After a seven-year hiatus spurred by questionable content and sealed by the popularity of another student publication, the J-Bird is back. The Juneau-Douglas High School student newspaper, first seen as early as the 1920s, has been revived by 16-year-old Sam Kurland, a senior at the high school and the publication’s editor-in-chief. With the support of English department chair Carol Jordan, Kurland and a group of his peers have been on the high school beat since August, though the ambitious teen had begun efforts in the previous school year.
The J-Bird’s first print edition in seven years is dated Oct. 18, 2012 and leads with the bold headline “THE J-BIRD SOARS BACK!” The paper includes eight pages of content, including school news reporting, editorial and opinions, photos and an outline of the J-Bird’s editorial policies, as determined by the current staff.
In the wake of the October 2011 death of beloved JDHS English teacher Ali McKenna, who inspired and advised students to create monthly magazines The Ego and its satirical counterpart The Alterego, the student body found itself without a voice.
In Melissa Bowhay’s article on the return of the student paper, science teacher and former J-Bird advisor Jonathan Smith articulated the sentiment behind the dissolution of The Ego and the re-emergence of the J-Bird.
“…The Ego was Ms. McKenna’s and the loss of the Ego is a reminder of the loss of a great teacher. But I think that the J-Bird is a great tradition and root to our history.”
Kurland dates the J-Bird back as early as 1923, though he said there have been “anecdotal reports of people having seen editions from earlier than that…” The last printing was in 2004.
“There were a variety of unfortunate events that led to the halt in publication of the paper.” Kurland said, “I think one of them was the incident in, I believe it was 2002, when there was an article published in the J-Bird that compared a pretty decisive victory by the JDHS basketball team over the Sitka Wolves basketball team to child abuse and rape, which, in retrospect was a very poor editorial decision, and was met with a lot of criticism from the community — and justly so. The paper lost a good deal of its credibility at that point. And after that the staff dwindled and the paper shifted more and more toward opinion and became almost entirely an opinion journal, by very few student authors.”
The disintegration of the J-Bird coincided with the rise of The Ego, with the more literary publication taking the newspaper’s place until last school year.
Kurland, an avid consumer of news and current high school senior, approached Jordan during that last school year, with a group of other enthusiastic students.
“Sam and a couple of his friends came last year to me … and asked if I would be interested in advising the J-Bird and I said that I would.” Jordan said, “We had to get approval to become a club — there are only a certain number of clubs available at JDHS, so we had to get approval from the committee, which decides which clubs are allowed to go forward, and we were approved, so Sam and his group… tried to start up last fall.”
As with many bold moves and big ideas, the revival of the paper didn’t immediately come to fruition.
“To start a successful paper, especially a paper that has had issues in the past like the J-Bird, requires a lot of time. It was something that my peers and I weren’t necessarily prepared for. We weren’t necessarily realistic with ourselves, I guess you could say, about what we would be able to take on, given the other obligations that we had. We gave it a shot, we tried to pull some things together, and ultimately last year we weren’t successful, we didn’t get off the ground, we didn’t get a publication. But I think we learned really valuable lessons from that.” Kurland said.
Kurland, who became editor-in-chief by merit of organizing the effort to bring back the J-Bird, is trying to strike a balance between uncensored speech, which led to the paper’s demise almost a decade ago, and what he considered to be too much editorial control in the earlier attempt to resuscitate.
“We learned about what our organizational structure should look like, which is very different from what it looked like last year, and I think that, at least for me, it really helped shape my perception of what the paper should be and it helped me really appreciate that individual students who write for a student newspaper should have a lot of freedom in what they write about. That’s part of what makes student papers so vibrant and so diverse, and really so strong and so meaningful to their communities,” Kurland explained, “So that was one of the biggest takeaways for me. There certainly has to be some editorial direction, but we have to give individuals more freedom and control of what they’re writing than we did (last year). And that shapes what we’re doing right now, and I think that’s a big reason we have the paper on Ms. Jordan’s wall right now.”
Jordan, as the advisor, guided the students in developing their editorial philosophy.
“Sam and I really discussed the ideas behind the policies, and when the students do editorials, how much are we going to accept or change, how much are we going to modify the message or not modify it — we really had a heart-to-heart discussion about the importance of our integrity. Me, as a staff member at JDHS and an English teacher, I have a certain credibility I need to maintain, so we did discuss the policy and we do have a section that identifies that for the readers.” Jordan said.
A significant amount of effort and research went into crafting the editorial policy that stands, one the staff believes meets the needs of the paper and the audience.
“Basically it’s a declaration of journalistic freedom, saying ‘These are the things we, as a newspaper, as a student organization, have a right to do, and we’ll defend our right.’ The other section I think is most relevant … is the statement of duties to the student body. ‘We as a responsible paper have some responsibilities, if we’re going to remain credible with the population we serve, with our audience, we need to have some core values that we’re really going to stick to.’” Kurland explained.
The paper on the wall, and the other copies circulating, are the product of the efforts of nearly a dozen students. The paper features eight student writers, almost all without specific roles or titles, including Kurland, Bowhay, Ruby Steedle, Melanya Mason, Ari Gross, Kaialee Mercado, Talyn Ramos, Tommy Thompson and Leo Steedle. A microcosm of the greater community, the JDHS paper features election results — for the student council, reporting on events, change and controversy, sports coverage and opinions on policy. The paper also features an impassioned editorial by Kurland defending free speech and invoking integrity.
It’s a paper born of the passion of a handful of students, who write for themselves and for their audience.
“The students write about what they are interested in — and we throw out ideas for the newspaper, Sam writes them up on the board, but students pick what they are interested in pursuing.” Jordan said. “And there’s a lot of student population interest; in all my classes they’re asking “How often are we going to publish” and so there’s a lot of student and staff interest, I mentioned it at a staff meeting last week and we got a round of applause for bringing it back. It’s very exciting that people are really looking forward to the next edition.”
It’s money that had been, and will continue to be, the biggest hurdle for the J-Bird, as with any print publication.
“We grew to critical mass and Sam told me that the real hindrance to actual publishing was the funding and he told me that it cost about $250 to publish and that the Empire had generously agreed to publish for us, to actually print them,” Jordan said, “ so I went and found out how we could get the money … and I told the administration that we wanted this amount of money and that we wanted to publish and we needed this amount of money. We were given access to the $250 so we published our first issue. From here on in, however, we have to rely on advertising.”
Some of the funding was from The Ego’s budget, some from private donations. Starting with the next printing, and the subsequent monthly printings, it will come from the community.
“We would like to see the paper published monthly, but with breaking news posted online.” Kurland said. “We’re also on Twitter and Facebook, because we reach, actually, a lot more students that way, than we do on our homepage. I think that’s great. Social media’s a lot faster than a static website.”
Though Kurland is uncertain about his future plans —who does know at 16-years-old what they’ll be when they grow up? — he’s applying for colleges and he knows what he’d like to see from the J-Bird — and he’s confident the staff who will remain can pull it off.
“Long-term aspirations? Really just to see the J-Bird return to the sustainable, responsible, credible paper that it was for the vast majority of its life. This is a paper that was really a huge part of the JDHS community for, like, 75 years — it was the thing, they read it when it came out, everyone wanted to be a part of it, and I think, given the reception for our first print edition, I think we can get there and I think we should.”
• Contact Neighbors editor Melissa Griffiths at 523-2272 or at melissa.griffiths@juneauempire.com.





Comments (7)
Add commentPeople's History of the J-Bird
I was the humor editor that approved the column in question, "Wolves Beaten Like Old Rug." Ran in the March 2002 issue. Column was purely fictitious, however paper was on the stands when the Sitka Wolves were in town. Faculty advisor for J-Bird at the time was Kristin Garot.
Principal Leslie Morse pulled all copies from stands and put the paper on hiatus for April. We might have been allowed to put out a paper in May, I don't recall.
Fall 2002 paper was not allowed to start publishing so I and some friends started an alternative student newspaper, the Jive-Turkey. Empire has a feature article on us here: http://juneauempire.com/stories/110502/loc_alt.paper.shtml . Other friends started the Artichoke, humorous/parody newspaper.
In winter 2002 Bill Chalmers agreed to be faculty advisor and official publication began again. We printed issues all spring semester with a five-person editorial staff and twenty regular contributors.
2004 other people were in charge and put out a full year of issues. I believe 2005 was the last year to publish J-Birds.
Major missing context: the J-Bird until 2001 was advised by Laurie Scandling and a majority of contributors were members of the Phoenix program. The closure of the Phoenix program, followed by the administration's aggressive response to the Wolves article (following George W. Bush presidency and its reaction to 9/11), were all part of a high school environment that was very hostile to student expression and freedom.
2003 the last year there was an open campus for all grade levels; the first year there was a formal dress code.
2003 at school dances Ms. Morse smelled the breath of all attendees as they lined up outside the commons entrance. A DJ told me he'd get fired if he played Sex on the Beach, the last time he played it he got "in all kinds of trouble."
Saying that students grew tired of publishing ignores the reality of a multi-year program to restrict student freedom that profoundly disenchanted many of the school's most talented writers and journalists.
Wolves Beaten Like Old
Wolves Beaten Like Old Rug
Sitka’s playoff dreams were shattered like a beer bottle on pavement recently, as the entire team was (metaphorically) taken out back, bent over their opponent’s knee, and beaten with a leather strop until they could no longer stand, bringing their already shameful season into the muck of sin and loss.
The Bears understandably felt little more then boredom as they crushed their pitiful competition. As one of their triumphant players put it, “For some, defeat occurs so often that it is a way of life. When such a thing happens to the players of a team, defeating them, even by the astounding margins we handily scored, brings no joy; it is the moral equivalent of smothering a baby. Sitka deserved nothing; only to be humiliated and destroyed--something we showed them again and again as our shots landed like slaps on a crying face.”
Spirits were not so high on the Wolves’ side. “When I dropped that ball, I was also, in a sense, dropping the soap,” said an anonymous player in reference to the many steals that were landed against her , which were just one more nail in the weighty lid of the coffin burying the Wolves alive. “ And while the bright lights and cheering stands of the gym initially bore little resemblance to a prison shower, the pain and humiliation of losing so abjectly was remarkably similar to that I would feel if a 500-pound lifer named Bubba was having his way with me.” Indeed, rape is one of best, and perhaps the only way, to describe just how incredible and lamentable the Wolves loss was. While other losses might be likened to the titanic and unpredictable struggle between a lioness and a bull elephant, this destruction can only be compared to child abuse.
“I see this not as a defeat,” said an anonymous couch when asked about the game, “but instead, the kind of whippin’ that you got when you tried as a four-year old to make your dad stop hitting your mother. We were not their opponents; we were just a squalling nuisance to pick up and teach a lesson. Just as a child might realize that they are powerless against their father and instead try to run, we tried to keep our defense together, and just as that child will be caught and beaten like a recalcitrant mule, so was our team unable to do anything but scream for mercy as they hit us again and again. Our only thought now is joy that we are alive.”
But such a joy is fleeting and unsatisfying, as well it should be. As said another player who wished to remain anonymous (an unsurprising desire, given that to be known as a Wolf is to be known as someone for whom defeat is not only a word, but a way of life), “Perhaps the worst part of all of this is the knowledge, deep down, that we deserved our loss. The other team was better, and being beaten like an egg white was simply a reminder from them to know our place and never aspire to anything. While it might be a hard lesson to have to learn, at least now they have stopped hitting us, and we can hide pitifully until next year, when all except for the seniors--oh, those lucky seniors!--will have to stand upon that court again, and look at the opposite team, and know then that for them being smacked around like a mob informant, whose lengthy and agonizing death mirrors the death of our self-esteem and hope, is the only way possible.”
alex_gh Thanks for all the
alex_gh
Thanks for all the background!! Very intriguing and interesting.
Bravo!
Congratulations, Sam, Ms. Jordan, and the rest of the J Bird crew.
Apart from the importance of student writing and freedom of speech, the J Bird is one of Juneau's oldest and most important journalistic traditions. I have seen issues dating back to 1921.
Though it was short-sighted and irresponsible for admin to squelch this important student voice in the first place, it is very good news that you have taken it back. Thank you and Good Luck!
Good Luck J-Bird!
I still have a few dusty issues left over from the 80's.
Carry on! And for goodness sake proofread better than the Empire does, will you? :)
Freedom vs. control
Alex, thanks for sharing. I chose not to get too deep into the history, hoping to focus on where the paper is heading now (and because there is always more to a story and we can't always delve that deep), but as we are here, I am curious if you would have made the same choice in approving the column today as you did then?
I will defend free speech to the end, but I also feel as an editor that I have a choice to print or not print a piece that could offend — and I find rape and abuse analogies to be quite offensive — if I felt a somewhat graphic description of rape would be necessary to express an important idea I could justify printing it, but regarding a sports team that isn't doing so well? Definitely not.
So I'll speak to the administration's decision to pull that paper, and none of the other actions, and say I understand. A person has a right to say these things, but the paper and the school are in no way obligated to provide a platform under the first amendment.
That being said, blocking future issues of the J-Bird, or any further punitive action, would seem to impinge on that right.
And swimmergirl, let me know if I made any egregious errors.
I wouldn't print that column
I wouldn't print that column today. I would print an even more graphic column if:
1) That column had a clear point.
2) That column challenged our rapist, violent status quo.
The column makes a joke out of the truth: women in America are not safe. American prisons torture millions of innocent people. Hideous violence sustains our modern life.
The truth isn’t simple. The J-Bird was censored and I was threatened with expulsion because . . . some people in Sitka spray-painted graffiti against Juneau? Because principals didn't want fights during Region V?
I don't think it was because the paper relentlessly criticized previous-Principal Soboleff and Ms. Morse's autocratic top-down approaches towards students. Ms. Morse in our meetings baffled and brittle, sometimes apologetic, but never vindictive. She wanted to make clear that it wasn't because she was small-minded that she was censoring the paper.
Pretty much every adult who was involved with the matter had a pained, self-conscious attitude. "You should fight for free speech only if it is actually worth defending. This particular article is not worth defending. Accept that and you can start publishing again."
I thank those adults for their patience and compassion. I only wish that those valuable conversations had come before the paper was published, rather than after.
Hideous violence and preventable suffering happen every single day, sustained by our careful censorship of politeness and respect. Adults pretend that by keeping “[filtered word]” off our televisions we help the children starving in freezing, forgotten inner-city schools.
The counterpoint the white male college-bound high schooler who pretended his ignorant speech did anything more than enact violence and oppression.
That column was not worth losing a year of school-sponsored publication.