Katie John ruling wins Native leaders' approval

An Alaska Native group is heralding a U.S. Supreme Court decision to not review a legal case about subsistence fishing and hunting rights.

The high court on Monday declined to hear the state’s petition in the lawsuit State of Alaska v. Sally Jewell, known widely as one of the Katie John cases.

“We are very pleased with the Supreme Court’s wise decision to uphold the rulings of the lower courts,” The Alaska Federation of Natives Co-Chair Tara Sweeney said in a statement. “This is not only a victory for Katie John and her family, for Alaska Natives and other rural Alaskans who depend on subsistence to feed their families, but for all Alaskans who seek a prosperous, fair and equitable society.”

Citing state rights, Gov. Sean Parnell rekindled a long-standing subsistence battle last year by asking the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that gives the federal government control over hunting and fishing on navigable waters on state-owned land that’s adjacent to federal land. The federal rules provide a subsistence priority during times of shortage for rural Alaskans.

The AFN viewed the lawsuit as an assault on subsistence rights.

“The Parnell administration’s lawsuit was an assault upon the people of Alaska who depend upon hunting, fishing and gathering to feed their families,” AFN Co-Chair Ana Hoffman said. “We are very glad that we can put that behind us and work together toward a lasting and fair solution to our state’s subsistence management problem.”

AFN President Julie Kitka said the organization also has the support from the Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack and top Department of Justice Officials representing the federal government, who was also party to the case, and the Native American Rights Fund.

Parnell’s office could not be reached for comment on Monday. He told the Empire earlier this year that he disagreed with former Gov. Tony Knowles’ decision not to pursue the case in 2001.

“This last court just said because of the kind of questionable precedent of the past, we have to make this up as we go; we have to have a case-by-case look. What that means is that for every river, for every stream that touches or crosses federal lands for decades to come, there will be litigation on this issue because there’s been no certainty or clarity in the law from the court,” Parnell said. “I’m not talking about certainty on whether subsistence exists or not. I acknowledge that is a part of our people here. What I’m talking about is legal certainty of what the boundaries are for all parties and as long as there’s an opportunity to fight over those boundaries, there will be division among the races. That is not something I can abide by. That is not something I can live with. In order to get that legal certainty on what the boundaries are for everybody involved we did appeal, and that’s why I took that approach.”

More

Thu, 02/23/2017 - 08:25

Local energy experts to speak to Chamber of Commerce

The Juneau Chamber of Commerce’s luncheon Thursday features representatives from one of the oldest establishments in Juneau, looking both at the past and to the future.

Read more
Thu, 02/23/2017 - 08:24

Roundabout on Riverside? DOT looks for engineer to consider options

The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has begun the process of finding an engineer to suggest ideas for fixing two of Juneau’s busiest road intersections.

Read more
Thu, 02/23/2017 - 08:19

South Franklin Street construction to start next week

The City and Borough of Juneau is beginning the first phase of its Downtown Street Improvements on Feb. 27, CBJ announced Wednesday. The work starts with a new roadway, new sidewalks, new lighting and draining improvements to parts of South Franklin Street.

Read more
Thu, 02/23/2017 - 08:17

This Day in Juneau History: Feb. 23, 1987

On Feb. 23, 1987, Alaska House lawmakers voted 22-17 to transfer all of the $426 million from the Alaska budget reserve to the general fund to cover state bills. However, the clause that would have made the bill effective immediately after it was passed by both the Legislature and Gov. Steve Cowper was not passed, meaning that the bill will not go into effect until 90 days after Cowper’s signature and therefore not in time to stop a state cash flow crisis predicted to occur on March 9.

Read more

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING