Con: Democrats had no choice but to act; the erred by not passing a single-payer plan

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Barney Frank has been right on many things during his 32 years as a champion of the underdog in the House of Representatives, but he was dead wrong when he recently remarked that Democrats acted precipitously by rushing healthcare reform into law at the start of President Barack Obama’s first term.

The remark has angered many congressional Democrats, some of whom wasted no time in suggesting that Frank’s gargantuan-sized ego had been bruised by the fact that his party sidetracked his sweeping financial services reform bill to pass the unwieldy and widely unpopular ObamaCare.

Unfortunately, Frank, who is retiring at the end of the year, fails to recognize the realities facing his party at the start of 2009. With dominant majorities on Capitol Hill and a promising new president in the White House, the Democrats had little choice but to “seize the day” and pass the bill that would become the signature legislative achievement of Obama’s first-term.

In doing so, however, their Congressional leaders lost their nerve — failing to realize they and they alone held the upper hand. Instead of passing a simple and straight forward single-payer healthcare law, they decided to further load the deck by offering juicy incentives to Big Pharma and Big Insurance in the form of an additional 19 million new customers.

As a result, they produced a dysfunctional bill of more 2,700 pages weighed down with hundreds of often conflicting requirements — a veritable “dungeons and dragons” labyrinth where untold dangers lurked behind every turn.

Passage of a single-payer — already working well in Canada, across much of Europe and in most other advanced countries — finally would have brought 21st century medical care to the United States. That would have eliminated the costly tons of paperwork and volumes of confusing rules that now befuddle — and all too often — bankrupt Americans in need of quality care delivered in plain Anglo-Saxon English.

Sadly, then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., simply lost their nerve and ignored the advice of such experienced legislators as Reps. John Dingell, D-Mich., and Jim McDermott, D-Wash., — trading principle and practicality for the prospect of campaign contributions from the likes of Pfizer, Humana, Cigna and United Health Care.

Democrats as a whole would have been better off, if they had taken the advice of legendary Tammany Hall boss George Washington Plunkitt, and indulged in a little honest graft, once described by Plunkitt as pursuing “the interests of one’s party, one’s state, and one’s personal interests all together.”

Still, Barney Frank is blatantly wrong in his assertion that the Democrats should have waited before passing a major health care reform package. Such legislation was vitally needed at a time when many millions of Americans were without health coverage and many millions more drastically under covered and vulnerable to continual rounds of soaring costs.

Ironically, the Supreme Court likely would do Democrats a favor at the polls in November, if — as expected — they strike down the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, thus pulling the bottom card from Reid and Pelosi’s hastily constructed “house of cards.”

If that happens, the progressive forces that now constitute a majority of Democratic congressional candidates could seize the day and run on a platform making “single-payer healthcare legislation” their top priority.

Such a move would instantly undermine the fear mongering by “know-nothing” Tea Partiers and could well attract more than a modicum of support from independents, moderate Republicans and even some traditional conservatives, who would like to get the contentious issue off the table and move on with more pressing issues.

In many respects, passing a reasonable “simple-payer” bill could be the one action that revives bipartisan civility and helps restore the U.S. to its traditional role as world leader.

• Madsen is a contributing writer to the Online Journal and an author of several books with a progressive perspective.

More

Wed, 02/22/2017 - 11:53

Stand with Alaskans and stand with Planned Parenthood

I appreciate Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s recent decision to support repealing the Trump administration’s global gag rule. The global gag rule bans federal money for overseas family planning programs if the programs also provide abortion, or provide information about abortion. The global gag rule puts thousands of lives at risk, and Murkowski has rightly recognized that. I praise Murkowski, and want her to know that Alaskans stand with her in supporting access to family planning services. This means that we support Planned Parenthood, and we hope she will stand with us in the coming weeks by refusing to vote for any changes to the Affordable Care Act that include defunding Planned Parenthood. Read more

Alaska editorial: The opioid issue

This editorial first appeared in the Ketchikan Daily News:

Read more

Expanding apprenticeship in rural Alaska

We are proud to announce a new statewide training initiative: the Alaska Maritime Apprenticeship Program. Over the past year, the Calista Corporation, in partnership with the state and federal government, has built a Registered Apprenticeship program to train Alaskans for careers on deck, in the engine room, and in the galley, earning both a salary and an industry-recognized credential. Working with a group of companies including Brice Marine and Yukon River Towing, we are expanding career and training opportunities for Alaskans in the maritime industry.

Read more

Transboundary mining: Defending Alaska’s interests

It is a big week for Alaska’s capital city. Senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan are in town to address the Alaska State Legislature, the United Fishermen of Alaska (UFA) Board of Directors, and all Alaskans. There are a number of issues on which the state of Alaska, including our elected decision makers at both the state and federal levels, can show unity. One of those critical issues is asking the U.S. federal government to defend Alaskan interests in the Alaska-British Columbia (B.C.) transboundary mining issue.

Read more

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING