• Broken clouds
  • 39°
    Broken clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Judge denies John Marvin's motion for new trial

Convicted murderer still slated to be sentenced in April

Posted: February 26, 2013 - 9:56pm  |  Updated: February 27, 2013 - 1:02am
John N. Marvin Jr. in Juneau Superior Court in October 2012 for the shooting death of Sgt. Anthony Wallace, 32, and Officer Matthew Tokuoka, 39, of the Hoonah Police Department in August, 2010.  Michael Penn / Juneau Empire
Michael Penn / Juneau Empire
John N. Marvin Jr. in Juneau Superior Court in October 2012 for the shooting death of Sgt. Anthony Wallace, 32, and Officer Matthew Tokuoka, 39, of the Hoonah Police Department in August, 2010.

A judge has denied a motion to grant the man convicted of murdering two Hoonah police officers a new trial on one of the jury’s factual findings that exacerbates his sentence.

Sitka Superior Court Judge David George issued a ruling Thursday denying the motion from John Nick Marvin Jr.’s attorney Assistant Public Defender Eric Hedland.

Hedland argued that the jury should not have made the factual finding that Sgt. Anthony Wallace was engaged in the performance of official police duties when he was killed.

That’s a finding that enhances Marvin’s prospective sentence from a range of 20 to 99 years in prison to a flat sentence of 99 years.

The jury did not make that finding for the second slain policeman, Officer Matthew Tokuoka.

The jury was asked to make those findings in addition to the primary issue of whether Marvin committed first-degree murder. The jury convicted him in November on both counts of first-degree murder for fatally shooting the two officers in August 2010.

The factual findings deal with whether the two officers were uniformed or otherwise clearly identified as police officers when they were shot, and if they were engaged in the performance of official duties.

According to testimony during the trial at the time they were shot, Wallace was on-duty in a police uniform driving a marked police vehicle, whereas Tokuoka was in off-duty, in plainclothes driving a personal vehicle. Wallace was driving back into the center of town with his mother who was doing a ride-along, when he stopped to greet Tokuoka and his family who were taking out the trash in the parking lot at a liquor store. Prosecutors showed Marvin shot them from the second-story window of his nearby house as the two were exchanging pleasantries in the parking lot.

Hedland had argued in his motion it was undisputed at trial that Wallace was socializing with the Tokuoka’s at the time he was shot, and not engaged in official duties. District Attorney David Brower argued in response that an officer, especially a traditional “beat” officer patrolling an area, can be performing official duties without being actively engaged in police work.

“A uniformed police officer on duty walking down the street on a traditional ‘beat’ might stop and talk to a store owner for 10 minutes,” Brower wrote. “Someone might take that opportunity to shoot the officer.”

The judge agreed with Brower, writing in his ruling, “The undisputed evidence was that Officer Wallace was on duty, in uniform and on patrol at the time he was shot. The fact that while on patrol he stopped to exchange pleasantries with a fellow officer does not, in this court’s opinion, change his status as performing official duties. As the state points out, defendant’s argument would limit an officer’s “official duties” to an unspecified, but limited number of patrol functions determined by unknown factors. Defendant’s contention would doom an officer to constantly fading in and out of official duties, even though in uniform and on patrol the entire time. Defendant now urges the court to require a jury to determine an officer’s official status second by second, by each particular interaction or activity in which the officer engages during the course of his patrol.”

George continued on to write that vacating the jury’s finding for Wallace would impose “untenable and impractical” limitations upon police authority and undermines their interaction with the public.

“Is a uniformed officer stopped at a stoplight in his cruiser on official duty since he is not at that moment actively enforcing the law? What is the duty status of a uniformed officer who during the course of foot patrol speaks with a passing city assembly person, a child at a playground or a local merchant on the sidewalk outside his shop? The distinctions urged by defendant defy both reason and common sense, and would reduce the public’s ability to appreciate police authority to no more than divination.”

Marvin is still scheduled to be sentenced in Juneau on April 5. Marvin faces a flat sentence of 99 years for murdering Wallace, and a range from 20 to 99 years for murdering Tokuoka.

• Contact reporter Emily Russo Miller at 523-2263 or at emily.miller@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (10)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Latitude58
14400
Points
Latitude58 02/26/13 - 10:10 pm
18
1

Oh give it UP!

This guy murdered those men with his rifle with no justification. He should be put away for the rest of his life. Now whether he is sane is still an open question in my mind, but regardless, he should never walk the streets as a free man again.

Stop wasting the court's time.

ethicaldilemma
98
Points
ethicaldilemma 02/26/13 - 11:53 pm
7
1

Please!

Clearly Mr Hedland, and possibly Mr Brower as well based on his response, have never heard the term "Community Policing". Yes, I would imagine that is often times tasked "official business". That might include walking around talking to people, business owners, listening to concerns, helping to solve problems and creating relationships of trust.

Good call Judge!

tomas
272
Points
tomas 02/27/13 - 07:00 am
6
3

Really?

The guy is dead. What difference does it make if he was on the job, in or out of uniform, or even if he was a cop or a shopkeeper? He's still dead. Our courts get so bogged down in irrelevant details.

AH HA
1639
Points
AH HA 02/27/13 - 08:56 am
8
6

It's sad,

That we continue to focus in the wrong aspects of this and refuse to discuss the root of this.

John Marvin was mentally ill when he killed those two and had been for more than a year. He was a well known, clear threat to himself and to others in the community and yet the State knowing this did nothing. The Court, knowing this, did nothing, The Police Department, Knowing this, took no active steps to secure the community from him and the community it's self was also largely aware of the situation and they also took no action.

If John Marvin is guilty of Murder (and there is no doubt that he is) then we also need to spend some time in a discussion of our current policy and law regarding mental illness and when a government agency should be taking proactive steps.

kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 02/27/13 - 08:23 am
9
1

He should just be glad he

He should just be glad he isn't in Texas. They'd be warming up the chair...

Copenhaver
297
Points
Copenhaver 02/27/13 - 09:35 am
7
1

What a photo!

A picture is worth a thousand words.

Alaskan30
15
Points
Alaskan30 02/27/13 - 05:29 pm
3
0

If he were in Texas.

If he were in Texas, he woulda been a thing of the past by now...Texas doesn't mess around. Neither should any other state.

ForReal
1238
Points
ForReal 02/27/13 - 08:13 pm
2
0

He is a waste of time, waste

He is a waste of time, waste of money, waste of skin, waste of air...pure waste. Waste him!

ken dunker II
3341
Points
ken dunker II 02/27/13 - 09:21 pm
2
0

AH HA: A very unique perspective. I agree, as you state,

Mr. Marvin is guilty of murder twice over.
I agree with the court's ruling but must admire Mr. Marvin's attorney's due diligence.
AH HA raises a very valid point here, though, in light of our national debate concerning gun violence particularly in relation to the mentally unbalanced.
In fact Hoonah could well be a very good microcosm in the study of how residents, law enforcement and the judiciary play a role in the drama of gun violence.

really
812
Points
really 02/27/13 - 10:52 pm
2
0

Exactly Mr. Dunker! This is

Exactly Mr. Dunker! This is in fact a microcosm of the problem we as a society have with mental illness and gun crimes. Above, we have someone saying the State knew of the history of mental illness and did not do anything about it before others were killed. Fact is, there is little they could have legally done with the laws as they are currently written. In the end, we have two dead officers.

This tragedy, along with just about every other incident that has been in the spot light (Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Sandy Hook etc.) may have had a legitimate chance at being prevented had we had more stringent laws or ways of dealing with those who have a history of violent mental illness.

In each and every mass-casualty incident, we hear again and again about how there were "red flags" displayed by the suspect. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were writing disturbing poems in class about death, seen shooting and detonating bombs on gun ranges. Cho (VT shooter) was buying mass quantities of ammo and mags online and seen practicing disturbing scenarios on the gun range. Both the Aurora shooter and the Sandy Hook shooter were well known to have deep mental health issues with violent tendencies. All were known about by law enforcement and others as violent prior to their rampages but nothing was done about it, including Marvin. This is where we need to change if we want to stop these incidents from happening.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376823/
Juneau Birds

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING