The City and Borough of Juneau Assembly spent much of Saturday in the Assembly Chambers, working with city staff and discussing amongst themselves how the Assembly should approach issues facing the city in the coming year.
The portion of the retreat dealing with goals and action items, something that the Assembly sets after the election every year to map out the city’s short- and long-term policy direction, was facilitated by Scott Miller, public policy and planning consultant with the McDowell Group.
Miller told assemblymembers that his role at the retreat was mainly to “direct traffic.”
“My goals are to help you be creative, to help you reach clarity and to help you reach consensus,” Miller said.
As the assemblymembers prepared to go over the five overall goals set by the 2011-12 Assembly one year ago, starting with, “Preserve and improve local quality of life,” Assemblymember Randy Wanamaker made clear he did not think much of how they were written.
“That’s a nice aspirational thing to say. Nobody’s opposed to improving quality of life,” Wanamaker said of the first old goal. “We all have different views about what that means.”
Wanamaker argued, “We need to get going on … meaningful action we can take that will help solve some of the socioeconomic ills of our community.”
Assemblymember Karen Crane said she had written down a few of her top priorities for the retreat and she thought others had as well.
“It might be helpful if we heard what some of those things were,” Crane suggested.
Miller eventually assented to that approach.
“I’m kind of in favor of let’s get into the nitty-gritty of it,” Miller said.
Wanamaker, going first, immediately named housing as a priority, a subject quickly seconded by many other Assemblymembers.
“Convene the Committee of the Whole in a workshop session and listen to what needs to be done by the City and Borough of Juneau from the financial institutions, the builders of the community and the major property owners of the community, find out what needs to be done so that they can provide housing,” Wanamaker suggested, saying it would be a “learning opportunity” for the Assembly.
Assemblymember Johan Dybdahl said the Assembly should promote Juneau’s economic growth.
Assemblymember Carlton Smith highlighted an action item from the previous Assembly: “Develop CBJ financial transition plan for the potential future decline of state and federal assistance.” He also said Juneau should work toward building the capacity of its electrical grid, an issue that came up at the Southeast Conference annual meeting he attended in Craig last month (http://bit.ly/TN0vqD).
Crane mentioned a transportation plan and commitment to another old action item, “Support new state, library, archives, and museum (SLAM),” as her priorities, alongside housing.
“Start addressing the inebriate problem,” Mayor Merrill Sanford offered, simply, as his priority.
Deputy Mayor Mary Becker said she wants to see the Alaska State Capitol complex expanded and argued that Juneau needs to promote itself as a regional and state leader in order to keep its capital city status.
“We have to be good neighbors,” said Becker. “And it’s not just Southeast (Alaska), in a way. We have to show the state, too, that we’re down here working for the whole state as the capital.”
Assemblymember Loren Jones brought up two of the old action items regarding solid waste and sewage disposal, as well as civic participation and voter turnout.
“If we can get 50 percent of our registered voters to vote instead of 30, we’d have a better idea of whether we’re on the right track or not,” Jones contended.
Assemblymember Jerry Nankervis identified increasing Juneau’s water supply as an issue he wants to pursue.
Assemblymember Jesse Kiehl said Juneau should continue to push for a return to the defined-benefit system for state employees, which Becker echoed, during the upcoming legislative session.
After the priorities were outlined, Miller led the Assemblymembers through them again, starting with housing.
“Having just been on the Assembly two years, this is an area that’s real frustrating for me,” Crane said. “And I started out on the Affordable Housing Committee, and someone would say, ‘Well, let’s do such-and-such,’ and another person would say, ‘Well, we already did that. It didn’t work.’ And I’ve heard that a lot when it comes to affordable housing.”
Nankervis said he feels the key players on housing should be “doing something rather than just talking about it.”
As each assemblymember offered his or her thoughts, Miller wrote down a generalized list of the suggestions on a large pad of paper. He said at the end of the work session that he would type everything up and send copies to the assemblymembers and city staff.
The discussion on how to grow the economy drew a wide array of suggestions.
“The idea is if you’re going to increase the economy and you only have a certain amount of expertise or staff time, do you look at one area to the exclusion of another?” Jones asked. “Do you try to do it all?”
Sanford responded that he expects each assemblymember to be committed to helping attract businesses of all sizes.
“We need to be paying attention to every single job, every single job in our community and our region especially,” Sanford declared.
Jones suggested that the city’s economic plan, which assemblymembers agreed should be coordinated with CBJ staff and the Juneau Economic Development Council, should look closely at how to make the best use of limited resources.
“It just seems to be that there’s a lot of opportunity out there,” said Jones. “How do we focus that opportunity a little bit?”
The topic of financial transition, and preparing for the possibility of some future decline in state revenue, was perhaps the thorniest at the day-long retreat.
Smith spoke about the possibility of partnering independent consultants with city administrators to “do a comprehensive review of all CBJ operations, look for those efficiencies, create opportunities that may be there for consolidation and identify where we can preserve.”
“We want to be able to do more with less, because we’re going to have less, from the state and from the feds,” Smith said.
That remark drew a reaction from City Manager Kim Kiefer, who participated in the discussion along with Deputy City Manager Rob Steedle and City Attorney John Hartle.
Kiefer said the CBJ’s current organization is “not sustainable,” citing the deep cuts to staffing and new employee training since the height of the economic downturn nearly four years ago.
“I have to say something about doing more with less,” Kiefer said. “We’ve been doing something more with less since 2009, and we can’t do any more with what we have now. We have got to do less with what we have and do it well instead of doing a bunch of bad things. … We started in 2009 thinking that we were in this for two years or so, and we made reductions then, and they’re not sustainable now.”
After Kiefer’s response, Smith said he did not disagree with what she said, but still favors a review.
“This is the appropriate time for us to take a look at ourselves,” said Smith. “That’s all.”
Jones, a former internal auditor for the state, warned his fellow Assemblymembers that audits do not always come back with answers that policymakers like.
“I would caution us that if we’re going to do that, we be prepared to deal with the consequences,” said Jones.
Discussing what will happen to the city in a worst-case economic situation is not constructive, Crane contended.
“I think it’s a waste of time to plan for doomsday,” Crane said. She added, “We put ourselves in the best position possible by being as reasonable as we can now and not living outside of our means.”
Discussion on the transportation plan mentioned by Crane, the inebriate problem Sanford brought up, the capital issue identified by Becker, solid waste management noted by Jones, and the cost of energy Smith cited was relatively limited. That brevity was least partly due to limited time, as Miller worked to keep the discussion moving along and the time creeped closer to 4 p.m.
“This might be a good time for me to admit abject failure on getting through this agenda,” said Miller to laughter, as it became clear that there would not be enough time to get through everything Saturday.
Sanford said after the retreat that he expects the Assemblymembers will have to continue the discussion at a later date.
“Scott’s going to get us a little report back … and then we’ll be able to look at those key items there … and see whether or not we have to ask Scott to come back and help us a little bit more, or if we can work on them ourselves through staff,” Sanford said. “And I think we got to some of the bigger issues, so I think we’ll be able to go through staff, but we’ll see.”
Both Sanford and Kiefer said they found the work session to be helpful.
“I think it’s always really good when we all get together and look at where we want to go,” said Kiefer. “I have to have a clear understanding of where the Assembly wants to go so I can do everything I can to assist them to meet their goals.”
Some concrete ideas offered at the retreat are likely to receive action. Sanford mentioned Wanamaker’s suggestion of a housing “workshop” as an example, saying it could happen within the next few months.
Assemblymembers were also briefed by staff at the retreat as to what is going on with various departments and agencies.
As Finance Director Bob Bartholomew presented an overview of the city’s finances, Sanford, one of only three members of the Assembly this year with more than one term of experience (http://bit.ly/PbMru8), emphasized the Assembly’s obligation to draft and approve a budget, in consultation with staff.
“It’s important for us, as the policymakers, to stay involved with this and pay attention,” Sanford said.
That responsibility was reiterated by Engineering Director Rorie Watt, discussing the recent passage of two ballot propositions that will provide city projects with well over $50 million in funding (http://bit.ly/UROgik).
“The good news is, their projects got funded,” said Watt. “The bad news is, they can’t all go on day one.”
Watt told the assemblymembers, “There will be some decisions that you have to make, and suffice it to say, you’re probably not going to be able to make everyone happy with their first choice on when they get their money, and some projects will have to wait a little bit.”
Other staff members who were present at the retreat and addressed the assemblymembers included City Clerk Laurie Sica, Community Development Director Hal Hart, Human Resources and Risk Management Director Mila Cosgrove, Public Works Director Kirk Duncan, Airport Manager Jeannie Johnson and Port Engineer Gary Gillette.
• Contact reporter Mark D. Miller at 523-2279 or at mark.d.miller@juneauempire.com.





Comments (18)
Add commentJesse bless his heart
Return to an unstable, unsustainable pension system for public employees where the unfunded liability is growing regardless of how much the Legislature appropriates... as Juneau's number one priority for the Assembly? Come on Jesse, get out of the Senator's office and out of Downtown. Really there are more pressing needs in Juneau than convincing Governor Parnell and the legislature the need to return to a DOB pension.
More with less
How about 'different with the same'? That's the job of the Assembly, to tell the staff which things to de-emphasize, so they can focus on the other stuff.
Just a question bjfleutsch
Didn't Senator Egan introduce legislation to return to defined benefits?
And Mr. Kiehl as Egan's employee was paid to carry that legislation.
So don't be too hard on Mr. Kiehl he is just doing his job and promoting the legislation he is paid to get passed. Shouldn't blame Mr. Kiehl for doing what he is paid to do.
Concerned
He was elected to deal with CBJ issues, like the ones the other Assembly members mentioned: water system, waste system, transportation, harbors, airport, hospital, drunks, parks, swimming pools, ice rinks, libraries, where the whale goes, borough boundaries, Eaglecrest, police, fire, capital move, growing the local economy, opening the AJ, permitting a Herbert Glacier mine, what our sister city of Whitehorse is doing and probably dozens of other things, but state employee pension plan is not one of them. Given your line of thinking, the next thing he will be bring up is oil taxes.
CBJ needs to work on making
CBJ needs to work on making information easier for the public to get at.
For example yesterday it was frustrating trying to find out if there was a burn ban in place. This should be on CBJs home page. And last night it was difficult getting information about the earthquake. It made me realize Juneau is not prepared for emergencies.
Housing:
Empty homes and empty apartments have been sitting on the market for months. Not everyone can afford to buy a home; I don’t see this as a “government” problem.
If CBJ works to flood the market with housing this will hurt everyone. CBJ needs to allow the free market system to sort out housing to a large degree.
Now it is harder for people with poor credit to get loans and this is a good thing. Making housing ownership easy and affordable for just anyone is what caused our economy to crash.
CBJ can help with housing by getting quality workmanship out of contractors and better layouts for new neighborhoods. The practice of clear cutting lots and replacing good soil with low quality topsoil should end. The subdivision going in on the right towards the Glacier is a good example of a poorly designed neighborhood.
They ripped everything green out replaced all the good with sand, gravel and rocks. This is cost effective for builders but not so great for home buyers.
CBJ needs to focus on finding ways to keep the quality of life in tack for residents in Juneau because it seems to be degrading to a large degree. Air pollution from wood smoke seems to be unchecked, noise pollution has gone unchecked and these things make a big difference in our daily lives.
comments
1. @jumpstart: The link is here, where it's always been: http://www.juneau.org/lands/woodsmoke.php
2. @jumpstart: Agree on private sector with housing. But why doesn't that same logic apply to topsoil? If buyers don't like the soil, they can buy another house.
3. @bfluetsch: How is the capital move an Assembly issue? CBJ doesn't 'own' the capital any more than it decides on the state pension program. Though both issues have a large impact on the economy of Juneau and the lives of many Juneau citizens.
4. @bfluetsch: Didn't Kiehl soundly defeat you for his Assembly seat? Sounds like sour grapes coming from you.
Lat, let me count the ways
Capital move:
1. CBJ appropriates a significant sum to the Alaska Committee to fund many programs to make Juneau a better Capital city, by making life easier for legislators and staff.
2. CBJ sales tax revenue is greatly bolstered by the fact the Alaska Capitol is in Juneau. Loss of said revenue would greatly impact the CBJ budget.
3. CBJ Property tax is greatly bolstered by population of well compensated citizens. (state employees)
4. Bartlett benefits by having a well insured potential pool of clients.
5. Airport benefits because of all the state employee travel to and fro.
There are many other ways that the Capitol of Alaska being in Juneau is a high priority for the CBJ Assembly.
Lastly, yes Jesse won but there are no sour grapes on my part. State pension policy in not a concern of the CBJ Assembly. However huge, unfunded pension obligation of the CBJ to CBJ staff and local teachers is. I understand former Mayor Botelho finally admitted that it is a real problem, but he expects the state to pick up the tab. Hate to be a local taxpayer if he is wrong!
Jumpstart: But we do have a web-page. 'Recycle' opportunities
and such, as I recall.
Lat: visited your recommended website. Goosebumps.
Lat: I would respectfully disagree on the "own" the Capitol.
We do. Considering how Juneau, and the region, is economically dependent on this salient fact Juneau, being the seat of government, has an intrinsic obligation to remain so.
Hi Lat. - I believe it hurts
Hi Lat. - I believe it hurts us all to a degree (property values etc..) when developers clear-cut and replace existing good soil with fill material. The integrity of our land is lost for one thing when you rip stuff out and replace it with fill. On a hill side this is what leads to landslides and on level ground it leads to flooding.
You know Assembly....
Juneau is the only community that the Assembly meetings are not broadcast live on public access TV. For all the cash CBJ Taxpayers give KTOO one would think they would do it pro bono. Nevertheless, the time has come for live and on demand broadcast of Assembly, School Board, Planning Commission an all other committee and commission meetings. Time for the CBJ to join the 21st century of accountability.
Wow. What's Wanamakers
Wow. What's Wanamakers problem?? I want to see an all out effort to "Preserve and improve local quality of life" here.
al97ct,
Don't take things out of context, he refered to all of them. He might be the best grounded person on the Assembly. As for bringing business to Juneau, first you need to identify a need (or create one) then the customer must have the needed resources to purchase said need, you know of one? Housing, government usually screws that one up more that it helps. Getting an enterprise up and running must first get past permitting and then the gauntlet of naysayers that always appear! Look at the road issue? Nope, why not? Cause it's gonna hurt something, mostly someones feelings.
al97ct: "Preserve and improve local quality of life" in Juneau.
This is a very broad statement and the first listed in the Assembly's 2011-12 five overall goals.
Kick it to the curb.
The statement alone is a preamble. You may be surprised how my vision may be diametrically opposed to your own.
Appropriate retreat topics for discussion and planning
I believe that Carlton Smith should be thanked for highlighting the need to examine and plan for reductions in federal and state revenues and jobs in Juneau. While that may be a waste of Ms. Crane's time, it is an absolute reality. I believe it is better to spend time discussing the impacts of these reductions than a discussion of the SLAM, especially in light of the City Manager's remarks.
Appropriate topics for discussion and planning
I believe that Carlton Smith should be thanked for highlighting the need to examine and plan for reductions in federal and state revenues and jobs in Juneau. While that may be a waste of Ms. Crane's time, it is an absolute reality. I believe it is better to spend time discussing the impacts of these reductions than a discussion of the SLAM, especially in light of the City Manager's remarks.
Appropriate topics for discussion and planning
I believe that Carlton Smith should be thanked for highlighting the need to examine and plan for reductions in federal and state revenues and jobs in Juneau. While that may be a waste of Ms. Crane's time, it is an absolute reality. I believe it is better to spend time discussing the impacts of these reductions than a discussion of the SLAM, especially in light of the City Manager's remarks.