• Overcast, light rain
  • 55°
    Overcast, light rain
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Juneau seeks to annex land already sought by Petersburg

Posted: May 17, 2012 - 12:08am
A map showing the area the City and Borough of Juneau has requested to annex. The current borough boundaries are shown in green, and the area sought in red. Petersburg is seeking some of the same property Juneau is as that city prepares to form its own borough. the matter is now before the Local Boundary Commission, which is seeking comment on the matter through June 28. (Image courtesy of the City and Borough of Juneau)  City and Borough of Juneau
City and Borough of Juneau
A map showing the area the City and Borough of Juneau has requested to annex. The current borough boundaries are shown in green, and the area sought in red. Petersburg is seeking some of the same property Juneau is as that city prepares to form its own borough. the matter is now before the Local Boundary Commission, which is seeking comment on the matter through June 28. (Image courtesy of the City and Borough of Juneau)

Juneau has filed to annex 1,977 square miles of territory south of the borough, challenging a similar request from the new Petersburg Borough. Of that, 447 square miles is water.

Juneau’s annexation proposal seeks to add the watersheds of the Tracy and Endicott Arms, Dawes Glacier and Windham and Hobart Bays and Port Houghton to Juneau.

Some of that area, such as Hobart Bay, where Juneau’s Goldbelt Native corporation owns substantial holdings, is among the areas sought by Petersburg.

Petersburg last year began its own annexation effort, filing with the state’s Local Boundary Commission to take everything between the city and the southern boundary of the City and Borough into its new borough.

That set off concerns among Juneau leaders, who had long eyed much of that area as a future part of Juneau.

Earlier this year the LBC staff sided largely with Petersburg, though it did acknowledge Juneau had a stronger claim to Tracy Arm than did Petersburg.

Juneau and fellow Petersburg neighbors Kupreanof and Kake objected to the LBC staff recommendation as well.

The LBC will take public comments on Juneau’s annexation request until June 29. They may be made in writing or by email to LBC@alaska.gov

• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (5)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
lvmykyk
1805
Points
lvmykyk 05/17/12 - 10:38 am
2
2

There it is

The reason Petersburg didn't want to be tied to Juneau voting district. Fear of annexation and taxation.

villagevelveeta
326
Points
villagevelveeta 05/17/12 - 03:22 pm
0
1

Goldbelt Land is Juneau Land

3000 Juneau shareholders and their families cannot be wrong.
Hobart Bay is owned by Goldbelt shareholders.

alaskanguy
43
Points
alaskanguy 05/17/12 - 06:24 pm
1
0

Petersburg and Hobart Bay

Petersburg fishermen (and women) have hunted and fished this area for years. Juneau has been virtually absent in this area - until now. All that is driving Juneau is a claim for future government control. If this area was so tied to Juneau for years (as the government in Juneau now claims) why were they waiting until now to try to grab the land? Petersburg has much lower levels of government control, regulation and taxation than Juneau has. I would hope that Goldbelt shareholders think this over when considering what is their best interests. I think Juneau just looks at this potential land grab as another opportunity to squeeze more revenue out of the Goldbelt Native Corporation.

Lodestar
132
Points
Lodestar 05/18/12 - 06:11 am
1
0

Its a land grab by both

Its a land grab by both sides. Petersburg doesn't live there either, but somebody does, somebody who doesn't want their voice to be swallowed up by that of either city. Too bad the LBC are the states shoe horn men and the "choice" is one sided. Sure there will be an election, but then the petition will come back again and again until it passes forever. It's like saying do you want oatmeal or pancakes for breakfast and once you choose oatmeal that's all you get to have forever. Government never goes away, it's never undone. It only has to sneak in the door once and then it's the house guest that will never leave.

Sync
468
Points
Sync 05/18/12 - 07:12 am
0
1

Why eye that area for a

Why eye that area for a future part of Juneau? Especially when CB&J still enforce a 3% "temporary" sales tax, and still cannot provide sewer to part of Juneau ...

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING