An Alaska state senator is proposing a bounty on sea otters, the cute little marine mammals often seen by tourists swimming on their backs between cruise ships, sometimes munching on a fresh crab or clams.
Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, sees the furry-faced critters as a growing threat to shellfish beds, particularly in southeast Alaska, where he is from. On Wednesday, he introduced legislation that would have the state pay $100 for each sea otter lawfully killed under the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act.
"We're not talking eradication. We're talking slowing the population growth," he said. "In my opinion, we're not going to get any help from the federal government."
Even if the bill were to pass, it would be unenforceable under the federal law, said Bruce Woods, a spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. States cannot enforce laws or regulations related to the taking of any marine mammal under the law unless the Interior secretary transfers conservation and management authority to that state. That hasn't happened.
Stedman said part of what he is trying to do is begin a discussion on the issue and send a message to the feds that something needs to be done. "Clearly, it's a problem," he said, "and it's going to get worse."
There are three sea otter populations in Alaska, in southwest, south-central and southeast Alaska, whose numbers total an estimated 98,000. The number for the southwest population, listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, is the largest, at 55,000, but the latest estimate is more than 10 years old and the population is thought to be in decline, Woods said. Population estimates for the other regions are from 2010-2011. Both those populations are growing, he said.
Since their reintroduction to southeast Alaska by the state in the 1960s, after being virtually wiped out during the fur trade era, the number of sea otters in that region has grown to about 25,000, Woods said. The Marine Mammal Protection Act transferred management authority to Fish and Wildlife in 1972.
Under the federal law, only Alaska Natives can hunt sea otters in Alaska; there is no hunting season and no bag limit, but there are prohibitions on wasteful take — that is, killing sea otters for the sake of killing them, Woods said. At least 840 sea otters were taken for subsistence reasons last year, the highest since 1993, and not surprising given the growing size of the population, wildlife biologist Verena Gill with Fish and Wildlife said.
Fisherman Ladd Norheim of the southeast Alaska community of Petersburg said the sea otters are "decimating" Dungeness crab stocks and would like to see some kind of management. He said half the area he used to fish for Dungeness in southeast Alaska is gone. Three years ago, he said there were 21 Dungeness boats over by Kake. Last year, he said there were two, and one left.
"What strikes me funny: I'm fishing crab right now, and if a crab stock gets low or something or ... any fishery, they shut us off or close us down to protect a crab or a fish. Yet when a sea otter comes in and absolutely decimates an area, they don't do anything about it," he said Thursday. "They just say, 'Oh, they're warm and fuzzy and cute.' Well, I'm pretty warm and fuzzy and cute, too, but I don't totally wipe anything out.
"I mean, crab have rights. Clams have rights. Where do sea otters come out being so holy?" he said.
Woods said he understands the frustrations.
"But our management has to be driven by science," he said. And questions remain about where the population is in terms of its establishment and carrying capacity, and what exact impacts it is having on prey species, like crabs or clams, he said. The agency is working with the University of Alaska Fairbanks to study those issues.





Comments (15)
Add commentI would be opposed to this
I would be opposed to this, I don't believe that Stedman talks for everyone he represents. I am wondering if he even consulted with the communities that he represents? Was there any Government to Government consultations? With the Tribes in the areas that are to be represented?
What needs to be done is for US Fish & Wildlife Law Enforcement needs to come to the table too many times they have used the heavy hand, not to say that those who have gotten in trouble deserve it or been 'entrapped' many of those who got into trouble were not following the law per say.
The crab fishing has been overfished areas near Kuiu, Alaska Fish & Game has no mangement plans for in season.
Maybe something needs to be
Maybe something needs to be done but legislators that are using no science should keep do doing what they do best, making statements and bickering at the Capitol building. Pushing laws through and WASTING our time is pointless when they have much more demanding things to discuss, not to mention that enacting laws that are not lawful as a statement only comes across as stupid and childish.
Stop wasting the time you have on grandstanding and pointless debates. Let the scientists and people already in charge of handeling wildlife do their jobs and you do yours.
Sounds like
somebody from Kake needs to move to Metlakatla and leave the rest of the crab for Alaskans and da otters.
Pretty sure lots of hunters in Kake would not be opposed to this bill as it would buy alot of beer at the Kake community store.
Photo album...
I knew several trollers who always use to take pictures of sea lions. Doesn't anyone take pictures of otters?
Stedman out of touch
with his constituents on this one.
complete legislative foolishness
as another legislature tries to circumvent federal reulations.
And all the while the 90 day clock keeps on ticking.
Stedman just set a bounty...
...on our tourism industry. Stupid stunts like his are the kind of thing that reaches headlines in the Lower-48, accompanied by adorable pictures of baby sea otters riding on mama's tummy. Alaskans again come off as a bunch of hillbillies who want to destroy nature for their own greed.
We haven't even recovered our reputation from foisting Sarah Palin on the rest of the country...and now this!
Maybe otters need to be controlled, maybe they don't. I want to see a broad scientific consensus on this one (as will the Feds) before we start any kind of control program. A few crab fishermen and politicians shouldn't own the conversation.
I'm so pleased that Parnell doesn't have unrestricted control over this subject...he'd already have State-funded helicopters out there snuffing out otters and anything else that might compete with anyone out to make a buck.
Sea otters
I have a shack on Admiralty. In May, we get lots of dungeness. Once commercial season starts, if we get a couple a day, we're doing great. Am I supposed to care whether my crab have gone to otters or commercial guys? I'm left in the same predicament - no crab. I am not opposed to addressing the expanding sea otter population in SE, but not just so commercial guys (or women) can get more crab. We need to protect recreational crab areas from both commercial crabbers and sea otters.
My, My,
My crab, my cabin, my,my,my. Hey where is the cabin, I want go kick in the door and have a party in my national monument.
"science driven management"
This is not a problem for science. It is a question of values. Scientists already know that otters are eating tons of crabs. UAF students are studying this right now and confirming what fishermen have been saying- otters eat tons of crab (duh.)
The question is, do we like our cute, cuddly animals, or our tasty pinchy ones?
Bruce Woods is saying we don't know what the carrying capacity is for otters in the area... well, yeah, so far the otters have just been expanding and expanding their territory, there is nothing to limit them yet. Also his statement about using science to decide this issue implies that there is some "natural" balance that we should strive for.
It is impossible to know the ratio of otters vs. invertebrates that existed before the fur trade killed off the otters and allowed the crabs etc to flourish. Even if you could use science to find that out, it is completely a values-based decision to manage for that scenario. You would be saying that you value a "natural" state of apparent equillibrium.
Anyway my point is this is not a problem that science can solve. It is a human values issue.
Haha
These critters are for real people. They take no prisoners. They eat to live.......eat eat eat!...they average about 25 pounds a day of whatever they choose to eat in their path.
What is a dungy...about 2 pounds? Do the math and multiply that by a 100 or 200 otters all looking cute and fuzzy - that's how roll.
They are very efficient at cleaning out (killing) everything in their way just by their appetite.
The time when a raft or two of otters come into Auke Bay looking for and find food, you all will be praising Senator Stedman or wishing you listened.
This idea needs to be
This idea needs to be considered. As a sport fisherman who has fished the outside waters of SE as well as the inside waters for most of my life, there is an obvious increase in the number of otters. At the same time, Dungeness have all but disappeared from at least the outer coast and are in decline in the inside waters, including Glacier Bay. Commercial fisherman might have something to do with this but as otters need up to about 15 pounds of food a day, they obviously have some influence on the abundancy of crab, urchins, clams, etc. The other issue is that otters mate at all times of the year, thus increasing the population of otters that will continue to wipe out seafood that is not only sought by sport fisherman, but which are of high value to commercial crabbers, etc. Otters have perhaps one predator, killer whales, which is obviously insignificant considering their population growth. Also, they do not add to the economy as greatly as those species on which they feast.
Proposed Bounty?
Sea Otters eat a wide variety of foods such as sea urchins, fish, clams, mussels, limpets....and not just crab. Man hunted these animals for their fur and almost nearly wiped them out for about 170 years. Through preservation and conservation efforts, the population is progressing but not enough as they are still considered endangered. As you all know, in 1989 the Exxon Valdez oil spill killed thousands and its still harming them today.....along with the crab. Sewage runoff and pollution from cruise ships are a problem too, they are very harmful for all sea life around the world. So we shouldn't single out one species to justify the clam decline. Now we have a senator who announces a proposed bounty? Why not propose a ban on fishing crab for a year or two? Instead of paying to have an innocent animal killed for $100, why not pay this money towards those who crab fish for a living. Or pay to have the clam population studied and find ways to repopulate it. Its a win-win situation. Both man, sea otter and crab get to live, have families and enjoy their precious lives in Alaska.
my
My my. Dont kick my door in, it swings out & is left unlocked. Just in case anyine might need it in time of distress