A Juneau judge acquitted an unhappy McDonald’s customer accused of criminal mischief Tuesday, finding the state failed to introduce enough evidence to support the charge it levied.
Prosecutors said 19-year-old Tyler John Leatham angrily pushed over and damaged a trash can receptacle in the lobby of the fast food restaurant after he didn’t receive the correct amount of change back for his meal.
Leatham was charged with fourth-degree criminal mischief for intentionally causing damage to property in an amount of $50 or more, but less than $500.
Assistant Attorney General Chris Peloso said the receptacle cost about $940 to replace.
Peloso presented eye witness testimony to the six jurors that were selected early Tuesday morning, as well as a profanity-laced recorded phone interview where Leatham admits to police he became frustrated and overturned the trash can.
The owner of the McDonald’s franchise, William Laliberte, also testified, saying the trash can was damaged to an extent where it had to be replaced in order to maintain required company standards. Laliberte said in his sworn statement he did not obtain an estimate of the damage since he knew it would have to be replaced.
An invoice for the $940 replacement cost was submitted to the court.
But defense attorney Kevin Higgins argued the critical element for valuation under criminal mischief statutes is the amount of damage caused by the defendant, not simply the value of the damaged property.
The amount of damage has to be established through evidence showing either diminution in value or cost of repair, Higgins said.
“Diminution in value is measured by determining the difference between the pre-damage value of the property and the post-damage value of the property,” Higgins wrote in his motion to acquit which he submitted to the court after the state rested its case. “The cost of repair is also an acceptable method of valuing property damage.... Replacement cost is an unacceptable measure of the amount of damage.”
Juneau District Court Judge Keith Levy agreed and concluded the state did not present enough evidence regarding the amount of damage actually caused during the Dec. 20 incident.
“It’s sort of like if you had a 1978 Plymouth that got damaged and the cost to replace it — I think we would know that that would far exceed the current value,” Levy said. “Here, there’s no evidence from which I think a reasonable juror could figure out what the current value of the trash receptacle was before and after the alleged damage.”
“I don’t believe a reasonable juror could conclude that the amount of the damage here exceeded $50,” Levy added.
Leatham and the jury were excused before 1 p.m. and the charge was dropped.
Outside the courtroom, Leatham told the Empire it wasn’t even his money that was in question. Leatham said he and his friend were going through the drive-thru for breakfast around 7 a.m. that morning, and his friend accidently handed the cashier an extra $10 that he thought was a $1 bill.
His friend went inside the restaurant to talk to management, but to no avail. After waiting inside the car for 15 minutes, Leatham said he went inside to see what was going on.
One of the managers told Leatham she was going to call the police, which Leatham said made him frustrated. He pushed the trash can over on the way out of the door, a fact which Higgins told the judge he conceded.
One of the managers wrote down Leatham’s license plate number before he drove away, and she called police.
Leatham was later charged with fourth-degree criminal mischief, a class ‘A’ misdemeanor that can carry up to one year in jail.
• Contact reporter Emily Russo Miller at 523-2263 or at emily.miller@juneauempire.com.




Comments (45)
Add commentima49er...
Proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation are optional in life, period. You can usually tell quite a bit about someone based on how they use them though. Just like manners, but in written form.
Actually I do pay attention
Actually I do pay attention to spelling and grammar and feel it is important, but I am usually juggling 20 things while doing this, often from an iphone, no not while driving. If the point gets across, then fine. As for the email/blog/comment section, I think you can set it to email you articles but I am not sure. Ang blog is easier, shorter and more fun to say than comment section
Grammar and spelling is
Grammar and spelling are optional in the actual Juneau Empire, so why not on the "blog?"
Geeze
God do you guy's actually listen to yourselves? It sounds like a high school literature class in here...Not on topic, pointing out everyone's mistakes for attention and validation...Pretty weak sauce if you ask me...
Thanks
for participating, AKJAMIN, way to stay above the fray.
AKJAMIN,You're really one to
AKJAMIN,
You're really one to talk. Did anybody ever tell you that you don't use an apostrophe to express plural? In case you are unaware, it is used to express possession. Did you finish high school?
Yes Downtownie,
but you can't always judge a book by its cover, can you.
I don't think basic language, is what the confusion is limited to.
Ha
Thank you all for proving my original point! Lemmings.
And back to the subject...
It seems appropriate that Mr. Leatham would, since he's so embarrassed by his immature behavior, would offer some sort of restitution for the damaged trash can.
$940? If they actually cost that much, and he actually destroyed the one he damaged, then yes. Maybe reimburse them $930 to settle for the $10 short change. And apologize to the business.
He gets off cheap. No criminal record and a (mostly) clear conscience. And a lesson to grow up and act like a man instead of a petulant child.
This is what an adult would do. How about it, Tyler?
Why didn't they just give him back the nine bucks?
How would doing THAT have been any worse than having this happen?
Lmao
One who knows the condition of the garbage can in the first place. No he shouldn't have pushed it but how aggressive was he was it a small shove or all put aggressive shove.? And what happened to cameras over the tills. I worked as a customer service rep for a long time and best way to deal with it is look over surveillance and count the register . I no many times I told customers fill the paper out and we will call you and that sufficed them. But McDonalds I won't say a race or prejudice thing but half the employees speak lil to no English and just ordering a soda they get your order wrong. Hopefully it's a learning lesson for all involved.
The charge for the trash can was inappropriate
Come on now...this sounds like an old landlord of mine. He buys a telephone for 2.50 at a garage sale and bills me 70.00 when I leave cause he can't find the phone at check out (he removed the phone at my request which I replaced with my own (better) phone. He just "forgot" he took the old used thing outta the apartment years ago.....and figured his as his 'replacement' I should pay for a nice up-grade. Weak!
So this is how it should be caculated:
- Original price
-Years in service
-Depreciation formula
Sorry there Mr. Business owner...you tried to pull a fast one and make a profit on your silly trash can to teach this young man a lesson. Pretty slimy of you. And...has anyone checked? Did the business owner actually buy a new trash can or just plan to pocket the cash?
kpawsuh
http://www.9news.com/rss/story.aspx?storyid=270241
I particularly like paragraph 3.
Yes, it matters.
I've been to McD's before
I can understand why he got so frustrated. Maybe he shouldn't have taken it out on the garbage can, but at least he didn't slap the cashier ;-) Customer service is really not about customers anymore, and employees know that and treat customers accordingly. Mob mentality, know a days, says hang him for slapping a garbage can..all a bunch of ridiculousness! Maybe McD's, having the friendly service they do, should get better garbage cans?