My Turn: HHS mandate means equal access to health services

Being a big fan of liberty, I read Bishop Edward Burns’ “Defending Religious Liberty” (A Bishop’s Perspective, Sunday, Feb. 5) with interest. Not to my surprise, I found that we have vastly different concepts of liberty and that we disagree on the salient facts regarding the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) decision to require access to standard forms of contraception in employer-provided health plans. You wouldn’t know it from Burns’ piece, but the HHS mandate does not require anyone to purchase or use birth control, rather it merely requires that those who want it have access to it. Nor does the mandate apply, as Bishop Burns contends, to all employers. Churches and other institutions that teach religious doctrine are explicitly exempted.

Framing this as a debate about religious liberty neglects the Catholic Church’s inconvenient truth, namely that birth control is wildly popular in the United States; 99 percent of American women and 98 percent of American Catholic women use birth control. Thus portraying the HHS mandate as an “unconscionable” blow to “the religious liberty of all citizens” only highlights the profound disconnect between the conscience of the church and the consciences of women in this country.

This disconnect is equally evident in Burns’ statement that previously he “could not imagine any decent person” wishing the HHS mandate upon religious institutions. Setting aside the issue of whether or not I am a decent person, I can say that I strongly support the HHS mandate simply because I think women deserve equal treatment with men. As well, it wouldn’t have taken a great deal of imagination to see this day coming given the fact that 28 states already require contraceptive coverage in health plans and 8 of those states, like the HHS mandate, allow for only narrow religious exemptions.

In addition, numerous Catholic institutions already offer contraceptive coverage for their female employees and have for years. This includes Catholic universities like Georgetown and Seattle University and health care providers like Catholic Healthcare West, which runs 40 Catholic hospitals in the western US. Where is the outcry against these Catholic institutions that have been willingly “violating their own consciences?” I guess the headline “Georgetown University compelled by federal government to offer employee health benefits it already offers” just isn’t that catchy. The simpler answer is that there are a lot of good reasons for Catholic schools and hospitals to offer contraception as part of their health care packages, such as the fact that many of the people they employ are not Catholic. Even more fundamentally, civil rights law and common sense both tell us that selectively removing preventative care and prescription items that apply only to women from employer health plans is blatantly discriminatory.

Some have predicted that the HHS mandate will rally people to rise up and reclaim their religious liberty. Personally I don’t see it. Where are hoards of women, Catholic and otherwise, demanding that their religious rights be restored by making them pay more out of pocket for their birth control? The only people I really hear complaining about this decision are Catholic bishops. How many of them are women so that the HHS mandate even impacts them in any material way?

I would never advocate for treating people of faith as “second class citizens,” however the Church’s insistence on trying to treat women as second class citizens is both misguided and out of touch. Winning the right for a handful of Catholic schools and hospitals to exclude contraceptives from their female employees’ health insurance coverage will do nothing to change the fact that nearly all women of child bearing age in this country use birth control. The church would be better served to keep itself relevant by not pretending that we live in a time when women can be told they can’t use birth control.

In closing, I took a poll in my household and 1 of 1 women surveyed disagreed with Bishop Burns’ contention that using contraceptives to prevent pregnancy is “as if having a child were a disease.” Rather, the prevailing sentiment was that ensuring fair access to affordable contraception enables people to better chose when they are going to have children, which increases the chances that those children will be born into stable, healthy, and loving environments.

• Hood lives in Juneau with his wife and three daughters.


Thu, 01/19/2017 - 09:41

Letter: A pro-life presidency is something to be thankful for

​On Jan. 20, we will see the inauguration of a new president. From the pro-life perspective, this is something to be thankful for. That day represents the departure from the White House of one of the most pro-abortion presidents we have seen to date. His replacement is a man who has voiced support for a number of pro-life, pro-family initiatives that will protect the rights of the unborn and their mothers. Read more

Thu, 01/19/2017 - 09:22

My Turn: Alaska’s national parks need infrastructure support

In 2016, the National Park Service celebrated its centennial anniversary. 2017 marks the 100th anniversary of Denali National Park, one of the many crown jewels in Alaska’s collection of our national parks. These parks represent the very best and most treasured public lands in our country. As we hear about badly needed infrastructure improvements to our roads, bridges and utilities nationwide, it’s important to remember that our national parks are not immune to these challenges. Denali National Park alone faces an infrastructure repair backlog to roads and facilities of $53 million.

Read more
Thu, 01/19/2017 - 09:22

My Turn: Reflecting on why I love Alaska

Gov. Bill Walker issued a proclamation designating 2017 as a “Year of History and Heritage” in recognition of Alaska’s sesquicentennial — the 150th year since Russia ceded its possessions and interests in Alaska to the United States. Gov. Walker’s proclamation encourages all Alaskans “to study, teach, reflect upon our past, and apply its lessons to a brighter, more inclusive future.”

Read more
Thu, 01/19/2017 - 08:47

Outside Editorial: NATO and the EU: Mend them, don’t end them

The following editorial first appeared in the Chicago Tribune:

In lamenting President Barack Obama's foreign and military policies, Republicans have frequently offered a concise summary: "Our allies don't trust us, and our enemies don't fear us." They didn't imagine the day would come when the same might be said of a Republican president. But that's the prospect Donald Trump raises. Read more


  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback