• Few clouds
  • 46°
    Few clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

The 'NOs' resoundingly have it - Measure 2 fails

Coastal management proposal supporters acknowledge defeat

Posted: August 28, 2012 - 11:15pm
Back | Next
Barbara Lobdell ducks into a voting booth at the Douglas Public Library for the state primary election on Tuesday.  Michael Penn / Juneau Empire
Michael Penn / Juneau Empire
Barbara Lobdell ducks into a voting booth at the Douglas Public Library for the state primary election on Tuesday.

Ballot Measure 2, which has been a political lightning rod in Juneau and Southeast Alaska this year, has been overwhelmingly defeated by voters, partial election results indicated Tuesday night.

As of press time, unofficial returns showed Measure 2, which would have re-created a coastal management program for Alaska, trailing badly at just 37.7 percent support, with 61.2 percent of precincts reporting statewide.

Supporters of the measure argued that the coastal management proposal was needed to give Native communities and others residing along Alaska’s coastline, the longest of any state, influence over offshore activity.

“I kept emphasizing that people should vote yes if they want a voice in the management of their own coast,” reported Terzah Tippin Poe, the Anchorage-based co-chairwoman of the pro-Measure 2 Alaska Sea Party, on the phone with Sea Party headquarters in downtown Juneau after polls closed at 8 p.m. Tuesday evening.

Measure 2 detractors generally argued that the ballot measure was vague and poorly defined, warning that it would add unnecessary and harmful bureaucracy, though many also suggested that the Legislature act to recreate a more faithful incarnation of the program that expired last year.

Although votes on ballot measures in Alaska are officially nonpartisan, many of Measure 2’s most visible backers during the campaign season, including Juneau’s mayor and Sea Party chairman Bruce Botelho, former Gov. Tony Knowles, and House Minority Leader Beth Kerttula of Juneau, are Democrats.

Kerttula and Sen. Dennis Egan, Juneau’s two Democratic members of its legislative delegation, both endorsed Measure 2.

Rep. Cathy Muñoz, the one Republican representing Juneau in the Alaska State Legislature, publicly opposed it.

Muñoz joined Juneau Economic Development Council board chairman and former Environmental Conservation Commissioner Kurt Fredriksson, as well as the Juneau Chamber of Commerce, the Anchorage Assembly and a number of industry groups, in urging voters to reject the measure.

“I think the citizens basically read the initiative,” said Fredriksson, who co-chaired the “Vote No on 2” campaign, by phone from Anchorage Tuesday night. “I think they heard both sides, and took the time to read the initiative, and came to the conclusion that this wasn’t really restoring the coastal management program.”

As returns came in showing Measure 2 well behind, several people at the Sea Party office in Juneau blamed the “mismatch” in financial resources between the measure’s backers and its opponents, who were running television ads against Measure 2 in the weeks leading up to Primary Day.

Botelho said he hopes the Legislature acts next year to enact a coastal management program, though he acknowledged the election results signaled “a rejection of our particular approach.”

“We are, of course, disappointed in the outcome. I think it’s important, though, to note that not only do we have the folks that voted for our initiative, but … many of our opponents argued that we needed a coastal management program,” Botelho said. “We stand ready to work with our opponents to find a viable coastal management program for Alaska.”

Fredriksson said he thinks the Legislature will take up the issue in its next session, and that he will be working to see “good features” from his time in Alaskan coastal management brought up for consideration.

“I think with the defeat of Ballot Measure 2, I think it puts it right back in the legislative court. I think that’s where the state policy needs to be debated and acted upon,” Fredriksson said. “Even as I spoke out against the measure, I always pointed out, you know, that I wanted to work with folks like Beth Kerttula and others.”

Meanwhile, the outcome of Ballot Measure 1, to increase the maximum property tax exemption that local governments can offer from $20,000 to $50,000, was too close to call as of press time, with 50.7 percent of voters registering “yes” votes for the measure, according to unofficial returns. That measure attracted little local attention in Juneau.

And in federal primary races, Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, the state’s sole representative to the United States House of Representatives, easily won his party’s nomination for what would be his 21st term in the House, batting aside two little-known primary challengers.

Democrats and Libertarians had a somewhat more competitive primary contest for Young’s seat, with state Rep. Sharon Cissna and small business owner Matt Moore, both Anchorage Democrats, appearing to be the leading candidates in a field of five Democrats and one Libertarian.

But despite Moore’s spending edge in the lead-up to the primary, Cissna appeared to have won a decisive victory. As of press time, unofficial returns showed her capturing 43.8 percent of the vote, with the remainder split between Moore and the other four candidates.

In Juneau’s legislative elections, both Kerttula and Muñoz were unopposed in their party’s primaries. Neither face a candidate in the Nov. 6 general election.

Egan’s seat will be up for election in 2014.

• Contact reporter Mark D. Miller at 523-2279 or at mark.d.miller@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (72)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Latitude58
14399
Points
Latitude58 08/29/12 - 06:47 am
8
19

The serfs...

...fail in their uprising (this time).

kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 08/29/12 - 07:07 am
20
9

OK, now try putting the

OK, now try putting the original CZMP back and see if they approve that. No back room deals, No greeny, stop everything measures, no sell out to the corporations - A nice, modest, middle of the road plan.

fmast50
2087
Points
fmast50 08/30/12 - 08:41 pm
26
14

Botelho, a failed Mayor

Ok, get your thumbs down ready, lat. Botelho's second run at mayor has been such an overwhelming failure. It is bookended by one (near catastrophic) failure in his attempt to get a new Capitol building built which nearly resulted in getting the Capitol moved from Juneau. Then there was this last mess, which also shows how completely out of touch he and the rest of the greenies in Juneau are with the rest of the state.

He will leave office after soaking virtually all of the cbj's reserves, tremendously increasing the cbj's debt, lowering our bond rating and stagnating Juneau's economy.

Thank goodness for term limits.

glacierdogs
1328
Points
glacierdogs 08/29/12 - 07:28 am
13
13

Weak Effort, Predictable Outcome

Latitude, voters have spoken quite loudly this time. I'm sorry to say that this effort had a predictable outcome (see earlier comments), and it makes adopting a coastal management program more difficult. Moreover, it makes having the program jobs located in Juneau almost impossible given how weak this Sea Party effort was and the mood of Alaska voters as revealed in the primary election. Alaska is moving quickly toward the conservative side, and a poorly designed and weakly led effort like this Measure 2 effort does not help Juneau whatsoever! A 2-to-1 defeat like this one indicates a waste of time and money.

Specifically, the Sea Party should have talked with miners, farmers and others before drafting the measure. They should have adopted House Bill 106 of the 2011/2012 Legislature, and any departure from that bill needed to be for a good reason. The effort to have voters accept the measure should have focused on the Railbelt because that is where the voters are. The Sea Party should have not associated itself with those legislators who now appear likely to lose in November.

Like spoiled children, these aging Baby Boomers and remittance people will now say to the Legislature and Governor, "We acted badly but still, you promised to give us a coastal management program even if you won so pay up." I won't say these Sea Party people have been stupid but many will say that. There has never been a world that works the way the Sea Party evidently thinks this one does. I think the odds will forever be against them.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 07:28 am
14
23

fmast50,

that's Botelho's second run as mayor? Second? You need to go back to elementary school to learn your arithmetic, pal.

Your whole post is cluttered nonsense. You wanna try again? Better yet, just delete it before too many people see it and comment on it. I'm trying to save you the embarrassment here.

akjim
3003
Points
akjim 08/29/12 - 07:33 am
14
18

Had they simply presented the

Had they simply presented the original plan it likely would have been overwhelmingly passed. First the Dems block its passage in the Senate, now enviro-wackos have wasted many more months presenting a plan that was clearly flawed, and worse than no plan at all. Perhaps during the next session things can get back on track.

glacierdogs
1328
Points
glacierdogs 08/29/12 - 07:35 am
14
20

fmast50

Fmast, you did forget to mention the disaster of the borough boundary dispute with Petersburg. Those Norwegians beat CBJ to the punch and out-negotiated us to boot. When our elected and appointed municipal leaders are outsmarted by Norwegians I think they should take a pay cut.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 07:34 am
14
21

glacierdogs,

The people of Alaska voted how they saw it. Not based on the understanding of the legislation. Look at the propaganda spread by the No on 2 party. It's obvious how an outcome like this can occur. The money and the sound bites were overwhelmingly on the opposing side. It's sad that so many Alaskans took their words at face value (see earlier comments).

The majority of Alaskan voters don't care about a coastal management program. They care about seeing what they imagine to be more revenue in the state's pockets... this is hardly the truth, however. The majority of Alaskan voters located in the railbelt have no interest in the lives of coastal residents and the arguments (lies) used by the no on 2 party struck a chord with these people. They don't care about others, certainly not enough to get this issue understood.

Maybe some day the legislature will do what the voters of Alaska can't be trusted with. Doubtful though.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 07:36 am
13
15
akjim
3003
Points
akjim 08/29/12 - 07:38 am
13
13

@poof

You seem to have a short memory, or at least a blinded one. Politics as usual, blame the Republicans for everything.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 07:38 am
12
20

akjim,

"now enviro-wackos have wasted many more months presenting a plan that was clearly flawed, and worse than no plan at all. Perhaps during the next session things can get back on track."

This is truly a dimwitted comment. First, you have not one example of the plan being flawed, other than it didn't pass. Second, worse than no plan at all? Again, you have no examples of this eing the case. You just listen to the soundbites, then swallow. Don't forget to chew, you might choke...

fmast50
2087
Points
fmast50 08/29/12 - 07:43 am
19
10

Poof?

Your knowledge of history is a little cheesy. Botelho has been mayor twice. Keep your mouth shut when you are ignorant to the facts.

snagger
8248
Points
snagger 08/29/12 - 07:50 am
14
9

Just the Start!!!

I can't wait for November!!!

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 07:54 am
7
15

jim, by all means, refresh my memory.

How did the senate democrats unanimously block passage of the house passed HB 106?

AH HA
1639
Points
AH HA 08/29/12 - 07:55 am
15
8

Well Bruce;

It wasn't quite as ugly and distasteful as the new capitol building you dreamed up and tried to foist off on the taxpayers but it was right up there.

skirkz
6684
Points
skirkz 08/29/12 - 07:58 am
16
4

Ahh! Wednesday!

So! How about that record 1.28" of rain! Sun is out in Douglas right now! NICE!

AH HA
1639
Points
AH HA 08/29/12 - 07:58 am
14
6

Cheeesypoof

Proof read before foaming at the mouth. It keeps you from sounding like a boob.......

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:00 am
8
13

fmast50,

"Your knowledge of history is a little cheesy. Botelho has been mayor twice. Keep your mouth shut when you are ignorant to the facts."

Genius, he's in his third consecutive term now, which makes his fourth term, as he was elected mayor back in the 90s.

Shut your mouth.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:02 am
4
12

AH HA,

"Proof read before foaming at the mouth. It keeps you from sounding like a boob......."

so, for example?

AH HA
1639
Points
AH HA 08/29/12 - 08:05 am
10
3

@kpawsuh

Decent Idea. I would have voted for it if that's what it had done.

AKjustice
6075
Points
AKjustice 08/29/12 - 08:07 am
17
7

Losers!!!

Why did JE put a picture of the losers on the front page?

Figures...

AH HA
1639
Points
AH HA 08/29/12 - 08:09 am
12
6

Cheesy....

Here's a quickie;

"examples of this eing the case"

While you are at it, have a look at your use of grammar and sentence structure.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:14 am
7
17

AH Ha,

seriously? Why don't you go back and proofread all my posts for me, then report back to me all the grammatical errors. I really care a lot about minor grammatical errors on my internet forum posts. It's really important to me. I don't want to look like a douchebag going around making minor grammar errors so intelligent people like yourself have to point them out. Hope leaving the b out of "being" didn't complicate my post too much for your brilliant mind to fumble over...

Got any other biggies?

snagger
8248
Points
snagger 08/29/12 - 08:16 am
15
6

AH HA

If it isn't rocket science---Cheesy gets confused!!!

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:16 am
8
15

quite a collection of commentors on here this morning

Between AH HA, the grammar police, and fmast50 who doesn't know who his mayor is, I can tell we are getting a well-rounded discussion going here.

Reminds me of the opposition party...

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:19 am
4
16

snagger,

well, obviously counting the number of terms your mayor has is borderline rocket science. I can tell the opposition group "no on 2" had their ducks lined up... struggling to keep track of their representatives' term history. Sheesh, it's no wonder prop 2 failed.

snagger
8248
Points
snagger 08/29/12 - 08:24 am
9
8

A Little Victory--

Celebration ! Is all we've got going this morning.

sefisher
690
Points
sefisher 08/29/12 - 08:35 am
12
12

The people of Alaska voted?

The people of Alaska voted? The majority of Alaskans have spoken??
Really,what was the turn out this time 10, 20%

I think the turn out was really low and that the majority of Alaskans will be stunned.

Milspec.
2481
Points
Milspec. 08/29/12 - 08:36 am
13
6

The mayor served his first

The mayor served his first term from 1988 to 1991, most people do not know that. I believe Fmast50 was referring to his second run this time around when he was re-elected in October 2009.

Regardless the people have spoken.
Good job.

cheeesypoof
1895
Points
cheeesypoof 08/29/12 - 08:42 am
11
17

milspec,

you can stick up for one of your own, but doesn't matter. Botelho is in his third consecutive term, right now. This added to his term in 1988 makes 4 terms.

To make it better, fmast50 concluded his ignorant post with suggesting I shut my ignorant mouth. My ignorant mouth being the correct one... You can stick up for his/her ignorance, but I've seen your posts in the past, and I know you're just sticking up for your own.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376823/
Juneau Birds

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING