• Overcast, light rain
  • 55°
    Overcast, light rain
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Trained to kill

Posted: April 6, 2011 - 8:42pm

war crime

that which violates

international laws of war

as if laws are effective

in wartime

— from the poem “War–the concise version” by Rachel Bentham

In a case that attracted national attention, 22-year-old Jeremy Morlock of Wasilla pleaded guilty to participating in the cold-blooded murder of three unarmed civilians while deployed in Afghanistan. Before he was sentenced to 24 years in prison for his war crime, prosecuting attorney Capt. Andre Leblanc defended the U.S. Army’s honor. “We don’t do this” he said. “This is not how we’re trained.” If it wasn’t the Army that turned Morlock into a murderer, who did?

Freelance journalist Mark Boal examined the case in a lengthy investigative report for Rolling Stone magazine. He argues “Morlock was the kind of bad-news kid whom the Army might have passed on” if there hadn’t been a significant troop shortage when he enlisted. Boal’s speculation was based on reports that as a teenager Morlock often got drunk and into fights, and was once charged with leaving the scene of a serious car accident.

Should Morlock’s problems have disqualified him from serving his country? According to Army regulations, persons with “questionable moral character” are unfit for duty. But were his youthful infractions that far beyond those experienced by other high school boys? And isn’t it true that many people have become responsible adults after overcoming serious mistakes made during their teenage years?

Furthermore, military service is often considered the best medicine for kids like Morlock. Their transformation from boys to men begins in basic training where they’re taught to conform to a rigid set of values while developing a high standard of discipline. Unfortunately, they are also trained to kill.

To begin to understand this part of their intensive conditioning we have to flash back to the work of General S.L.A. Marshall, the Army’s chief combat historian during World War II. In Men Against Fire, a book published after the war, he made the astonishing claim 75 percent of soldiers in combat never fired their personal weapons with the intent to kill the enemy. Marshall wrote “the average individual still has such an inner resistance toward killing a fellow man that he will not take life if it is possible to turn away from that decision.”

The documentary film “Soldiers of Conscience” offers insights into the military’s response to Marshall’s conclusion. Made with official permission of the U.S. Army, Maj. Pete Kilmer explains the objective of a technique known as reflexive fire. The training teaches soldiers to instinctively fire two rounds into a target within seconds. Once mastered, they can effectively overcome the resistance that prevented so many from pulling the trigger in combat. But Kilmer adds the “price for that is they’re not thinking through the great moral decision of killing another human being.”

Reflexive firing alone can’t account for Morlock’s loss of moral sense — it didn’t happen in the heat of battle. His platoon sought opportunities to kill unarmed “hajis,” the derogatory name for Muslims commonly used by American troops. And another way soldiers learn to kill without hesitation is racial dehumanization.

Despite denials by the military, many veterans claim basic training emphasizes dehumanization. Because it’s easier to kill a person perceived as being less than human, soldiers are encouraged to believe their enemy is a lower form of life instead of a worthy human adversary. But such thinking fosters such deep hatred that it can readily grow to include civilians from the demonized culture.

None of this is an excuse for the murder of innocents. And it would be grossly unjust to project the bad deeds of a few onto the rest of America’s troops. But just as some soldiers from the battlefield evolve into conscientious objectors, it seems reflexive fire and dehumanization can pull others down into the hell of the morally dead.

No one can predict what the psychological impact will be on a soldier who takes his basic training into live combat. Thus it’s reasonable to believe Jeremy Morlock had a chance to become a normal, responsible adult until he was trained by the Army to kill. He then lost his soul while serving our nation in a lawless enterprise we call war.

• Moniak is a Juneau resident.

  • Comment

Comments (9)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 04/07/11 - 08:04 am
0
0

Wow Rich. Thats a new low,

Wow Rich. Thats a new low, even for you.

lawrence a love
61
Points
lawrence a love 04/07/11 - 08:06 am
0
0

yea right

Care for a bowl of nuts;
For cryin out loud how does anyone expect a trained soldier to complete his duties if he constantly questions what he or she has to do ,in the heat of battle!
The main concept here is this ONE individual chose to go against his basic moral military training and take advantage of an oportunity to try to circumvent the code of conduct and rules of engagement .
And he is not the only one,there are more.
America is in a very serious WAR and the majority of Americans better wake up and realize this middle eastern thing is not going to end well,the Muslims had most of Europe and asia for a few hundred years till they were pushed back to their little archach world,and now revenge is best served COLD,they will take you neck, INFEDELS get no MERCY

Persnickety Persimmon
4173
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 04/07/11 - 08:30 am
0
0

Hi Lawrence. First of all,

Hi Lawrence. First of all, muslims did not have most of Europe and Asia for a few hundred years. The Ottoman Empire did push into Europe back in the 16th century (and the English sided with them--hope you're not Anglo), but they were stopped in Austria, and after Suleiman I died, they only lost ground until the collapse of the empire in World War I.

Second, until the British Empire gained prominence, the muslim world was the most advanced scientifically and culturally. They had equal rights laws while Europeans were still persecuting Jews.

And third, this Middle Eastern thing COULD end well if we'd stop solving all our problems with bombs.

And as for this military guy... Come on. You know it's true that the military teaches you to dehumanize the enemy so it's easier to kill them. You know it teaches you to follow orders rather than think about them. You know (from experiments!) that when given power over another human being, a normal person will abuse it. So it is obvious that Richard Moniak has a point. It IS the military's fault, in a way. It took a 22 year old kid to pull the trigger, but it took a military establishment to make him capable of doing so, just as it does for most participants in war.

lawrence a love
61
Points
lawrence a love 04/07/11 - 09:17 am
0
0

not buying it

Thanks for the small correction in history ,must have had another era on my mind.
As to the military aspect not acceptable,I was in the military 4 years and i can guarntee you as in infantryman and mortarman,suckin mud to serve.
There is no way an honest serviceman would go against his code of conduct or commit atrocities willingly!!
Stuff happens and then the lies fly!!!

Persnickety Persimmon
4173
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 04/07/11 - 09:26 am
0
0

The majority of our military

The majority of our military members would never mean to commit this sort of thing, I'm sure, and most of them don't. But they do when put into the proper situation. Look at Abu Grahib and similar prison centers--the people manning those facilities were honest servicemen, and they were put in a position of power over people they'd been taught to dehumanize.

Check out the Stanford Prison Experiment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Mind you, this was just a simulation--not even the real thing. Under the right circumstances, any person will become corrupt and do terrible things.

I will say this, though: our military (and the militaries of other developed nations) is FAR better than militaries of the past were. It used to be that both sides would rape and pillage and loot and murder and they'd get away with it. It doesn't happen as often anymore, and our military deals with it most of the time, it seems like.

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 04/07/11 - 09:55 am
0
0

Moniak, just admit it, you

Moniak, just admit it, you hate our military. While you sit in your easy chair lobbing bs, you might want to take a minute to thank our heroes for the liberties you enjoy. You jerk.

Rolling Stone is a piece of crap too. They have one agenda - to smear our military with lies.

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/calling-[filtered word]-on-rolling-stone.htm

A few bad apples does not an entire group make. Why don't you spend a minute in a soldier's shoes before you 'bless' us with your santimonious drivel? You don't have a clue....

silverwings
314
Points
silverwings 04/07/11 - 01:15 pm
0
0

Yeah Rich, it couldn't have

Yeah Rich, it couldn't have been all the drugs Morlock was using. He was just a good kid turned bad by the Army. Snap your head out of your hindquarters. One of the the first classes we got at the reception station was the laws of land warfare, while waiting for our first haircut. Whereas you would blame the Army in general, I believe that the greatest contributer here is Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs. An authority figure, getting his kicks by knowingly violating laws, how hard is it to convince subordinates, that "we can do whatever we please"?

Oh, and Kevin, re your Islamic European history. Don't forget that the Moors held most of the Iberian peninsula for about 750 years.

madison89
1040
Points
madison89 04/08/11 - 06:58 am
0
0

"....a technique known as

Unpublished

"....a technique known as reflexive fire". "Once mastered, they can effectively overcome the resistance that prevented so many from pulling the trigger in combat", possibly SAVING their lives since the islamist they are fighting will not hesitate to kill us.
Hesitation can cost our soldiers their lives.

madison89
1040
Points
madison89 04/08/11 - 06:58 am
0
0

"....a technique known as

Unpublished

"....a technique known as reflexive fire". "Once mastered, they can effectively overcome the resistance that prevented so many from pulling the trigger in combat", possibly SAVING their lives since the islamist they are fighting will not hesitate to kill us.
Hesitation can cost our soldiers their lives.

akromper
-4
Points
akromper 04/08/11 - 08:26 am
0
0

Reflexive fire & drugs

Good point Pub. I agree with in part with the posters that say this guy bears the brunt of responsibility for his own behavior. However, since we agree that the army trains you to "get over" the moral upbringing most of us have not to kill, what do you do with soldiers after the fact? More and more the people trained to kill are not career soldiers. There is a less talked about fact that law enforcement looks to tap into this soldier mentality market, but then is now faced with trigger happy LEO that view the public as the enemy. MANY lawsuits for abuse and overkill. Dead is dead no matter whose fault it is.

My opinion is that the military does in fact share some responsibility here, and more than we'd like to admit. In the recent times of lowering standards to keep enlistment numbers up maybe a few questionable factors are not being considered. If you have in irresponsible angry teen, what happens when you give him a gun? If you train someone to kill without question, how can you assure the public that when he gets in a bar fight people won't get killed instead of teeth being knocked out? Just sayin.
I don't envy soldiers. At all. I know my own temper and figure NOT getting a concealed carry is the better idea. But how many people posting are so sure that "instinct training" without the proper subjects in the first place is a good idea. There is no perfect training on imperfect creatures.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING