By virtue of my state job, I am a member of the AFSME union, a part of the AFL-CIO. My union was the first to endorse Barack Obama for the presidency in the 2008 election. We endorsed him again in December. The news release reads in part:
“President Obama is the only choice for the 99 percent. We must put people back to work, make the 1 percent pay their fair share, and protect Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. President Obama will stand up for working families,” said AFSCME Pres. Gerald W. McEntee.
Nowhere in the release was any mention of the Afghanistan war. When Obama ordered the troop surge in 2009, he made the Afghanistan War his war.
Although soldiers are largely from the working families the union claims to represent, when our individual membership was massed into a single political body, the 99 percent become the 1 percent. We’re only in it for our own economic well-being.
This is nothing new for my union. Dick Meister, former labor editor for the San Francisco Chronicle, reminded us that the AFL-CIO was a major supporter of the Vietnam War. In his Feb. 2 blog, Meister recalled that at its 1969 convention, the AFL-CIO unconditionally supported the Vietnam War and the Vietnam policies of then-President Nixon. The measure was opposed by only six of the 700 delegates — including Art Carter, who offered a substitute resolution that urged the AFL-CIO to “to exercise all possible influence and persuasion on the national administration to effect an immediate major reduction of American military involvement in Vietnam and to bring the Vietnam War to a speedy end. “ He was booed off the stage as a “young punk” by the union faithful.
The Republican presidential candidates — except Ron Paul — all call for even more military and war. But the Republican candidate was not our only other choice. My union could have endorsed a third-party candidate, or nobody at all. At minimum, the endorsement of Obama could have come with resolutions to end the war and take care of our returning veterans.
According to NPR’s Tom Ashbrook, Congress recently passed legislation to qualify soldiers with diagnosed PTSD to a medical retirement. Soon after, President Obama’s military ordered reexamination of the 76,000 soldiers they’d already diagnosed with PTSD. They re-diagnosed 40 percent of those soldiers with other ailments that could take away the military retirement. Some were even sent back to war. Not surprisingly, this was after a federal ombudsman said that each PTSD case could cost $1.5 million in treatment over the lifetime of that soldier. Our government spends billions on cruise missiles and fighter jets. Yet we quibble about the costs of treatment for our soldiers.
All presidential candidates talk about spending. But while they debate tax fairness, they talk little about how taxes are spent. We now spend 39 cents of every income tax dollar on the wars, according to the Friends Committee on National Legislation. Obama has had the highest military budget in our nation’s history.
Although Sen. Mark Begich indicated in February he believes Obama will withdraw troops from Afghanistan by 2014 or sooner, former Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eichenbery painted a very different picture on the World Affairs Council radio show just last week on KTOO. He repeatedly stressed that the U.S. is not withdrawing from Afghanistan, we are “transitioning”. He made it clear that we may not leave there in 2014 if Afghanistan is not ready. With the increased violence there — much of it due to our presence — withdrawal may be a long, long way off.
A third of Juneau’s homeless are veterans. Many here and across the country cannot advocate for themselves due to their condition. My union does not advocate, as a political group, for taking care of our returning Iraq and Afghanistan vets or ending the war.
Will we allow our union’s carte blanche endorsement of Obama and his foreign policy to speak for us, or will we call upon our union leaders, our congressional delegation, and our president to care of our vets, remove our troops from Afghanistan, and end funding of war with our grandchildren’s taxes?
• Stopha is a Douglas resident.





Comments (44)
Add commentIvmykyk
Thanks for clearing the air here!
Just to clear the air.
Unions are not my favorite beast. Today's Unions have become too political. It seems to be unavoidable, though, when dealing with political bosses over the long haul. Yes, the work environmental safety record sometimes make the Unions a bit obsolete because the Feds have come to terms with safety work hazards and hours worked/paid. Our children are no longer working in sweatshops. But Unions are are hard to separate from Corporations today only because power tends to corrupt. Lay down with dogs and one wakes with fleas, so they they say. Lay down in compliance and one awakens with the corporate bylaws. I have yet read a script from anyone here with the knowledge of how Unions work. Your bad.
@ swimmergirl
Do we all vote for what?
The executive boards essentially set policies and manage expenditures for regional and statewide events, etc...
Do not let your executive board (whether it be regional or statewide) make the decision without your input though.
You elected the board, they work for you.
Each region has monthly board meetings and general membership meetings. The boards always sets aside time for member comments and the members essentially run the general membership meetings.
I encourage you to get involved and let your voice be heard.
thanks, bean....
that's what I was looking for, I'm not in the writers union, but worth finding out how my own handles these things.
Ken, what I meant was - just "being aware of the policies" of an institution doesn't change them, particularly if that institution is a membership one, and you are on the outside. The writer is clearly on the inside. Since it is a membership institution, with voting and member comments - the way to effect a change in policy of that institution is to work on it from the inside - get elected, get involved, educate the membership, change the policy......correct?
(and wear a flea collar......)
@ ken dookie
Well, if you're that afraid of some goat herding Taliban half a planet away in some third world country, then I encourage you to hide under your bed, sleep with your guns, suck on a binkee or anything else that makes you feel safer from them.
Me, I'd rather just bring our troops home, away from them and their goats, but then I understand that would make people like you feel less safe.
Or, could all this just be a subterfuge to keep our troops over there so that Halliburton can rake in billions of dollars housing and feeding our troops?
FEAR NO GOATS!
swimmergirl
Excellent point!
Jo
You bet I fear the goat herding Taliban. He/she is not a half world away, and I am not hiding. Actually I am a pretty big target.
P.S.: As I have stated earlier...bring our troops home. They are not going to make any difference in the next 9/11.
@swimmergirl
That is exactly right!
The first step is to vote out the good ol' boys and get fresh ideas and philosophies represented on the Executive Boards...change starts at the top.
Republicans are union buster!
Republicans are union buster! An independent candidate is not a realistic choice. Republicans have and continue to vote to remove discriminatory practice protections for women and minorities in the work place. In 2010 Republicans blocked a bill to end tax deduction for companies that move over sees, the bill would have given US employers a 2 year tax break on payroll taxes for every new US hire that replaced an oversees employee businesses would have been blocked from taking any deduction, loss or credit for costs related to reducing or ending U.S. operations while expanding similar operations outside of the US. As far as the military goes many companies who supply the military are union. The military itself should be unionized they are under paid and underserved and republicans love to vote for cutting military health care, education benefits and housing assistance for veterans. Yes unions hurt business, when all of your employees stand together and say you will give us safe working conditions, if you want my labor you will have to pay a reasonable price for it with health care benefits, you will not pay women less, you will pay overtime, and you will treat all your employees with respect. If republicans and Business had their choice you would not be able to bargain for your wage, you would not get any overtime compensation and you would be lucky to make minimum wage. A retirement package only if the company had some kind of tax benefit to give it to you if the union was to endorse any republican that would be irresponsible