ALL ACCESS MEMBERSHIP

JOIN NOW ACTIVATE SIGN IN
  • Overcast
  • 37°
    Overcast
  • Comment

Money for The Road? Alaskans weigh in

Funding expected to be announced this week

Posted: April 6, 2014 - 11:03pm
Back | Next
Mike Miller speaks against the Juneau Access Road project in front of the Senate Finance Committee at the Capitol on Thursday.  Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Mike Miller speaks against the Juneau Access Road project in front of the Senate Finance Committee at the Capitol on Thursday.

The final funding allocation for a proposed road out of Juneau that would effectively connect the capital city to the rest of the state should be known this week.

The revised capital budget bill, SB119, which initially included $35 million for the Juneau Access Project — $5 million in state funds, and $30 million in federal dollars — will likely be revealed early this week.

With less than two weeks left in the regular session and the updated budget not yet public, Alaskans chimed in on the governor’s proposals Thursday and Saturday.

Juneauites testified to the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday.

The tally for those talking about the proposed road was 10 in favor and seven opposed, said James Sullivan, legislative organizer for the Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, a major opponent of the proposed route.

“There are numerous questions, and a great many problems revolve around this project — they have for decades,” Sullivan said before asking the Legislature to not fund the project.

He added that approving funding for the road would be premature, because a supplemental environmental impact statement, which will shed light on some of the specific construction needs of the project and give a clearer picture of the total cost, has not yet been released. It’s now expected to be published early June.

“It will be a boondoggle. Alaska can’t afford one during this time of revenue crisis,” he said. “There is very, very little payback on this very expensive project.”

Mike Miller, a mountaineering enthusiast and 20-year Juneau resident, told the committee that, having hiked the proposed route, the project is a “waste of time.”

“The hazards along this proposed route are phenomenal,” Miller said. “Just in 22.2 miles of the proposed road we have 112 geological hazards — there’s 52 rock fall hazardous areas, 42 debris flows, 31 avalanches and two landslides.

“It will probably take the National Guard just to keep this road open,” he added.

Still, those opposed to the road were in the minority at the Thursday hearing. Many of those in support pointed to the cost-savings of building and maintaining a road versus using ferries.

“There are places you can’t get to unless you get on the boat and go, and those places need to have better service,” Juneau Mayor Merrill Sanford said. “Juneau Access supports that changeover from a place where we can have a road to better access for our small communities on the islands that make up our archipelago.”

Paulette Simpson, a Douglas resident, told the committee that ferries will always be needed due to Southeast Alaska’s geography, but added that building roads to shorten those trips is the “most fiscally responsible path forward.”

“I’m not interested in ferries going away, but that doesn’t mean that roads should not be allowed particularly when Southeast and the state have so much to gain,” she said. “Economic activity in our region will increase substantially both during road construction and after road completion when fish, freight and people can be moved quickly and at a much lower cost.”

The Juneau Empire is planning a special section on the history, concerns, possible alternatives and proposed plan for the Juneau Access Project that will be published after the supplemental environmental impact statement is released later this year.

  • Comment

Comments (26) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Bill Knabke
965
Points
Bill Knabke 04/07/14 - 05:43 am
12
10
30 million in federal dollars?

If the rest of the country is ready to ante up that kind of money for Juneau, which I doubt, why not spend it on projects of higher priority such as: Water and sewer upgrades, a modern incinerator for our waste, swimming pool repairs, etc., etc.

. Shannara
2316
Points
. Shannara 04/07/14 - 05:58 am
11
3
erm.... what? Is this a NEW

erm.... what? Is this a NEW Juneau Access project? One that actually connects us with the rest of the world? Or is this the fake Juneau Access project? The one that connects us to a ... ferry .....?

This JE article seems to be contradictory.

Clay Good
1880
Points
Clay Good 04/07/14 - 06:04 am
18
8
The New Dead End

I took a ferry to Haines last week. An easy, comfortable ride that started at the ferry terminal just a few miles from where we all live.

As I watched the miles drift by on the four hour ride, I noted the number of avalanches that have made it all the way down to the ocean this year along the proposed road route.

It made me grateful for the safety and convenience of ferries and that I didn't have to drive an extra 80 miles to catch a ferry at a new dead end.

We have a perfectly good dead end right now that ends at beautiful Berners Bay.

Brad Fluetsch
2075
Points
Brad Fluetsch 04/07/14 - 06:04 am
8
16
Build the Road!

It will never get cheaper, it will create many jobs, it will open up more land for all kinds of recreational, tourism, opportunities, it will lower the cost of living in Juneau.

Mark Stopha
92
Points
Mark Stopha 04/07/14 - 06:27 am
14
6
"The final funding allocation

"The final funding allocation for a proposed road out of Juneau that would effectively connect the capital city to the rest of the state should be known this week."

Isn't this a 90 mile car ride to another ferry terminal, such that, say, any student headed to Haines or Skagway for a school event will now have to have mommy and daddy run them out on at least a 3 hour round trip to and from the terminal to drop them off, then another 3 hour round trip back to pick up little Johnny? Or are we going to spend more money that's not there in the education budget to bus them on this 6 hour odyssey? And if kids are coming down from Haines or Skagway, won't they be out of breath for their basketball game having to walk the 90 miles to Juneau from the ferry terminal?

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377993/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377988/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377983/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377978/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377963/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377948/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377943/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/377938/
Northern lights

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING