• Overcast
  • 55°
    Overcast
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Airport manager hails passage of ballot propositions 1 and 2

Terminal, SREF getting funds from sales tax, bond issue

Posted: October 11, 2012 - 12:00am

At the Juneau International Airport’s board of directors’ regular meeting Wednesday evening, Airport Manager Jeannie Johnson said she had not expected Proposition 1, which passed narrowly in last Tuesday’s municipal election, to succeed.

The proposition authorizes a $25 million general obligation bond issue to pay for a list of city projects.

“Well, much to my surprise, this community approved that bond, and we’re all delighted about it, but I didn’t spend a whole lot of staff time planning,” Johnson told the board.

One of the largest single items on the bond funding list is the airport terminal, which will receive $6.9 million to help pay for its renovation.

Johnson deferred to Airport Architect Catherine Fritz to explain what that $6.9 million will be used to do for the terminal.

“We will use the $6.9 million to essentially replace the 1957 portions (and) get our essential services, such as water and sewer, to a part of the building that is incredibly deficient right now,” Fritz said. “The restaurants area for water and sewer is not only limited in where they have it, but the capacity of the sewer lines, for example, are just small and not functioning well.”

That section constructed in 1957, according to Fritz, is the two-story piece of the building that includes the airport manager’s office, the Federal Aviation Administration office and the Alaska Seaplanes counter.

“Structurally, the building has been built in chunks, and you can’t tear down part of it without some really serious cost impacts of patching it back together to make it structurally workable for today’s codes,” Fritz explained. “So the logical thing is to take out the whole piece that is affected. So logically, the ’57 piece will go as a whole.”

The $6.9 million will not cover the entire cost of the renovation, Fritz cautioned.

“It’s $28 million to do everything else that we need to have done, in today’s dollars,” said Fritz. “So any time you’re in a renovation, you’re going to do the best you can with what you’ve got.”

Both of the ballot propositions that voters approved this month include funding for the airport.

The five-year extension of the 1 percent special sales tax that passed, by a wider margin, as Proposition 2 will provide $3.1 million in matching funds to go toward the airport’s planned Snow Removal Equipment Facility.

In addition to storing and maintaining the equipment and machinery used to clear snow at the airport, the SREF will also contain about 2,800 square feet of administrative space, including three offices, a break room, archive space, a training room and a work room.

Some of the office space that will be displaced in the airport terminal renovation will be moved to the SREF, according to Fritz.

Board member Joe Heueisen, who was appointed in late August, questioned how the $6.9 million number for the terminal renovation was reached.

Johnson said that originally, $28 million was requested for the airport, but the request was eventually pared back to $10 million. Of that money, it was determined that $3.1 million was needed for the SREF match, and the airport terminal renovation would receive the balance of the funding.

The City and Borough of Juneau Assembly Finance Committee ultimately decided to put the SREF match into Proposition 2, which was considered likelier to pass, while placing the airport terminal project on the bond funding list.

“We got our $10 million, but we got it in two pieces,” Johnson concluded.

Johnson said she and Fritz will meet with Finance Director Bob Bartholomew next Monday to discuss exactly when the airport will receive the funds for both projects.

• Contact reporter Mark D. Miller at 523-2279 or at mark.d.miller@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (13)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Latitude58
14491
Points
Latitude58 10/11/12 - 05:42 am
8
2

Is there no end to this?

The $6.9 million will not cover the entire cost of the renovation, Fritz cautioned. “It’s $28 million to do everything else that we need to have done, in today’s dollars”

Enough is enough. This is a small-town airport, not La Guardia. How about you bring in another airline before you even breathe one more word about additional money for facilities?

The propositions that passed didn't pass due to the airport. They passed due to other things people wanted, and the airport went along for a free ride.

futomake
306
Points
futomake 10/11/12 - 06:19 am
3
9

Well, maybe we should just

Well, maybe we should just let it fall down around our ears, Lat. And guess what? The other part of the terminal that will need renovation dates back to 1948. Maybe we should just bulldoze that, per your line of thinking.

I don't think it's unreasonable to rehabilitate 55-year old infrastructure. One of the secondary benefits of that will be making the airport more attractive to potential service providers.

The ride isn't totally free, as you would have everyone believe. The airport is providing matching funds for the SREF project.

kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 10/11/12 - 07:08 am
10
4

It really dawned on me this

It really dawned on me this time. I always wondered how these taxes kept getting passed. No one I talked to wanted them, yet they always pass by a large margin. Then it hit me. Who votes? Seniors. Who dont pay sales tax? Seniors...

Ak_Mom
1043
Points
Ak_Mom 10/11/12 - 07:56 am
2
0

fut:

"One of the secondary benefits of that will be making the airport more attractive to potential service providers."

Your kidding right? AK Air & the greedy higher ups will never let another Airline be in there they make too much money off of us!

And ya let it fall I would be ok with a cheap Ketchikan or Sitka style airport if we only have one airline anyhow. What are we making it fancy for? I only need to get on the plane and off the plane.

KP: I totally agree !!!

swimmergirl
4368
Points
swimmergirl 10/11/12 - 08:14 am
1
0

AKmom and Lat -

I've said it before - I'll say it again.

It's not AK Air keeping competition out of Juneau. It's the fact that when competition does arrive - no one flies them!
It happened with Delta, happened with MarkAir. I was a travel agent then, and saw it first hand. People have to be willing to actually fly on the competition in order for another airline to have a chance.

ken dunker II
3341
Points
ken dunker II 10/11/12 - 08:59 am
0
0

If I remember right...

State workers could not transfer their air mileage benefits over to Delta.

barnardj1
661
Points
barnardj1 10/11/12 - 09:40 am
2
1

The airport is a huge make

The airport has been a huge make work project from the start and that won't end for many years. Look at the huge piles of sand they are moving around for no good reason. They are adding 15000 sf for offices. No wonder the government is bankrupt.

conner
530
Points
conner 11/05/12 - 09:00 am
2
0

How about allowing for some

How about allowing for some multi-use in the area at times.

Salmon Guy
86
Points
Salmon Guy 10/11/12 - 11:31 am
1
0

Infrastructure is expensive...

and there is no way to get around it. Projects only get more expensive each year. Wait until the Fed's handy work hits home in the form of inflation; it's going to be insane soon.

Either way, it's always less expensive to build now, rather than waiting. That's one reason the insane permitting processes in force today are so damaging to the cost of a project. If you have to spend almost a decade in the EIS process, you will see a 50% increase in cost, minimum!

If they built the road 10 years ago, it never would cost $350-450 million now and we'd have access like the rest of the west coast.

And barnard, do some research will you!? All that sand movement is phase two of the RSA project. Phase 1 dredged the float plane pond and phase 2 is building out the rest of the project.

al97ct
465
Points
al97ct 10/11/12 - 12:17 pm
0
2

SalmonguyActually I am

Salmonguy
Actually I am breathing a sigh of relief because we have a permitting process. Often when one is not in place all the additional reclamation costs are tossed right on the backs of the public.

Also consider the fact that many people live in Juneau, do so, because access is NOT just like the rest of the west coast. And remember even if the road was built yesterday or today, in the end, people still have to use a ferry to get to Haines or Skagway. A huge point pro-road people seem to keep leaveing out.

Salmon Guy
86
Points
Salmon Guy 10/11/12 - 01:04 pm
2
0

@ al97ct

Reasonable permits and today's permits are not the same thing. Local regulators purposefully hold projects hostage, acting as desk activities to stop or significantly hamper the process. If the normal person in Juneau wants to know why projects take so long and cost so much, the first place blame should be cast is on the activists sitting behind the desk at all of the federal agencies in this town.

Having a ferry terminal that will take people to Haines is only logical. Continuing the road to Skagway will be the next phase after the ferry terminal. Look at Washington State and all of the ferry terminals it has. You drive to a ferry terminal, hop on the short run ferry that makes a straight shot to the island, and then hop off. Ferry runs should be as short as possible. That’s how the rest of the developed world does it. For some reason, the “Highly Educated” vocal minority in Juneau think that a half empty, 40 year old ferry running where a road could go is the answer.

Ak_Mom
1043
Points
Ak_Mom 10/11/12 - 02:29 pm
1
0

Swimmergirls...

When was the last time another airline came here? Times have changed and budgets have gotten smaller. With medical travel 8+ times a year I can say I would travel with whoever had the best rates. Now that might be AK Air but as long as there is no competition to stop them they have no loyalty to the customers that kept them here when there was and they over charge us now because we have no choice but to spend 3 days on a ferry or pay their fees.

happytobesingle
217
Points
happytobesingle 10/12/12 - 10:23 am
0
0

we need another airline

I think the people that work at the Airport managers office are the most unfriendly people you can meet very cold people

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING