Editor’s note: Content of a sexual nature.
A Juneau judge Thursday denied an appeal for a man convicted of open lewdness for touching himself inappropriately in Walmart, ruling the city’s ordinance is not unconstitutionally vague.
Thomas Collins, the defense attorney for Eugene J. Bourdon, 54, who was convicted of the misdemeanor offense by a jury in November 2011, had argued the city’s ordinance is overly broad and the word “lewd” is not defined.
Juneau Superior Court Judge Louis Menendez wrote in his 10-page ruling that the ordinance “may appear vague on its first read,” but not in its entirety since the language “apprises the ordinary person of how (the parameters by which) his or her behavior will be judged.”
Menendez explained that an element of the ordinance is that a person must know he or she is likely to be observed, and that people viewing the act must be likely to be offended.
“If viewers are not affronted or alarmed, the act was either not lewd, or the act was lewd but done in a place where such behavior was socially acceptable,” Menendez wrote. “ ... In other words, a lewd gesture may not be punishable if made at a private adult party, but the same gesture may be punishable if made in a city park full of families on a Sunday afternoon.”
The judge admits that what constitutes “lewdness” may vary depending “somewhat on evolving social norms,” but found that the trial level court did not err by not instructing the jury on the definition of lewd.
Assistant City Attorney August Petropulos had argued that undefined words in city ordinances are to be defined by common usage, which in this case would be “sexually unchaste or licentious” and “obscene, vulgar.”
Menendez agreed, saying the term is “well within the comprehension of the average juror.”
“His public [filtered word] is not on the fringes of common notions of lewdness — it hits the bull’s eye,” the judge wrote, noting that he agreed the ordinance applies in this case.
A jury convicted Bourdon after a one-day trial in November 2011, and he was sentenced to serve 90 days in jail, the maximum penalty for the class ‘B’ misdemeanor. He appealed the conviction the next month.
The charges stemmed from an incident in July 2007 when a Walmart employee caught Bourdon kneeling down in an aisle with his pants down, masturbating while looking at pictures on his digital camera. The employee watched as Bourdon then got up and stalked two young girls throughout the store, according to charging documents.
A responding Juneau police officer arrived on scene and was instructed by Bourdon’s probation officer at the time to check Bourdon’s items for photos of children. Bourdon was on probation from a 1997 case for four counts of second-degree sexual abuse of a minor.
Police confiscated his camera and cell phone and discovered hundreds of photographs of clothed body parts of young girls and women, as well as two videos on his cell phone showing sexually explicit activity involving a girl between 5 to 8 years old, according to an affidavit.
The district attorney originally charged Bourdon with two counts of possession of child pornography and one count of indecent exposure in the first degree, all felony charges, but all charges were dismissed in August 2011. The city filed its case against Bourdon for open lewdness shortly thereafter.
Court records indicate Bourdon has a criminal history of sexual offenses dating back to 1979, which former District Attorney Richard Svobodny, now the deputy attorney general for the Department of Law’s criminal division, detailed in a sentencing memo in 1993.
Bourdon was convicted of exposing himself to a 5-year-old girl in 1979, Svobodny wrote, and of fourth-degree criminal mischief in 1986 when he was found in the crawl space between the men’s and women’s bathrooms at the Shee Atika Hotel in Sitka.
In another 1986 case, Bourdon was convicted of attempted sexual assault when he grabbed two girls near Sitka’s Blatchley Middle School.
“Defendant lay in wait as these two young girls were walking home,” the sentencing memo read. “Fortunately both girls were able to struggle away.”
Bourdon was convicted of indecent exposure in 1992 after he followed a group of kids, ranging in ages from 9 to 11 years of age, home and started to [filtered word] about 15 feet away from them. Bourdon ran away when he saw the stepfather of one of the girls, Svobodny said. He was convicted again on one count of indecent exposure in 1993.
• Contact reporter Emily Russo Miller at 523-2263 or at emily.miller@juneauempire.com.





Comments (21)
Add commentThis idiot needs to be put
This idiot needs to be put down or locked away for the rest of his life before he hurts, rapes, or kills a little girl, woman, etc. People like him cannot be rehabbed and should not be allowed in society. If the judge lets him out into society and he hurts someone else then the judge should be held accountable too. He is a SICK man and should not be free....
Wrong place ,wrong time...
This guy needs to move to Seattle or San Francisco; he'd fit right in!!
Sick twisted piece of $h!t needs be locked up
This sick, perverted disgusting, sorry excuse for a human being needs to be locked up permanently or castrated. He is not going to change. He's been committing sex crimes since the 70's?!?? Throw away the key!!!!!!
Why drop the other charges?
It seems like being found with child porn on his phone was a slam dunk for a probation violation or three.
I just wish the fathers of
I just wish the fathers of some of these kids had found him before the cops did.
Thank you Judge Menendez
If only you had the ability to lock him up and throw away the key. I would like to know why the serious child related offenses were dropped and the city only pursued the public lewdness? It seems photographs on his person, while on probation, should constitute a dozen more serious charges!
Just imagine...
...being this guy. Having the demons in him that compel him to do that stuff.
I couldn't force myself to commit those actions even if I wanted to. Not because I'm such an upstanding moral citizen that I can resist those dark impulses, but because I simply don't have those impulses at all. And I'm so, so thankful that I don't.
While I'm repulsed by this man's actions and entirely agree that justice must be served and the public must be protected, part of me also has some empathy for him. I don't have any idea how powerful his compulsion is, and who knows? If any of us were afflicted with it, we might be just as powerless to resist it as he appears to be.
Clearly the guy has some sort of illness. Stringing him up on the front page of the newspaper isn't likely to cure it. I hope one day they find a simple diagnosis and cure that they can implement before it comes to this. Maybe he has a gene out of wack, which could be fixed with a simple pill in the future. Better for all involved.
But for now...carry on.
Zero tolerance for pedephiles
People must take responsibility for their behavior. He knows he has a problem. Why should society have to be subjected to his sickness? To defend his actions as to the interpretation of lewd? Lock him up or remove him from ever having access to our children period. He is not the victim here but he makes a strong case for surgical intervention to restrict his actions if he can't be rehabilitated.
I think it would be in this
I think it would be in this man's best interest for him to take his meat and beat it out of town.
I don't have empathy for him at all...
The only "cure" for this "illness" is removing him from society completely. Some people are just broken in the head and need to be eliminated before they are allowed to hurt other people or, God forbid, procreate and pass these sick genes on to another person.
There is no cure. Period.
Empathy?! Would you have empathy if he molested your child?! Who cares about his compulsion. He needs to be away from society. Period. I have no empathy for him. Pedophiles are not worth the air they breath.
New Job
He has a future as a catholic priest.
No I will not imagine being this creep
Just reading this articles send chills down my spine. I will spend my free time thinking about how I can keep my little ones safe, not trying to empathize with a man whose lewd acts have surely scarred others children for life!
*these articles
Had to correct my grammatical error. It seems like there is an increasing number of reports of child abuse that is of sexual nature. Disgusting. They get slaps on the wrist and people are asking we have empathy for them? My goodness, someone steals fuel in this town and people are ready to hang them but by all means, lets feel sorry for the men who violate our children! Seriously?
Only one cure - castration.
I have an excellent pair of sharp hedge trimmers.....problem solved. If I ever see this guy out in public again, I'm going to the shed!
cut his...
hands and his personals off... problem solved.
Well Empire
Have you milked all the hits you can get out of this misery yet?
You know Lat58, I sometimes
You know Lat58, I sometimes agree with your usually non reactionary posts but I have to say that this time I think your way off base. This man has shown a pattern of predatory behavior against young girls going back decades and he is clearly a risk to society.
We all have various attractions and impulses but few of us act on them if they cause so much personal harm to a child or other adult. You only lock a person in prison for a couple of reasons; to protect society from further harm, as a deterrent, to express community condemnation, or to rehabilitate and 90 days accomplishes none of that.
Shrike
Please reread my original post. I'm all for locking this guy away forever. He's a danger to society and there's no fix for him. I never advocated anything different.
I only lamented that I don't believe that anyone would willingly act upon such reprehensible impulses unless he had a severe defect, probably of organic origin. And if that's true, then any of us could be afflicted by such a defect and be similarly helpless to resist it.
To the fine folks talking about hedge shears and such, I simply say, "There but for the grace of..."
Okay, that does explain your
Okay, that does explain your position better but we will have to disagree on the organic origin and inability to control ones behavior. He may have the attractions to a child, and I suspect many who never prey on them have them as well, but I dont believe these so called attractions are uncontrollable anymore than I believe a drunk cant control his drunk driving.
To me that is giving the perpetrator an excuse and I just dont buy that or have any empathy what so ever with those who give in to their predatory behavior.
Yeah, Shrike, I just don't know
Tough to say without walking in someone else's footsteps.
Maybe the guy's just a scumbag predator that gets off on violating and hurting children. And maybe he chooses to act on his compulsions and could control them if he wanted to. Maybe.
I tend to think of people like that in the same vein as Adam Lanza - he was mentally defective, cause unknown, cure/treatment unknown.
I don't know which theory is right.