A 42-year-old driver who police say was distracted and took his eyes off the road rolled his vehicle on Egan Drive on Monday afternoon. The driver, whose name wasn’t released, was taken to the hospital for treatment of non-life threatening injuries.
Police said in a release they responded to the crash at the 8-mile mark of Egan at about 3:12 p.m.
An investigation determined the distracted driver drove off the shoulder of the road and struck a light pole. He then over-corrected, driving across both inbound lanes of Egan Drive. The vehicle rolled onto its side in the median, the release said.
The vehicle was totaled, and the driver was cited with negligent driving, according to the release.
The accident shut down one inbound and one outbound lane of Egan Drive for about 30 minutes.





Comments (15)
Add commentHummm....
Distracted by a cell phone, text message or checking his Facebook?
Just wonderin.....
well ???????
They said it was a male so (maybe??) you can take putting on makeup off the list....... my bet is with you Mama T on the cell?
Maybe:
Maybe a nagging wife.
Nagging is a word created by
Nagging is a word created by people who aren't doing what they're supposed to do. People wouldn't need to "nag" if the other person would do what they're supposed to do in the first place.....
OK JNUKara
So you weren't nagging when the old man rolled the truck...we get it...glad no one was hurt....
I think what Milspec. is
I think what Milspec. is trying to say is that he was the driver and he crashed because he was peeved at his wife for asking him to spend less time polishing his "gun" and more time doing household chores, such as cleaning the toilet when he leaves it in a miserable state (most mornings), or washing the dishes instead of piling them up on the counter, or stopping by the store on the way home from work when he knows damn well that they're out of milk.
JNUKara
What an interesting feminist way of interpreting a word.
Nagging is someone constantly attempting to get someone else to do what they (the nagger) wants.
ie; Persnickeny, wants a man to do what she wants and feels important irregardless of what the man wants.
Typeical femist interpretation and view.
And a typical post from you both. 8)
I'm a guy, slegnawons. But
I'm a guy, slegnawons. But let's talk about feminism for a moment. There are many different schools of feminist thought, but at their essence, they all boil down to removing the institutional barriers that prevent women from achieving social, economic, and political parity with men.
One of those barriers is sexism, which you have so thoughtfully demonstrated here. Thanks for that. You must be proud. Your mother, too, I'll bet.
Now, often men hold these sexist views because they look at how things used to be--when women lacked rights, when men had all sorts of extra privileges--and think that they are still entitled to the benefits their forefathers had, such as being able to force your wife into having sex (it was impossible to be criminally charged for raping a spouse until the 1970's--it still is impossible in some states), or being in complete control over the household (bringing in all the income yourself makes it awfully hard for your wife to leave you if you're a bad person), or simply being able to disregard a woman's opinion.
Of course, this really makes these men spoiled little babies who care less about women as people and more about women as pets or objects to be possessed and controlled.
And some men just have a chip on their shoulder due to bad past experiences, which is a pretty selfish attitude considering women, on the whole, have had to (and still do--how many men complain about creepy women not leaving them alone or are ever afraid of being raped?) endure a lot more [filtered word] from men than the other way around.
Thanks for illustrating a very serious issue, slegnawons. I'm sure this was your intention--to provide insight, not to be a whiny little man-child who doesn't understand what a "connotation" is and how it applies to language.
Lighten up:
Interesting how a simple comment’ a joke at that has taken off like it has. Lighten up.
NAGs, as opposed to NOW
National Organization of Gals, according to Rush Limbaugh.
men nag too
PP I wouldn't have thought you to be sexist... Disappointing.
Men nag, b p & m too. They suffer from monthly mood swings as well.
As for shopping addiction.... they have that too. Just because you got it at Napa or off craigslist doesn't make it essential or a bargain.
@Ivmykyk: I'm disappointed
@Ivmykyk: I'm disappointed that you don't know what a "connotation" is, either. A "connotation" is an association we make with a word that is not part of its dictionary definition. The words "arrogant," "conceited," "pompous," and "haughty" all mean the same thing. The meanings we associate with them are not all the same. A royal wedding is "pompous" but not conceited; a student arguing with his teacher is "arrogant" but not haughty; this post is "condescending" but not pretentious; and so on. You can open up a thesaurus and compare most words with their synonyms.
In our culture, the word "nag" is associated with women. In fact, I'd venture to guess that men are ONLY referred to as nags in discussions such as this, when one side wants to think that because a dictionary definition of a word isn't innately sexist, the word must not be sexist at all.
Not a good guess
Where I come from that term is used regardless of gender. Although the b word is used more frequently for the incessant nannering. But maybe I am just from a more progressive area than you.
I prefer to ignore gender or race inferences. Responses like yours help perpetuate them. Gives them something to argue back at. Like a middle school clique battle.
pp
congrats you finally got the insurance to pay for the change persistence pays off
I learned something on this
I learned something on this thread, I too thought PP was a gal...who knew?