The jury trial for the 26-year-old Juneau man accused of murder after a fatal car crash on Glacier Highway last summer was pushed back once again.
Slated to begin next week, attorneys on Monday asked for more time since they are still awaiting DNA results from the crime lab in Anchorage.
District Attorney David Brower told the judge he expected the results last week, but the lab was having software problems.
Juneau Superior Court Judge Louis Menendez vacated the May 21 trial start date, and scheduled the parties to meet that day to discuss how to proceed.
Ryan W. West is charged with second-degree murder for knowingly engaging in conduct that resulted in 19-year-old Gabriel Carte’s death on June 6, 2011.
The state alleges West was driving his Dodge truck near Mile 32 on Glacier Highway when it crashed, but West claims Carte was driving at the time.
West’s attorney David Seid, moved to dismiss the indictment, but Menendez denied that motion Friday.
Menendez ruled the state presented inadmissible evidence to the grand jury in August when it allowed two witnesses to testify West does not allow others to drive his truck.
But, Menendez wrote, the remaining admissible evidence was legally sufficient to support the indictment.
“The evidence regarding Mr. West’s refusal to let others drive is arguably prejudicial, but the admissible evidence is highly probative and not outweighed by any prejudicial effect of the inadmissible evidence,” Menendez wrote.
Menendez also concluded that there was enough evidence to support the second-degree murder charge, which Seid argued should only be reserved for cases where there is extreme intoxication with egregious driving conduct. West testified at the grand jury he only had two beers, and he had a blood alcohol content level equivalent to .071, which is under the .08 limit, according to court documents.
“A grand jury proceeding is not intended to be a mini-trial in which the state presents all evidence necessary to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,” Menendez wrote. “The prosecutor’s burden is to introduce sufficient evidence to establish probability of guilt.”
The judge noted police officers testified at the grand jury hearing West was driving somewhere between 74 and 83 miles per hour at the time of the crash, in a 40-miles-per-hour zone. A warning sign indicating the speed limit and a turn was posted about one-fourth of a mile before the turn where West’s Dodge lost control, one officer, Sgt. Paul Hatch, testified.
An expert in accident reconstruction and occupant kinematics, Charles Lewis of TechRecon, Inc. in Port Orchard, Wash., also testified at the grand jury, saying the passenger, not the driver, would have been the one to sustain the fatal injuries, according to Menendez’ ruling. Lewis testified Carte died from head trauma.
Menendez also noted blood and brain matter were found on the passenger side of the truck, and the vehicle sustained extensive damage to the passenger side, as well as a crushed roof and missing rear driver’s side tire.
The judge added a witness saw West driving, with Carte in the passenger seat, as they left Eagle Beach that evening. West testified at the grand jury he and Carte switched seats shortly thereafter.
West remains in custody on $500,000 bail.
• Contact reporter Emily Russo Miller at 523-2263 or at emily.miller@juneauempire.com.





Comments (9)
Add comment2nd degree murder?
I dont get it. A 2nd degree murder charge, a BAC of only .071. This doesn't add up. Negligent homicide maybe. He did engage in conduct that resulted in a mans death ( if he was driving). But a 2nd degree murder charge sounds a bit overreaching on Browers part. Is it because West claimed he wasn't driving irking Brower to trump up the charge hoping for a lesser plea?
Yes, 2nd degree murder!
It is defined under AK statute as including:
The "person knowingly engages in conduct that results in the death of another person under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life."
Driving over 75mph in a 40mph zone around a curve despite clear warning signs would qualify, in my humble opinion. Why should that charge be reserved only for cases of severe intoxication? If anything, someone sober should know better.
Woah buddy!
Orion, the trial hasn't even happened yet. Settle down and just wait for the rest of the facts to emerge. Part of the problem is people who are so quick to jump to judgement!
“A grand jury proceeding is not intended to be a mini-trial in which the state presents _all_ evidence necessary to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," Menendez wrote.
why wait for a 2nd death to happen
so why wait for a 2nd death to happen Juneau...Ryan is not taking accountability for his poor choices not once but twice with a result of taking a young man's life this time. When is he going to stop blaming others for his poor choices and regardless of 1 or 2 beers as he puts it, this does not make it okay for getting behind the wheel anyway.
What Ryan has done to this young man's life by ending it so quickly is not okay! Because he had 1 or 2 beers.....what a joke if that is the best justification Ryan has and no remorse i hope he gets the max jail time.
What if this happen to your child, your father, your friend…… what would you want done?
2nd incident
This is not the first time he's hurt someone either. There was the incident by the airport with the gal that was drug by his truck. Now Gabe's son is growing up without a father. At least his son has lots of family/friends supporting him but still...so sad!
Was it very necessary to
Was it very necessary to paint a picture for everyone? I believe the majority of us are aware as to what side of the vehicle my little brother was ejected from. Not a pleasant article to read.
Don't they all say "I only
Don't they all say "I only had 2 drinks?"
It's obvious who was
It's obvious who was driving...are you kidding me?
"painting a picture" for his loved ones to see was pretty heartless. Gabe was somebody's brother,son,friend,cousin,grandson,& my great nephews daddy. His smile is still fresh in our hearts. So please choose your words wisely, think before you speak, & have some compassion. This could have easily been anyone's child. There will be no winners here, but Ryan need to face the music, and pay the price. My heart breaks for both families. With the summer upon us, ill ask the big guy upstairs to keep our children safe...
Well Ryan shouldn't have been
Well Ryan shouldn't have been drinking at all since he was on probation, but i do think the charge is a little much. I think manslaughter or negligent manslaughter is more realistic. Ryan is a good friend of mine and i also knew Gabe since he was just a little guy that lived down the street from me, and no matter how long Ryan gets in jail it's not going to bring Gabe back to us. I know ryan regrets what happened and if he could he would switch places with Gabe. I will continue to pray for both of the family's.