On Sept. 15, the National Snow and Ice Data Center released data suggesting that 2011 was the second lowest Arctic Ocean ice extend year on record since 1979. Without question, diminishing Arctic ice is a reality. The only debate may be how much change is naturally cyclical and how much is anthropogenic. While the data may appear to suggest that maintaining polar icebreaking capabilities is inconsistent with a rapidly waning ice cap, the reality is that as long as the Earth remains tilted 23 and half degrees to the sun, the Arctic polar cap will accrete for half the year, resulting in greater demand for icebreaking services than in any other period in Arctic transportation history.
The physical properties of the Arctic Ocean currently facilitate navigable transportation during a portion of the summer and maritime activity will grow as economics dictate the efficacy of trans-Arctic shipping. At a minimum, energy extraction north of the Arctic Circle will result in increased human activity in the area. Maritime activity resulting from economic demands will manifest in the form of icebreakers, ice strengthened vessels and unreinforced ships that because of market needs may operate either too early or too late in the season and may require some form of assistance due to extreme weather. Because an ice-free Arctic for several weeks in the summer will be a reality by the middle of this century — the question for countries willing to engage in Arctic commerce will be how to adapt and embrace change to seize the opportunities that a changing Arctic provides. The question our legislators must address is whether the United States will be a contender or a pretender as an Arctic Nation. The former requires a measured investment in the Coast Guard’s polar icebreaking program, the latter simply status quo.
Sovereignty is expensive; developing infrastructure in an emerging Arctic Region is expensive; however, captivating the imagination of the American public and restoring national pride, ingenuity and economic opportunity is priceless. On Sept. 23, Sen. Mark Begich authored a bill essentially overriding a decision to decommission Coast Guard icebreaker Polar Sea, the only remaining heavy icebreaking asset in U.S. inventory. Retaining an asset capable of maintaining surface national presence off the Alaskan North Slope with annual forays to latitude 90 would effectively signal to the world that the U.S. is serious about National Security Presidential Directive 66 – Arctic Region Policy. On the other hand, decommissioning our country’s only heavy icebreaking asset capable of operating in high latitudes signals weakness and lack of commitment to our Arctic responsibilities. The Coast Guard is required to provide statutory services off Barrow regardless of maritime conditions, ice or otherwise. In any climate scenario, the Coast Guard is called upon to operate in the Alaskan Arctic utilizing suitable assets to respond to search and rescue, provide maritime safety and security, conduct fisheries and other law enforcement activities, and to provide a mobile communications platform for emergency coordination.
During a period when other nations, including non-Arctic countries such as China and Korea, are expanding their Arctic resources the decommissioning Polar Sea, absent other U.S. heavy icebreaker assets, is an irrevocable loss of capability from which the U.S. may never recover. As has been demonstrated by the loss of America’s shipbuilding, manufacturing and textile industries, once the skill is lost or outsourced, it is difficult to regain.
Begich should be commended for his vision and strategic thinking to ensure the U.S. maintains viable icebreaking capability. It is not surprising that the strategic vision to maintain our country’s Arctic expertise is championed by someone who lives the reality of the Arctic. In this current climate of economic downturn and diminishing budgets it is easy to lose sight of Arctic needs, especially because the Arctic is so geographically removed from D.C. and fails to deliver measurable enthusiasm to special interest lobbyists. Arctic challenges resulting from climate change will not be solved by resolution but rather by taking active, assertive leadership. The U.S. can take a proactive step forward by retaining and further developing robust icebreaking capabilities, or it can simply stand by and watch it fade away.
• Uchytil is currently the Juneau port director and retired from the Coast Guard after 27 years in May 2011. He served five tours on Coast Guard icebreakers and commanded the icebreaker Polar Sea from 2007-09.

Comments (2)
Add commentPretender so far
We gotta walk the walk not just talk the talk... as a Nation or even the State of Alaska, we aren't even talking the talk...
Let's see: how about a first Alaska Icebreaker built with some of the billions of oil revenue? That can rival the presence that Canada, Russia and the Scandinavian countries have? Just an idea (wild like Alaska itself).
Thanks Carl
Demise of once great American icebreaking fleet...
Sad watching the demise of the once great American icebreaking fleet... I served aboard the last two wind-class breakers... The USCGC Glacier too was retired (a group is trying to save it as a museum.) Polar Sea's sister ship USCGC Polar Star is in inactive status. Perhaps Alaskans should form a group to save the Polar Sea as a museum ship rather than see it towed to the shipbreakers in Asia, like was the fate of the WW II vintage USCGC Westwind.
Hon. Steven W Lindsey
state rep
Keene, NH