Last fall, the state of Alaska and the City and Borough of Juneau seemed to be well on the way to making a much-needed new state office building a reality.
Two million dollars was spent on design work. There was a long process that narrowed potential sites down to two — one downtown or one in Mendenhall Valley. Then, all of the sudden, the process screeched to a halt last October with a simple announcement by the Department of Administration.
That planned structure would have housed Department of Fish & Game workers now located in a building on Douglas in need of major work, Department of Public Safety employees in a building acknowledged — last October — by Department of Administration Commissioner Becky Hultberg to be at the end of its useful life, and Department of Labor & Workforce Development staffers currently in the Plywood Palace.
The announcement that hit the pause button on a new state office building explained the Douglas ADF&G building and the Labor building on Eighth and Egan would be renovated, the latter work being negotiated as part of an extended lease on the Plywood Palace.
Well, as we recently learned, so much for that. The state announced plans to find new housing for Labor Department workers instead of renewing its lease on a building acknowledged by its owners to need $2.5 million of renovations, and was reported to be in such poor condition as to cause health problems for people employed there. Why the state decided trying to shore up dilapidated buildings and run the risk of turning them into money pits, instead of moving forward with a much-needed and already-planned-for new building escapes us.
But, at least part of the Department of Administration’s decision could be rationalized. The DOA speculated Department of Public Safety employees could be moved to the current State Office Building once the State Library left its current home there and moved to the in-the-works State Library, Archives and Museum, or SLAM, building. Except funding for that structure seems to be coming in drips and drops. SLAM is expected to cost Alaska $128.5 million — in today’s dollars — yet no one knows where $74.5 million of those costs will come from. And that $74.5 million figure only holds up if a proposed $20 million appropriation asked for by Gov. Sean Parnell comes through this legislative session.
It’s a funding dilemma that prompted Anchorage Democratic Sen. Johnny Ellis to ask, “Why aren’t we doing this in one fell swoop at a time we have the cash money?”
That, senator, is a great question, and one we’d like to see answered — hopefully before your fellow legislators conclude business this April (or May, or whenever). While you and your colleagues are at it, we’d also like to find out when the state will commit to funding and building a sorely-needed office building here in the capital city. We understand the state’s hesitancy to simply approve each and every project it is presented simply because the money is there, but new offices in Juneau are a need, not a want, and it’s better to satisfy this need now, when the resources are available to do so.
• Editor's note: A byline has been added to this editorial to clarify it is an Empire editorial.





Comments (19)
Add commentWho wrote this?
Um, who is the author please?
I agree. If the state needs more office buildings, we need to build them instead of lease them. Building saves money in the future. I was shocked to discover recently just how many offices we lease in Juneau instead of owning outright.
Also, every state office building we build in Juneau further anchors our fair city as the state's capital.
There, you went and said it, Jo.
"Also, every state office building we build in Juneau further anchors our fair city as the state's capital."
And THAT is what Sean Parnell is trying to avoid. Kick the can down the road long enough until it's a true crisis, then one of his cronies in Anchorage miraculously appears with 'just the perfect building' that he'll rent or sell for a song.
He, of course, has plenty of allies in the legislature with this same agenda. It's all about sucking power back to Anchorage.
Because we KNOW that no
Because we KNOW that no legislators could possibly have any crony buddies with vacant office space in ANC.....
My estimation exactly.
Why build when we're only passing through? The state is all too happy to let CBJ build a new Capitol on Telephone Hill. That would be easy enough to walk away from. We've already built their parking garage. That's why it was designed to be added onto on top (bet a lot of you didn't know that). As Lat pointed out, the deteriorating office space in Juneau facilitates the capital move agenda. The only way Juneau will get a new SOB is to have a Southeast Alaskan Governor.
Southeast Alaska Governor? Yeah, right...
Juneau does a great job alienating people who are forced to go there because they were elected to represent a majority of Alaskans who have never been to Juneau and will never go there on general principles. No road, bad attitudes and entitlement mentality don't endear Alaskans to Juneau or her politicians.
Can't argue with that, akdonn.
Just sain'.
Use POMS Donn? How about your LIO? Ever visit during interim?
Donn I strongly doubt that you or many who complain about access to their representation use the tools during session that are available to them. Not to mention that if you think being in Juneau guarantees access to lawmakers, you are sadly mistaken. Do you visit your rep. during interim at their office? Do you use the POMS system? Do you need to use the LIO's?
Many Alaskans have never been to Nome or Barrow either and will never go there on general principles. I could say the same for Anchorage, except I love all of Alaska. Unlike yourself.
What about the tax revenue?
Just asking. I guess I've always wondered what the advantage is for the State/CBJ to own its own buildings. I guess either way it works out the same. Private owner pays taxes, but they get the taxes from the State/CBJ through their rent. The rent money comes from the taxpayers. Now if the State owns the buildings they are tax exempt. How does the CBJ benefit from this? Does the State pay the city a stipend?
Is there an advantage to having private buildings sitting around vacant and making the city look like every other downtown in America?
Hello, Rent.
CBJ Collects full rent. I think it juuuuust may generate more revenue than taxes....Sheesh. Economics 101.
Southeast Governor
Beth Kerttula!!!
It takes no genius to know
Juneau needs adequate office space (emphasis on adequate). It takes no genius to know that Juneau needs at LEAST another office building, if not two. The SLAM is and will be built.
I agree with other posters here who contend that it is the Juneau as the red-headed-step-child syndrome, and buying into that cr*p, which causes some of our elected politicians to deep-six various proposals that are in Juneau's best interest. Any of these are shooting themselves (and Alaska) in their own foot, as the capital of the largest, richest and most beautiful state in the union should be properly presented as a showpiece to Alaskans, Americans and visitors from abroad. The largest building in Juneau (12 storeys - the Mendenhall "Towers" - yeah right) was built in 1954, and is in need of demolition! I rest my case. If the clowns won't stand up for their capital, then no Juneauite should vote for them, and should tell their friends what twits these twits are.
Hey! Let's use that vacant
Hey! Let's use that vacant jail they just spent how much money on for a new Capitol and office building. They go in for session and don't get let out until they accomplish something we all agree is productive. I'd vote to send the Capitol that way if they could actually come up with a real reason. And 'because its out of the way' doesn't fly.
Helloooo
"CBJ Collects full rent. I think it juuuuust may generate more revenue than taxes....Sheesh. Economics 101."
I am talking about a new STATE office building. If the State OWNS the building and the land then CBJ will not collect rent? And, the STATE will be tax exempt. My question then is, "does the CBJ get anything out of this with regard to revenue?"
@Jo
Empire editorials reflect the views of the Empire's editorial board. I'll adjust the headline to make it more clear the piece is an Empire editorial.
Hellloooo landlord much?
Perhaps if our city had the forward vision required, they would build CBJ buildings to rent to the SOA DOL. Shy of that I fail to see how the CBJ tax revenues are of any concern to the SOA.
The SOA has an obligation to house it's employees in buildings that are up to code. Not guarantee CBJ income.
The city gives too much to the state.
Buy a building and let the state have it for a dollar? That's right. The Masonic lodge that now has a sky bridge to the Capitol. Thanks, CBJ, for giving away my tax dollars. I would like to vote on things like that. What good did it do? None. The state is further away from retaining Juneau as the capital than it was then.
Um, it created much needed
Um, it created much needed office space the legislation affairs needed. It accomplished exactly what was intended. Oh, and fixing up a building falling apart.