Police were called to Bartlett Regional Hospital at 7 p.m. Saturday after two men with stab wounds showed up for treatment.
Officers say a 45-year-old Juneau man claimed he was awakened after being stabbed in the arm by his friend, “who accused him of theft,” a Juneau Police Department release said.
After a struggle for the knife, the 49-year-old Juneau man who allegedly attacked the 45-year-old man received cuts to the face. The men said the incident took place in the 300 block of Fourth Street in downtown Juneau. Alcohol was involved and police are investigating the incident.




Comments (64)
Add comment@Elva
I do see what you are talking about, but I just think that since you have not observed the behavior being discussed you do not know what the rest of us are talking about.
How do you explain one man stabbing another man? Just misunderstood?
The homeless are humans, and shouldn't be treated as otherwise. There are good people and bad people (both by nature or illness) that are homeless and/or drunk.
I disagree that anyone should have to be social with an intoxicated individual on any given street. If they wanted that they would walk into a bar. That is not for you to decide other people's comfort zones; and not anyone's to decide yours. I am only suggesting that we keep it off the streets, and not take away the choice to avoid drunken violence.
The individuals that are out of control and/or are aggressive about cigarettes and money should not just be placated because they have had a rough go at it.
The bit in my post about them asking for your dog, was just because I did not want to assume that you had cigarettes or money to attract them; and was a silly example, sorry.
You are right, grendel
Meth users are not a responsible bunch.
I'm curious to know why you single out 'legal' meth users? Illegal meth users are irresponsible too. The difference being that they're also trying to support a $500/day habit, and bring along a whole cadre of cookers, dealers, traffickers, and other assorted gangsters to our communities.
I don't want to go back to prohibition. That obviously did more harm than good. But the almost unrestricted availability of high-octane alcohol in close proximity to the alcohol addict crowd does everyone a disservice.
Sometimes I am right
there are no legal meth users; that was English 2nd conditional clause (I learned that in ESL course). No one supports a $500/day habit -- they dig their hole a little deeper each day, until caught, or disposed of by assorted gangsters.
So are you proposing moving the bottle or the drunk? These places operate legally, or they would not have liquor license and CBJ permit. “put the screws to” a lawful business?
I don’t have all the facts like you must. Perhaps these hooligans are stockpiling and purchase only when sober? That’s legal. Or perhaps they have proxy buyers that are sober and of legal age?
How about CBJ puts these cretins on a “do not sell to” list after they have been cited for an alcohol-related disturbance/violation? If establishment sells to them, then they MAY lose their license to operate (it is state license, but CBJ may protest), and in the interim they have fresh headaches for selling to known drunks.
I propose...
...whatever works.
I think CBJ has the authority to restrict alcohol sales in certain areas. So move the business.
Putting the Glory Hole and other support services in the heart of our downtown doesn't seem to make sense. But who would want them?
I like your idea of a 'drunk license', though I'm not sure if that can stand up to a court challenge.
Sitting around with our thumbs firmly planted doesn't seem to be a rational approach, for drunks OR meth heads. Neither situation is improving.
Careful with whatever works
...or you get backed into a corner with my 20 yr mandatory sentencing guidelines for distributors. That would work on whatever ails society.
It only works...
If we can afford it.
gentrification of down town
some times when a drunk downtown asks for money i give them a twenty dollar bill...I gave chief a hundred dollar bill; just to keep in the sync of things a few years back...i heard he is still alive and he lives low income housing somewhere..
meth
the knife fighters were on meth, so the knife thing made perfect sense after days and days of tweeking...
It wasn't downtown downtown, it was in a building.
Read the address, please. There was a trail of blood down the stairs of a locked building.
Three paragraphs and the discussion goes to downtown downtown "homeless" drunk stuff, Nowlin?
I heard that one downtown felony assault got or is about to get 10 yrs (closely related to the Glory Hole) and that felony assault was in a different building downtown and that he had previously and proudly shown his record from California.
Knife fights, any fights, are dangerous.
Signing out after this and not even going to the pellet gun rifle article because guns should not be in any school. Rules are rules.
Thank you JPD Metro. Most people don't care about the splattered blood of the victims, or the effort of the uniforms. I could write a whole tribute to the adrenaline necessary for constant enforcement and the need for peace. I tell jokes to balance my adrenaline, blood is no joke.
-< -< -<
-< -< -<
Move the G Hole
I think Point Retreat would be a good option. But in the meantime, totally ignore the bums.
@Grendel & Chicken Little
@Grendel: You bring up a good point about not selling to those who abuse alcohol. In other states they reissue you a license/ID with a red stripe across it and establishments do in fact get in trouble if they serve you.
@ChickenLittle: It does not bother me that you disagree with me, but I do not understand most of your post. The article does not say they were in a building; I see no mention of bloody stairs or locked buildings; what is your tangent about pellet guns, and guns at school. I agree that the JPD should be thanked, even though they are often put down in the comments; however, they were called to the hospital on this one, so why do you talk about them dealing with blood? I am truly trying to understand what you are talking about.
@Paul
I have seen the same thing here in Juneau with an AK-issued ID. Not sure if that's pushed from the state down or upon recommendation from the community-level up.
The fact is that if someone
The fact is that if someone came along and cleaned up downtown like Rudy Giuliani did to Times Square, then Juneauites would be complaining that downtown is now DISNEYFIED and not a 'real' local destination. Most likely, people just like to b itch and moan.
i grew.up in a town
You would never see someone drunk in town it was not allowed.
i grew.up in a town
You would never see someone drunk in town it was not allowed.
i grew.up in a town
You would never see someone drunk in town it was not allowed.
@JuneauGrrrrl & Grendel
@Grrrl: I am sure that you are correct that the complaining would not stop if downtown was cleaned up (or ever for that matter); however, I do not think that is a good enough argument to not try and do something about it. Not saying that you are using it as an argument to not try. Downtown is already not really that authentic, the Red Dog was not in the same place in the olden days, and the fronts have been changed a bit. I am not sure how that all ties into the social problems downtown, but I do agree that caution must be taken when trying to do anything major to a city.
@Grendel: That is good, you are saying it is already in place, right?
bakatcha Paul
I'm saying I was @ Freddies and the cashier in liquor store would not sell to a gent he carded because there was something on his AK ID that prohibited the sale, and it was not his age.
Paul and Grendel
If you are court ordered to not be in possession of alcohol, and not be in a place that sells or serves, your ID/Drivers license has a red bar in the left center, instead of a blue one. It's the blue line with white lettering "DRIVERS LICENSE". If you card someone, who has the red line, you're not supposed to sell to them. I understand from TAP class that Anchorage has a city ordinance that everybody buying alcohol must be carded, regardless of age. Juneau does not have this requirement.
@dartbucks
Thank you for the information. On the last sentence, I thought it was a federal regulation to card everyone; did you learn that Juneau does not in your TAP class?
One hopes
It's not a federal reg. Although it's not a bad idea. I think Fairbanks does the same sort of thing but you know, it's plain that both anchorage and fairbanks have more than their share of drunks wandering around so the question to ask is does it do any good?
@ Paul
Not federal or even state law that you have to card someone. But as far as someone under 21, if you get stung selling to a minor, the fine will make you a believer in checking IDs.
@AH HA & dartbucks
Thank you. Well even if it is not helping keep drunks off the street, carding everyone sounds like a reasonable idea. I could see how in the small villages that could be a hassle since they do not have a DMV; but in Juneau I do not see why it shouldn't be enacted. The only bad thing I can think of is the inconvenience for individuals who forgot their ID that day.
@Paul
I am not certain it really works all that well, but it might and I cannot see how it would hurt, other than a significant increase in workload at DMV that translates directly into increased costs. I suppose the added cost can be offset by increased alcohol tax but I really don't like the idea since it's not really a user tax since the people who do drink responsibly get to support the program as well.
Something else to think about is, what happens if I decide to provide a passport instead of an AK DL? Or a Military id? To really make it work it is going to get a little more complex than we would think at first glance.
A tale of two cities!
What the drunk wants is not your cigarette or spare change in reality. He wants a miracle cure and a roof. He wants desparately to be invisible while sick and get the day's booze need soothed. Think about it~! What is $2 going to do for anyone other than another bottle of way too crappy tasting and over powered beer. If you want to help, give these people a sandwich, a coat, anything but not little bits of money. Giving money makes you an enabler. You know what it's going for yet for the ease of getting this bum out of your face...75cents! The downtown area is not unlike almost every city in America. In that when the clock strikes 4:30, the dynamics totally reverse from the secretaries and their bosses, to the street people. The main reason the area has not gone through a huge change is not unlike the change that Seattle went through after the Kingdome was built. Before, Pioneer square was "drunk n hooker central". The influx of the mass suburbanites for football games made the city clamp down and what occurred is a not too bad place to walk around now. If the cruise lines demanded better ambiance and had a reason, the dynamics would change, I guarrantee it. Look at the $$$ spent on a stupid boardwalk instead of needed "DOWNTOWN" renewal. But as long as alcohol is available and the innkeepers are more greedy than community oriented, it won't change and most of you will not do anything but not go or start demanding the police presence gets larger to the city fathers. The place will remain the almost slum it is, until those that are in control have a $$$ reason to make a change or fear losing the next election. Sadly the people that have the power don't go there at night either. All of your above stated reasons relate and for most it's just too big a job. Everyone wants change, nobody wants to be the guy who tidies up. It won't happen until the drunken guy stabbing or who gets stabbed is one of their own. Peace!
A tale of two cities!
What the drunk wants is not your cigarette or spare change in reality. He wants a miracle cure and a roof. He wants desparately to be invisible while sick and get the day's booze need soothed. Think about it~! What is $2 going to do for anyone other than another bottle of way too crappy tasting and over powered beer. If you want to help, give these people a sandwich, a coat, anything but not little bits of money. Giving money makes you an enabler. You know what it's going for yet for the ease of getting this bum out of your face...75cents! The downtown area is not unlike almost every city in America. In that when the clock strikes 4:30, the dynamics totally reverse from the secretaries and their bosses, to the street people. The main reason the area has not gone through a huge change is not unlike the change that Seattle went through after the Kingdome was built. Before, Pioneer square was "drunk n hooker central". The influx of the mass suburbanites for football games made the city clamp down and what occurred is a not too bad place to walk around now. If the cruise lines demanded better ambiance and had a reason, the dynamics would change, I guarrantee it. Look at the $$$ spent on a stupid boardwalk instead of needed "DOWNTOWN" renewal. But as long as alcohol is available and the innkeepers are more greedy than community oriented, it won't change and most of you will not do anything but not go or start demanding the police presence gets larger to the city fathers. The place will remain the almost slum it is, until those that are in control have a $$$ reason to make a change or fear losing the next election. Sadly the people that have the power don't go there at night either. All of your above stated reasons relate and for most it's just too big a job. Everyone wants change, nobody wants to be the guy who tidies up. It won't happen until the drunken guy stabbing or who gets stabbed is one of their own. Peace!
@AH HA
Those are some good points, and while I do not drink personally, I am against charging people who do so responsibly. Also, good thinking about the passports, military and other forms of ID; that would be over the head of CBJ.
@skatdachef
Good post. I am with you, I do not have problems sharing food; it is the dollars that, as you say, are only going to enable the problem that I disagree with. That is why I think we need to have the Alaska Constitution amended to allow the prohibition of panhandling. If people are hungry, we as a community can get together and feed them. We should not be legally allowed to fund their habits.
The money that is funding the new boardwalk is being paid for solely by the cruise industry, not us; however, it can be used for anything that betters cruise ship tourism (since it is their money), and I think that it could have been redirected to handle this problem. Not positive but it seems like it could have.
I agree that it is not an easy path, to say the least, but I am adamant about trying to come up with a solution.
to Paul
I'm not sure prohibition of panhandling is worth an amendment to the state constitution - in any state. That sounds like a local issue, even if it may pop-up in every locality. We have city ordinances regarding bear-proofed trashcans, but I dont think that should rise to the level of bear-proofing the state.
@Grendel
I see what you are saying. However, it is against the Alaska Constitution to prohibit panhandling; sorry for not being clear about my suggestion. That would have to change for the CBJ to have the option.