Spurred by the work of the AJ Mine Advisory Committee, the City and Borough of Juneau has been investigating Juneau’s water supply and infrastructure needs. Recently, City Engineer Rorie Watt gave the Chamber of Commerce a preliminary review of water supply alternatives. In an April 30 Juneau Empire article, “City engineer praises Juneau’s water,” Watt said Juneau’s water is abundant and “the best of the best in terms of quality.” He also tied in the need for infrastructure planning for the future, which then led back to the possibility of opening the AJ Mine. He is not alone in doing this. After all, it is the thinking about the possibility of opening the mine that got us started in investigating our future water needs and supply. It’s pretty understandable to see how good news about our water situation can circle back around to good news regarding the AJ Mine.
But I need to throw some water (pun intended) on this connection. I would like to remind pro-mine advocates it was determined, regardless of whether the AJ Mine opens, the city needed to be planning for our future water needs. As the news comes in about the abundance and quality of our water, let’s remember that word “regardless” and treat the AJ Mine decision as a separate process. While addressing our public water supply was a priority concern of the committee, it was not the only one. There are 13 other recommendations advanced by the AJ Mine Advisory Committee. And most importantly, because of its congested downtown location, there is still a significant divide in the community regarding the AJ Mine. Many residents remain skeptical a mine could be designed and operated without putting community assets like tourism at risk. Let’s keep in mind opening up the AJ Mine is not the same as supporting a mine in the hinterlands.
But getting back to the good news about our water, we should be thinking about our high quality drinking water as the new oil. As I previously mentioned in a column, by 2040 the United Nations estimates demand for freshwater will outstrip supply by more than 30 percent as global water consumption is doubling every 20 years. Looking at the 4 billion, low-income consumers in the world, the World Bank estimates the total market for drinking water in countries throughout Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and Latin America is $20 billion. Already, oil tankers are being re-lined to carry water to these water challenged areas. Could some of Juneau’s plentiful, high quality water be used for these global markets?
According to Watt, we’re already pumping 20 percent of our summer water supply to cruise ships. How much more would they want? Ten or 20 years from now, what would the cruise ships pay for our water? Perhaps this would be a better outlet for our water than the AJ Mine? The late Gov. Wally Hickel once dreamed of a water pipeline to California. While some see plentiful water options and jump to the AJ Mine, I see a whole new industry for Juneau — water export. Maybe it’s time to think outside the mine.
• Troll is a long-time Alaskan with more than 22 years of experience in fisheries, coastal policy and energy policy. She resides in Douglas.





Comments (5)
Add commentInteresting article, Kate
I think you can put me in the 'guardedly pro-mine' camp.
IF, and that's a big IF, we can develop the AJ without unacceptable impacts on Juneau, the revenue from that mine could assure Juneau's prosperity into the indefinite future. How many other cities own their own gold mine?
It's a resource we would be irresponsible to ignore. It could reduce tax burdens on Juneauites and fund needed investments. It could be a hedge against a capitol move. The real discussion we should be having regarding the mine is what the City would do with the revenue. If we're going to just give it to politicians to go blow in Vegas...why bother?
Agree on the need to consider our water supply separately from the mine. As far as exporting water, why can't we do both? Have the mine AND export water, if it ever comes to that. Sitka's already set up to export water, with a pipeline to a port facility.
The water export market hasn't arrived yet, and who knows if it ever will. But in an ideal world, we'd wean ourselves off of oil and convert those existing oil tank facilities to water storage facilities for loading into barges. Maybe we could use our gold revenue to facilitate that conversion in our economy.
No practical global market
In addition to having inadequate collection and storage facilities, we're too removed from dry areas to be selling our water elsewhere. A Turkish/Israeli study recently determined that shipping water between their two countries would be double the price of desalination. Selling to the cruise lines looks like our only option. However if no further water resources are developed, growing community demands may restrict this option. Eventually, CBJ should meter water customers to encourage thoughtful use.
Ms troll is still under the bridge...
She needs to come out and have a look around.... This scheme was tried in Sitka and is now bankrupt. True Alaska Bottling plant never exported even one gallon of water. They found that even at one Penney a gallon they were unable to create a market for a nine billion gallon a year dedicated supply. As of 2006 Singapore was desalinating water for $0.49 per cubic meter and In Israel as of 2005 desalinating water cost $0.53 per cubic meter. Since a cubic meter is about 264 gallons of water a little simple math will tell you that their cost per gallon is $0.002007575 in Israel and $0.0018560606 in Singapore.
There is no viable market for water at more than double the cost of desalinization. Currently every country in the Middle East that has salt-water access is supplying their people with water from desalinization plants that are quite numerous in the area. If shipping water in was cheaper, it seems certain that this would already be happening.
history repeats, Kate
"...by 2040 the United Nations estimates demand for freshwater will outstrip supply by more than 30 percent as global water consumption is doubling every 20 years."
My 85-year-old father read this, chuckled, and asked me to comment for him.
When he was a young journalist in 1958, he wrote a series of award-winning articles on the perceived world shortage of fresh water. The statistics of 54 years ago predicted we would run out of fresh water in less than 20 years....
Making inferences to 'troll' and 'bridges',
repeatedly, takes me back to the grade-school playground where the bully is trying to get some chuckles from his/her peers at someone else's expense. Your contributions have merit...why sully them with such cheap shots?