The world recognized an international symbol of the hunger for political freedom in the summer of 2009 when a young Iranian woman, Neda Agha-Soltan, was fatally shot during the Tehran uprising. Now, Iran’s persecution of Yousef Nadarkhani, a young pastor sentenced to death for his Christian faith, is a chilling reminder that much of the world also yearns for religious liberty.
Iranian authorities arrested Nadarkhani in his home town of Rasht on Oct. 13, 2009. Nadarkhani, in his early 30s and married with two small children, is the pastor of a house church. His offense? Questioning the Islamic teaching his children received in school and asserting the right of parents to bring up their children in their own religious beliefs.
We know this much from an account by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). Since Nadarkhani’s arrest, though, his alleged crimes have escalated from unlawful protesting to unlawful “apostasy” for converting from Islam to Christianity. The latter judgment was handed down in November 2010 and, after Nadarkhani appealed, reinforced by a recent verdict of the Iranian Supreme Court. In recent days, charges veered wildly from rumors of rape to spying for Israel. Then, the Iranian government denied having charged the pastor at all.
The regime’s increasingly erratic action in the case comes amid international protest at the highest levels. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States is “deeply concerned” about the religious persecution perpetuated by the “hypocritical” Iranian regime and will “continue to call for a government that respects the human rights and freedom of all those living in Iran.” The White House said Nadarkhani “has done nothing more than maintain his devout faith, which is a universal right for all people” and called upon Iranian authorities to release him. Tens of thousands have signed petitions in support of the pastor.
The dramatic international outcry against the looming execution of Nadarkhani is a welcome sign of widespread commitment to religious liberty. But sadly, he is by no means alone in facing religious persecution — whether in Iran or in countries around the globe.
Because these individuals often suffer and die for their faith unknown to the rest of the world, the Iranian regime’s persecution of Nadarkhani is a witness we should heed on their behalf. Worldwide persecution of religious minorities has increased markedly in recent years. Harassment of believers jumped in 23 countries between 2006 and 2009, according to a recent report from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
In two-thirds of the world’s 198 countries, incidents came to light of government or social harassment against Christians in particular. Increasing persecution of Christians in the Middle East, and the resulting exodus of the faithful, has led the Catholic archbishop of Baghdad and other leaders to wonder whether brutal religious oppression could extinguish Christianity in the region altogether.
The Iranian regime seems determined to do just that. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, USCIRF notes, “has called for an end to the development of Christianity in Iran.” An estimated 300,000 of Iran’s 67 million people are Christians, about 10,000 of them Protestants.
Since 1999, Iran has been listed by the U.S. State Department as a country of particular concern because of its disregard for religious freedom. Although the Iranian constitution lists Christianity as a “protected religion” that is due respect, Christians — along with other religious minorities — experience quite the opposite. Religious minorities in Iran report “government imprisonment, harassment, intimidation and discrimination based on their religious beliefs,” according to State’s International Religious Freedom Report, released in September. Since June 2010, “more than 250 Christians have been arbitrarily arrested,” USCIRF adds.
Iran does not recognize the freedom to change religion, despite having assented in 1948 to the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.” Nadarkhani’s conviction for “apostasy” — although unsubstantiated — is a blatant disregard of this universal freedom.
Nor does Iran permit non-Muslims to share their faith with Muslims.
Christian congregations must submit their membership lists to the government. They also must agree not to admit Muslims to their services.
Religious freedom is the birthright of every man and woman. Yet more than 60 years after nations around the world affirmed this truth, too few governments around the world acknowledge it. And far too many people never have enjoyed it.
The outcry on behalf of Yousef Nadarkhani should increase our vigilance on behalf of all those persecuted for their faith.
• Marshall is director of the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation and author of “Now and Not Yet: Making Sense of Single Life in the Twenty-First Century.”




Comments (11)
Add commentThe Heritage Foundation = puke
If you want some amusing reading, visit the Heritage Foundation's website.
It's a gay-hatin', right wing promotin', abstinence only educatin', christianity protectin' uber-conservative think tank...and I use the word 'think' loosely. Very loosely.
And their lead fellow has the amusing last name of "Rector."
I'm surprised that Jesus Christ himself isn't listed as posthumous fellow.
The Amway guys
...beating the drum for war with Iran by stirring up the fundies.
ARTCLE
Some more GARBAGE from the Heritage Foundation!! JM hit the nail on the head with her comment about the Heritage Foundation!
Religious hypocricy at it's best...
...Isn't it amazing that the Heritage Foundation makes such a heartfelt plea about the lack of "Religious Freedom" in another country, while similtaneously seeking to squash Religious Freedoms in ours?
That takes some cajones.
I feel bad for this pastor and his family...
but there is another story here and it's mindboggling to me.
This man of faith is willing to leave his child fatherless rather than say what it takes to get out of that country. It seems to me he puts own pending Christian martrydom (his heavenly reward) above his own child's needs right now.
As someone who is a non-believer, I find this behavior appalling. I'm just not sure if I find the Iranian Judges more appalling.
Mike
Hillary is not a member of the Heritage Foundation
I did not hear any of you say anything negative about Hillary; and she thinks what Iran is doing is wrong also! What are you people's thoughts about what Iran is doing in this case?
What do you think of a law that forbids its citizens from changing religious faiths - with a penalty of death for disobedience? I suspect I would not be surprised at your answers, but I suspect I would be embarrassed by them.
Tit for Tat with Faith
From another angle, all this pastor probably wants to do is preach homophobia, creationism, and so-called hellfire justice for heretics.
All the Iranian theocrats want to do is legally kill apostates by freely practicing their own religion something, ironically, the pastor also wishes to do.
Last week Saudi Arabia lopped off the perfectly good head of a person thought to engage in the make-believe crime of sorcery. Where is the Heritage story about that?
Mike
@hellojuneau1
I don't think anyone posting here disagrees that this is blatant injustice. The problem with the Heritage foundation is that they claim to argue for religious freedom yet seek the ability to discriminate based on religion. They are rampant in their hypocrisy, and look for examples to paint Christians as victims. This story is tragic, yes, but it is a small piece of a much larger problem with religion in general having authority of any kind over people.
afishisborn, good points.
Did you notice the use of the phrase religious freedom is a "birthright"?
If it was a "birthright," there would likely be more freethinkers in the world which is the natural default position of a newborn child.
The fact of the matter is, children typically adopt the faith of their caregivers. There are evolutionary explanations for this. Children obey adults because historically it can save their lives. Religion usurps this sacred trust.
Anyway, it's an indoctrination right, not a birthright, the Foundation seems to be fighting for.
Mike
MikeD is right
Religion is a learned behavior, not an inherent birthright.
And religion is the cause of most of the suffering in this world.
what a crock,the banksters
what a crock,the banksters are covering their tracks and want to take the heat off of them and maybe try the religious war card....