssrn.com/author=397169.
Abstract
During preparations for reaccreditation, a colleague noticed that the College Accreditation Committee represented other Colleges’ documents as their own. He consulted several faculty including this researcher. We advised the Dean and Committee that the documents were without attribution. The events were immediately identified as an opportunity to test social reality - the reliability - of institutions’ and leaders’ behavior vis-à-vis the institution’s representations. (See, DePree, "A General Theory to Test Social Reality.") The Dean and Committee members ignored requests to discuss the copied documents. Subsequently, the Dean submitted the questionable materials to the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) during reaccreditation. After internal efforts, both informal and formal, to discuss the documents failed, faculty informed the AACSB that the documents were copied “without proper citation” - a term used by faculty who copied other school’s documents. The actions of the AACSB inform their constituency and public of a neglected dimension of accreditation: What does the AACSB do when challenged with evidence of alleged violations of its standards? In other words, is the AACSB a reliable authority on academic quality?
Faculty and administrators had choices of well-known university and accreditation principles and rules to follow or refuse to follow as the events unfolded. The choices and evidence in this report support the conclusion that accreditation is not a reliable authority on academic quality.