• Few clouds
  • 55°
    Few clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Oil: An addiction at odds with freedom

Posted: June 28, 2011 - 9:05pm

America’s Independence Day is around the corner. It’s the most prominent day each year that we celebrate our freedom from the British Empire. There will be fireworks, parades, and endless flag waving. It’s all good, as long as there’s room for those who question a way of life dependent on oil, because dissention is the first heartbeat of true freedom.

We aren’t a perfect nation, and never have been. The preamble to our Constitution implies it’s a work in progress, not a fact ordained without the great pains of change. It took decades before we abolished slavery and ended warfare against Native Americans. And for our first 150 years women were relegated to second class citizenship. Those changes required a dedication to dissent.

Americans aren’t unique in resisting change. This observation is forever engraved in the country’s cherished Declaration of Independence — “all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” Indeed, clinging to any status quo leads to forms of dependency that stand in harsh opposition to everything the Fourth of July is about.

We can’t truly define independence without admitting where it doesn’t exist. So as we celebrate our freedom, let’s also open the book on our modern day dependency on oil. It’s the driver of the engines that take us to and from our jobs. It’s an essential ingredient in the asphalt roads we drive on and it runs the equipment used to build and maintain them. We not only need oil to get to the grocery store, others consume barrels more to ship our food from far away places.

Oil gets us to the harbors in summer and Eaglecrest in winter, where we’ll burn more to go out fishing or to get a lift to the top of the ski hill. We get anxious when the rising price of oil jacks up the cost of gasoline at the pump and inflates our home or business heating bills. Meanwhile, our state’s economy and sacred Permanent Fund thrive whenever the spot price of Alaska crude climbs higher.

Our demand for oil is forever increasing as our population grows. More than half of what we consume is imported. American presidents have been talking about reducing our dependence on foreign oil since the first energy crisis in 1973. But the amount of oil we import each year has jumped from 49 billion gallons in 1973 to 140 billion in 2010.

“We will not apologize for our way of life,” said President Barack Obama in his inaugural speech that echoed his predecessor’s militant defense of our freedom to consume oil at will. And it’s not all burned here at home. According to Sharon Burke, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Pentagon, our military consumes more than 7 million gallons of oil every day in Afghanistan and Iraq. That was before Obama began his warring foray into the skies over Libya, after which oil prices rose to a 30-month high.

President Obama hasn’t sought congressional approval to continue this latest military action because he says it’s not a war. As a result, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., is warning Congress and us all that “the president is becoming an absolute monarch,” and “we must put a stop to that right now, if we don’t want to become an empire instead of a republic.”

Nadler needs a history lesson though. America has been building its overseas empire since the end of World War II. And since 1980 we’ve been prepared to use the military to protect access to Middle East oil. That’s when President Jimmy Carter told Americans an “attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault” on our vital interests and “will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.”

Before the American Revolution, the British Empire protected its economic interests by stationing troops in their North American colonies. Now we’re the empire with military occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan protecting our way of life. And whether we admit or not, it’s sustained by an addiction to oil that’s at odds with the freedom we celebrate.

• Moniak is a Juneau resident.

  • Comment

Comments (13)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
madison89
1040
Points
madison89 06/29/11 - 07:48 am
0
0

"But the amount of oil we

Unpublished

"But the amount of oil we import each year has jumped from 49 billion gallons in 1973 to 140 billion in 2010. "
And that is because so much of our lands has been placed off limits to oil development. Or hurdles placed in the way of the development of domestic supplies.

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 06/29/11 - 10:01 am
0
0

Rich, only a true progressive

Rich, only a true progressive could equate America's sacred Declaration of Independence with the amount of oil our country imports every year.

I would disagree that we are in Iraq and Afghanistan for oil. That talking point from the left is old. I would not call our "dependence" on oil an addiction, just more semantics to further the left's agenda. I would call oil the engine that happens to drive our economy at this point in history.

Here's a solution - let's start drilling in America and then we won't need to import so much oil.

Great pass you gave BO on the Libyan WAR too. Is that war one of the "right" wars?

Persnickety Persimmon
4173
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 06/29/11 - 09:16 am
0
0

Hi Calypso. At it again, I

Hi Calypso. At it again, I see. I believe both swimmergirl and I have both proven your argument that we can significantly reduce oil imports through domestic drilling wrong. On several occasions. Which leads me to believe you either have anterograde amnesia (are unable to form new memories), or are knowingly saying things that are false. Which is it?

Also, Mr. Moniak makes an excellent point. How free are we, exactly, if we can't function without importing oil, particularly from borderline hostile countries like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia?

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 06/29/11 - 01:07 pm
0
0

p, don't use such big words -

p, don't use such big words - anterograde amnesia - you're confusing me!

And stop with all the sanctimony. For every article you find that says drilling won't reduce oil imports, I'll find one that says it will.

It's not nice to call people liars and it hurts your argument. You can do better than that anyway.

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 06/29/11 - 01:08 pm
0
0

p, don't use such big words -

p, don't use such big words - anterograde amnesia - you're confusing me!

And stop with all the sanctimony. For every article you find that says drilling won't reduce oil imports, I'll find one that says it will.

It's not nice to call people liars and it hurts your argument. You can do better than that anyway.

MagicsJohnson
-7
Points
MagicsJohnson 06/29/11 - 09:45 am
0
0

Less than 15 year supply

If we exteacted every drop we could on US land/ocean and lake bottoms we can't come close to producing the oil we use.

The USGS has estimated that up to 112 billion barrels of “technically recoverable oil resources” remain on U.S. lands.

The U.S. currently consumes about 26 million barrels of oil a day.

Persnickety Persimmon
4173
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 06/29/11 - 09:47 am
0
0

Calypso

No you won't. You'll find right-wing blogs that say "drill baby, drill!" but offer nothing in the way of proof (which, by the way, is easily accessible since we KNOW what the U.S.'s known oil reserves are). By the way, do you know the difference between an "article" and actual data?

And honestly, if your argument is, "well, I can offer tenuous support for my position," then perhaps you should abandon it.

MagicsJohnson
-7
Points
MagicsJohnson 06/29/11 - 09:49 am
0
0

Less Than You Think

A forecast of the amount of petroleum remaining to be discovered in a large region is a forecast of an uncertain quantity several orders of magnitude more uncertain than a forecast of what is ultimately recoverable with current technology from discovered deposits.” — Gordon Kaufman, professor of operations research and management, Sloan School of Management, MIT

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 06/29/11 - 09:53 am
0
0

p, it's too nice of a day to

p, it's too nice of a day to play wack-a-mole with you. See ya!

afishisborn
-15
Points
afishisborn 06/29/11 - 09:57 am
0
0

PP

Calypso's stated in the past (http://juneauempire.com/opinion/2011-06-22/we-dont-know-isnt-good-enough...) that he can't trust a news source if it doesn't come from a blog. He's basically affirmed that his own opinions are secondhand with no basis in fact whatsoever. He's no longer worth addressing, if he ever was. Best to ignore him, as he has nothing of value to say.

louskannen
56
Points
louskannen 06/29/11 - 10:48 am
0
0

Oil

FYI, see http://www.heatusa.com/crude-oil/buy-iraqs-oil/

Apparently where our imported oil comes from is the luck of the draw (or the bid). Looks like U.S. interests are served by maintaining oil production from whatever source, foreign or domestic.

According to http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level... we get more oil from Canada than from the entire ME, more crude from Mexico than from Saudi Arabia.

Rick, we likely agree about our military adventures in the ME though perhaps not about the motives. Of the top 15 countries from which we buy crude, we have significant troop levels in one and a relatively minor presence in one more (though we park our big sticks nearby). Those two together provide less than 20% of our imports though no doubt their contributions to the pool affect prices. Increased domestic production and/or a significant switch in the conterminous U.S. and Canada to LNG could buffer any upsets arising in the ME. We don't really "need" their oil.

I'd say we're not addicted to oil; we are using it for some of our current energy needs, primarily transportation. We use oil rather than alternatives because it is relatively abundant, inexpensive, dense, portable energy allowing us greater freedom of movement. We're not addicted to wood, either, though we use a lot of it. We use wood rather than alternatives because it is a relatively abundant, inexpensive, simple, easily-worked material with which to build things. Both oil and wood are commodities we find in our environment that prove useful. That we use them isn't an addiction, just common sense.

Common sense helps keep us free.

Lou

Persnickety Persimmon
4173
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 06/29/11 - 11:16 am
0
0

@louskannen: we ARE addicted

@louskannen: we ARE addicted to oil, though. Much in the way an alcoholic is addicted to alcohol, if we were to go cold turkey or even just severely reduce our usage, society would crumble. We have no viable modes of transportation other than trucks and planes, and without transportation many parts of the country (including most of Alaska) would starve, suffer massive, prolonged blackouts, and essentially come to a grinding halt.

The wood analogy doesn't work, because if we were to suffer a sudden, catastrophic shortage of wood, we'd be mostly fine. Some construction projects would be delayed, and a few people would have to turn on their baseboards, and perhaps you'd have to live without a new couch, but society would be just fine.

wmolson
4423
Points
wmolson 06/29/11 - 05:31 pm
0
0

One thing kind of bothers me

I keep seeing " Drill Baby Drill," but what happens if we drill, and drill and drill and still don't find any new oil deposits that we can extract.
It may be a nice cheerleader's chant but cheerleaders don't win ball games - what if there is no more oil where they explore?? Let me add ??

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING