This image from the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation’s Wednesday presentation to the Alaska Legislature shows the major components of the proposed trans-Alaska natural gas pipeline. (screenshot)

This image from the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation’s Wednesday presentation to the Alaska Legislature shows the major components of the proposed trans-Alaska natural gas pipeline. (screenshot)

Gas pipeline negotiations continue

No major new developments as state-owned corporation provides update to Legislature

Correction: The proposed pipeline would be 807 miles, not 907 miles.

The multibillion-dollar trans-Alaska natural gas pipeline project is still advancing, state lawmakers were told in a Wednesday morning hearing.

At a regular quarterly update in Anchorage, executives from the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation told legislators they are working on contracts with potential gas customers in Asia.

The corporation has 15 “letters of interest” from customers, and it is trying to turn those into “definitive agreements,” AGDC President Keith Meyer told reporters before Wednesday’s hearing. Meyer was meeting with potential investors and did not participate in the hearing.

Sen. Cathy Giessel, R-Anchorage, and Rep. Geran Tarr, D-Anchorage, chaired Wednesday’s meeting, and each said they didn’t hear anything particularly groundbreaking from Wednesday’s presentation, which included information from AGDC as well as the Alaska Department of Revenue and the Alaska Department of Natural Resources.

According to the latest figures presented at Wednesday’s meeting, the AKLNG (Alaska Liquefied Natural Gas) project would spend $44 billion to construct a 807-mile pipeline bracketed by a pair of massive industrial plants. At the southern end, in the Kenai Peninsula community of Nikiski, would be a facility designed to export the gas onto tankers bound for ports in Asia.

The plan, which is being pushed by Gov. Bill Walker as a successor to efforts started by former governors Sarah Palin and Sean Parnell, is the latest iteration of ideas that have been on the table since the trans-Alaska Pipeline System began shipping crude oil 41 years ago.

The AGDC, a state-owned corporation, is in charge of developing the project. That includes negotiating contracts with gas providers (North Slope oil companies) and gas buyers (utilities in Asia). With those deals in hand, the state would be able to find investors to fund construction of the project. When the pipeline begins operation, the plan calls for those investors to be paid off over a period of 20-30 years, leaving the state with full ownership.

While a gas pipeline has been a political issue since the 1970s, Department of Revenue deputy commissioner Mike Barnhill told lawmakers, “We may be at that point where we seriously consider how we do this.”

AGDC representatives provided an update on the multi-year federal permitting process and said they have found an American supplier for the steel pipe that may be used in the project. That matters because recent tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on imported steel pipe had threatened to increase the cost of the pipeline.

“That’s a very good positive,” AGDC vice president Frank Richards said of the American supplier, “because previously we didn’t see that there was 42-inch (pipe) being rolled in the United States.”

Lawmakers are keeping a close eye on the project because the state is likely to shoulder a one-quarter share of construction costs. At $44 billion, that would mean an $11 billion payment.

The Alaska Permanent Fund is not seriously considering an investment at present, lawmakers were told.

Sens. Click Bishop, R-Fairbanks, and Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, each said that it will be absolutely critical for the state to be accurate with its cost estimates. Construction of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline system was three times as expensive as forecast, and a state-owned gas pipeline cannot do that.

“I don’t mind betting the cow,” Stedman said. “There’s no way I’m betting the farm.”


• Contact reporter James Brooks at jbrooks@juneauempire.com or 523-2258.


More in News

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Aurora forecast for the week of March 18

These forecasts are courtesy of the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute… Continue reading

A board in the House Chambers at the Alaska State Capitol shows Monday’s vote tally of 39-20 to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of Senate Bill 140, one vote short of the two-thirds necessary. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Legislature fails by a single vote of 39-20 to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of education bill

Legislators warn bad blood may hamper other issues as numerous Republicans abandon earlier support.

With COVID-19 aid, more schools gave students and families experiencing homelessness prepaid cards to buy necessities like groceries and gas. (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)
Grocery cards and car repairs: How COVID aid changed the way schools can help homeless kids

Juneau student services specialist among those finding creative ways to provide assistance.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Saturay, March 16, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Friday, March 15, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy discusses his veto of a wide-ranging education bill during a press conference Friday at the Alaska State Capitol. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Veto override vote on education bill expected to have consequences — and no assurance of extra funds

Retaliation by governor, fractured relationships within Legislature on other issues among concerns.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Thursday, March 14, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Kaskanak Creek in the Bristol Bay’s Kvichak watershed is seen from the air on Sept. 27, 2011. Threats to the watershed and other sites were cited by the Environmental Protection Agency when it issued a decision barring permitting of the Pebble mine. But the Dunleavy administration and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. have taken legal action to try to reverse that decision. (Photo provided by Environmental Protection Agency
State lawsuit claims federal government owes Alaska $700 billion for quashing Pebble mine

The federal government owes Alaska more than $700 billion in compensation for… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest (Photo by U.S. Forest Service)
New Department of Interior opinion promises to recognize expanded tribal jurisdiction in Alaska

Tribes can exert jurisdiction over allotments granted to individual Natives, opinion states.

Most Read