• Overcast, light rain
  • 50°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

My Turn: Forest Service budget just doesn't add up

More money needed to boost fishing, tourism - the real regional money-makers

Posted: December 7, 2011 - 1:00am

As a Sitka-based commercial fisherman, I was excited to see the Alaska Department of Fish and Game confirm what many of us in the fleet suspected: that Southeast Alaska set records this past summer as far as volume, price and returns of salmon. The year 2011 was a blockbuster for commercial salmon fishing in this part of the world and, if anything, the numbers speak volumes for why managing the Tongass National Forest as one of the world’s greatest salmon factories makes good economic sense.

The overall dockside value of all public salmon fisheries in Southeast Alaska totaled $176 million, the highest since Alaska became a state in 1959. Seiners made out particularly well. Southeast Alaska purse seine harvests came in at $112.5 million, the highest since statehood. Gillnet harvests were worth $30.6 million, the second highest since statehood.

As you read Fish and Game’s statistics, the big numbers kept on coming. The 2011 pink salmon return in Southeast was 146 percent higher than the 10-year average, while the chum salmon return was 110 percent higher than the 10-year average. The Southeast Alaska Chinook salmon return neared the 10-year average and the regional sockeye salmon return was 93 percent of the 10-year average.

Southeast was also the state’s most productive region — even more so than Bristol Bay — in terms of number and weight of salmon caught. Southeast fishermen hauled in 73.5 million fish weighing 324.5 million pounds.

What does this mean? It means that what we have in the Tongass National Forest is an amazing wild fishery that employs thousands of people, including me. Although it comprises less than five percent of Alaska’s land mass, the Tongass produces about a third of state’s overall salmon harvest. Our salmon wealth stems from careful management by Fish and Game and great natural conditions, including 17,690 miles of salmon-bearing waters, including rivers, streams, creeks and lakes.

While we’re fortunate here in Southeast Alaska, there’s always room for improvement in how we manage our resources. I’m not going to venture into a tired debate about what we did in the past in the Tongass. But I would like to say that there’s a good opportunity right now to make sure that we do things right for our kids and grandkids so that they can enjoy gangbuster fishing seasons that we just had in Southeast.

As it stands now, the U.S. Forest Service, which manages the Tongass, still puts too much money into its logging and road-building program and shorts the fish-habitat conservation and restoration work that pays dividends as far as salmon and jobs. The Forest Service spends around $25 million annually on timber and road building. This expenditure creates about 130 private-sector jobs and funds the positions of about 160 Forest Service employees. That’s less than one percent of regional employment. By contrast, the Forest Service invests only $1.5 million annually on fisheries, watersheds and salmon-habitat restoration. And yet salmon and trout fisheries pump nearly $1 billion into the regional economy and employ some 7,300 Southeast Alaskans either directly or indirectly, some one in 10 local residents.

Something just doesn’t add up with the Forest Service budget. It’s time for the agency to move the money around and place more dollars into the money-making sector of the Tongass economy — fishing.

The Forest Service has said that it’s moving away from old-growth logging and wants to transition its focus to restoration, second-growth logging, and job-producing industries like fishing and tourism. That’s welcome news. But the agency has said it needs over $100 million to do the watershed restoration that’s needed on the Tongass. Given how tight federal spending is these days, why not shift some of the timber budget over into fishing and restoration? Given the record salmon numbers we had this past summer, and all the jobs those salmon created and the house, boat and credit card payments they covered, I’d say it’s time to rethink the Forest Service budget and put those federal dollars into Southeast Alaska’s real growth industry — salmon fishing.

• Jordan is a commercial fisherman who is based in Sitka.

  • Comment

Comments (16)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
alaskaguy
0
Points
alaskaguy 12/07/11 - 08:04 am
0
0

Shift mining $ also

I agree, and while at it the USFS should quit subsidizing speculative mining operations. Mining employees less that 2% and contributes almost nothing in taxes and royalties while permanently destroying other uses of the forest often left to be cleaned up at tax payer expense. If these out of state companies can make billions of $ on gold, silver and copper, let them go to a desert somewhere and tear it up. Mining is the new clear-cut logging of the 1980's

Latitude58
367
Points
Latitude58 12/07/11 - 10:27 am
0
0

How many of those fish...

...came from hatcheries? I don't argue that the Tongass should be managed with fish habitat in mind, but a lot of the big numbers this writer is citing probably came from hatchery returns of pinks and chums - and those fish never touched a Tongass stream.

skirkz
9
Points
skirkz 12/07/11 - 11:10 am
0
0

Ommited figures.

The author fails to mention the other direct and indirect jobs created by the logging (and mining) industry. Even Forest Service jobs create some other indirect jobs. Fishing isn't the only industry that public lands can sustain. The article suggests that second growth forestry is a positive. But that is only possible when first growth is removed. Sitka spruce aren't exactly annual growers. You can't harvest them the same year you plant them. Not even in twenty years. And once the infrastructure is in place, logging is less detrimental the next time around. Stream buffers can be maintained to protect spawning habitat. Other industries can coexist with fishing. Fishermen aren't the only people who need to survive. Fish consumers have to be able to buy the fish if there is going to be a market to sustain the industry. I bet loggers and miners eat fish while producing wood and metal for boats.

alaskaguy
0
Points
alaskaguy 12/07/11 - 11:22 am
0
0

The Tongass Commercial district

So let's just industrialize the Tongass. The only values in the forest are those that can be bought and sold on the stock exchange. More omitted figures....the economy of conservation organizations; Trout Unlimited, SEACC, Earthjustice, The Clean Water Network... Not to mention tourism, charter hunting and fishing guides, fly fishermen, birders, cavers, photographers, scientists and native cultures that benefit from a non-industrailzed Tongass. It is the last place in the entire worls that contains a healthy sustainable wild fishery! Get your metals and lumber elsewhere.

barnardj1
16
Points
barnardj1 12/07/11 - 11:29 am
0
0

Note to Karl: Look up

Note to Karl: Look up multiple use in the dictionary.

Alaskasalmon
0
Points
Alaskasalmon 12/07/11 - 11:46 am
0
0

Karl's comments are right on.

Karl's comments are right on. The Tongass' highest and best use is for salmon production. And the Forest Service budget should reflect that. Move the millions of dollars spending on timber and road building into watershed restoration and fisheries management. Support our fisheries-based economy! It's all about jobs.

wmolson
187
Points
wmolson 12/07/11 - 12:11 pm
0
0

Just a thought

Several years ago, while doing field work with a forest service archaeologist, we saw some large trees had been cut illegally and the stumps carefully covered over. The archaeologist mentioned what trees like that would bring a person or a company. (Later by the way, the thieves were caught and prosecuted). Then he had a question that has remained with me ever since when I look at a 200-400 year old growth tree and consider its role in the old growth forest ecology, fisheries, tourism and other uses.
His question that still remains is "What is a tree like this truly worth standing in the forest and at the sawmill??"

AH HA
4
Points
AH HA 12/07/11 - 12:30 pm
0
0

Hatchery fish?

Most of those numbers ARE hatchery fish. (first cousin to a farmed fish) and spread disease just as readily as well.

Persnickety Persimmon
299
Points
Persnickety Persimmon 12/07/11 - 01:02 pm
0
0

Hatchery fish live out the

Hatchery fish live out the majority of their lifecycle in the ocean. Farmed fish don't live out any of their lifecycle in the ocean.

First cousin? More like their father's brother's nephew's former roommate.

Odocoileus
0
Points
Odocoileus 12/07/11 - 01:18 pm
0
0

hatchery fish and tongass fish

hatchery fish are less than 25% of the fish that are caught in SE Alaska. The rest are wild fish that come from the Tongass National Forest. The Tongass should be managed for multiple use but the resources the Forest Service invests should go to the things that make the most sense. For the Tongass, the landscape creates the most wealth producing salmon. There is room for logging, but it seems like the Forest Service is just throwing good money after bad trying to keep a timber industry going that just can't compete. Meanwhile, fishermen are investing and adding more value to our salmon resource every year. The Forest Service should follow their lead...

seinerak
4
Points
seinerak 12/07/11 - 03:11 pm
0
0

Pink hatchery fish - that's a new concept

Much of the profit from the 2011 season was from the higher than projected pink run, which are not produced by hatcheries.

Latitude 58 - just where is the pink hatchery located that you refer to?

aktroller
0
Points
aktroller 12/08/11 - 11:23 pm
0
0

wrong thing to do...

This guy makes a great case that the Tongass Forest is exceptional salmon rearing habitat, and it is producing lots of fish. So why put all this money into restoration to fix somthing that isn't broken? Restoration is a hoax floated by the green community, claiming it to be an economy that can replace the timber industry, this is simply not so. For one thing it would be entirely subsidized but, more importantly it is not needed. Save a few isolated areas mother-nature is doing a darn good job of healing the impacts of the past both natural and man-made, with out any outside help. If some of the folks from Juneau and Sitka that are constantly railing against the timber industry would check out southern Southeast, on Prince of Wales Island alone you would find hunderds of good paying timber jobs. You would also find hundereds of fishing jobs and hundereds of visitor industry jobs, and in a few years there will be hunderds of mining jobs. This combined with the other facets of the island economy is a good mix, in fact it's called a diverse economy---

Bernie McKinney
0
Points
Bernie McKinney 12/07/11 - 07:37 pm
0
0

THE TONGASS FOREST

Karl, you are so right! The Tongass and other forests need restoration in a huge way. If you consider that weed seeds are being planted at a rate of 9 to 1 over native plants by birds, wildlife, wind and man then you can envision a future that will behold success for the invasive plants. The Forest Service, private land owners and all public land owners need to realize this and try to turn the tide. We must eliminate all seed sources of those same invasive plants and replace with natives. Check out http://www.seedrain.org

We are trying to do this along the Green River in Washington State. The success is small but growing. http://www.mgrc.org.

skirkz
9
Points
skirkz 12/08/11 - 08:34 am
0
0

Douglas Island Pink And Chum

Douglas Island Pink And Chum - DIPAC... Hatchery in Juneau.
Restore a rainforest. That's funny. If you stand around to long the rainforest will reclaim YOU.

seinerak
4
Points
seinerak 12/08/11 - 01:54 pm
0
0

Douglas Everything but Pinks hatchery would be more accurate

Do you even realize that commercial fishermen and crew pay for the regional aquaculture associations with a percentage taken from their earnings?

SEtroller
8
Points
SEtroller 12/08/11 - 04:52 pm
0
0

why waste money...

Getting back to the point, the restoration buffs need to take a hard look at the Harris River project on Prince of Wales Island. I have not been able to get a hard figure on the cost, but it was huge. I have been around the Harris River for close to 40 years. When I first showed up it was a mess, it has since regenerated substantail pink and chum runs and to a lesser degree coho. The project goal was to create more coho habitat in the system. It was also ment to be the bench-mark for future restoration projects. As a troller I generally wouldn't complain about coho enhancement, if it made since, but the cost of this project was high and the benefit negligible. The other restoration projects in progress or in the planning stage provide even less benefit. This money would be better spent on hatchery expansion, tree thinning or, God forbid, on timber sales or on any of the other productive programs available in the Tongass Forest.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376083/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375478/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376058/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375998/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375678/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/374383/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375278/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376063/
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-523-2295
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING