In the May 23 edition of the New York Times there is an article about unchecked rape and domestic violence against Native American women. It highlights the staggering number of unprosecuted rapes in Emmonak, Alaska. There is no recourse for these women: no effective law enforcement, no prosecutions, no penalties. Rapists get a free ride.
Despite the new programs and publicity about these issues, what measurable progress has been made in the past few years? Alaska still has the worse rate of rape, domestic violence and all forms of sexual assault of any state in the nation. Nothing changes. The “Choose Respect” campaign is as much of a joke as Nancy Reagan’s “Just say no” plan for reducing drug abuse.
Why doesn’t funding for increased law enforcement, prosecution of offenders and prevention programs get off the “we don’t really care that much” legislative priority funding list? And the governor? He says he is against domestic violence so why can’t he put his money where his mouth is? How about analyzing each area of need, Gov. Sean Parnell, and then supporting full funding and programs for each?
And how should money be spent? Well, first to law enforcement so that women in the villages are protected from repeated rapes and retaliation; their rapists and abusers prosecuted. It is not easy to get good law enforcement in the villages. In 1981, I flew to Emmonak with a state trooper/pilot who made a terrific but what seemed a futile effort to train the village’s slovenly and uninterested VPSO on law enforcement procedures. As evidenced by the New York Times article, in 30 years, nothing has changed. Village enforcement officers need better oversight, training and follow-up. That means more state troopers to do that.
We also need dedicated prosecutors who only handle crimes against women and who receive training to understand how victims react, the psychological impact, the skepticism of some jury members and most of all, public apathy. A few years ago, I sat on a jury where the defendant was accused of raping two underage girls, in foster care. There was no expert to explain why the young women reacted to their assaults they way they did. It seemed to me that the prosecutor didn’t know how to present his case and after we were secluded for deliberations, many jury members had difficulty understanding the indictments and some male jurors automatically assumed the girls were lying. Only me and another juror were holdouts, otherwise the defendant would have been completely exonerated. Those young women were wronged by the criminal justice system. They are not alone.
Does anyone notice the absence of prosecutions (at least in the news) for crimes against women? Does anyone really care or are we all so inured to the daily recitation of these crimes in the Empire that they no longer produce any reaction but a shrug?
That brings me to the victims. Most Fridays I cook dinner for the residents at the AWARE shelter as a volunteer. Last week there were nearly 40 women and children crowding in there for safety. The shelter isn’t a large place, when it is full, several people sleep in the same room. The facility is old and in need of repair. It houses victims of rape and domestic violence from several other towns and villages that don’t have shelters. They arrive with little or nothing in terms of money or possessions; most do not have jobs or a place to live. They suffer physically and emotionally and, of course, so do their children. The shelter needs money and its residents need homes, jobs, safety, justice and most of all your support.
As Juneauites you are known as being intelligent, well educated and well intentioned. We can work to change this state’s dismal domestic violence and rape statistics. All of us can speak up and write our lawmakers. Each one of us can donate money and time. Domestic violence and rape in Alaska is disgrace that sullies all of us. We must work relentlessly together at all levels, within our neighborhoods, our communities and our government to face this challenge and conquer it. It can’t be done without you. What will you do?
By the way, in a follow-up article May 24, the New York Times stated that the Emmonak Women’s shelter was closing due to lack of funds.
• Judson is a Juneau resident who moved to Alaska in 1955, was an employee of Public Safety during that visit to Emmonak and volunteers at the AWARE shelter.





Comments (7)
Add commentThanks Patty
For confirming my suspicions that Sean Parnell's 'Choose Respect' program is simply a cynical political ploy intended to paint him as caring about women and the vulnerable. This campaign was probably cooked up for him by Karl Rove.
At the same time he starves the programs that will actually address the problems, he advocates for massive tax cuts to oil companies, which will even further reduce funding available for these programs.
We need a new governor, with new priorities.
Certainly not condoning
Certainly not condoning anything, but in the defense of the law enforcement in these villages, they are underfunded, undertrained, and all alone. A friend of mine was one of them. If he busted someone for drunk and disorderly, the next day he was a complete outcast. He had constant threats of violence against him and his family. Even the complainants were upset because he arrested "Uncle George" even though it was to protect them. The local grocery store would refuse to sell him food, etc. It sounds simple to just have the VPSO lock up the bad guy, but it really isnt so cut and dried. Unfortunately, he had married a villager as ell, so even when he came home, he got it there as well. I have the highest regard for VPSO's as they deal with this day in/ day out seven days a week. They have no day off, or quitting time. If they do their job, they are the jack booted thug picking on poor Uncle George. If they don't, they are the "village’s slovenly and uninterested VPSO" No one should have to tolerate abuse, even VPSO's.
kpawsuh
Forty six years ago, I was the field supervisor for the training program for VISTA (volunteers in service to America, the 'domestic peace corps') at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The trainees spent two weeks, as one or two trainees in a village, and then returned to Fairbanks. Their most common comment about their first village experience in Alaska was "Its like living in a big goldfish bowl !" Most volunteers survived a year or two in a village and returned to their world.
As urban Americans, it was a whole new world for them. I think, and it is just my opinion, that many urban residents in Alaska today have no idea of what life in village Alaska is like.
I read comments such as "They choose to live out there and want everyone else to support them." When in fact, many or most of the village residents are descendants of people who lived in the area for many generations. Most Alaskan Natives in the pre-contact days, moved throughout their territories.
Villages were established for the benefit of the teachers, missionaries and government officials, but today have no economic base for their existence. People don't "choose," to live there; it is the only place they have ever lived, and many don't have the education nor skills to survive in an urban area. Many try urban life, and return to the village they came from because they did not have what it takes to survive in an urban way of life.
Alaskans, especially urban Alaskans, have to understand how villages came to be, what their languages, traditions and culture has been, how it has changed, the many frustrations and anger that builds up among folks knowing that they can't really share in the life of urban Alaska and the rest of the country. It is not something they "choose" it is the only place they feel they can survive even with all the problems.
I think one of the best educational programs we have in Alaska is where students from urban centers spend a short time in rural villages, and rural village students spend time in an urban area. They learn and experience what life is really like across our state.
WMolson..........What I do understand..........
I understand the cultural genus of village life. I do understand that most villagers do not feel they have choice in where they live due to various and sundry limitations and barriers. I do understand that things are the way they are for many reasons beyond village resident control. HOWEVER... domestic violence, sexual assault, and other crimes are NOT acceptable consequences for any reason;cultural, educational, socioeconomic, etc. These CHOICES to behave in maladaptive ways defy civilized law. These CHOICES conflict with the culturally accepted norms of behavior for indigenous people of Alaska. These CHOICES are unacceptable under any circumstance.
It is difficult to fathom someone from an isolated village being successful in an urban community for sure, when generations of relatives link those people to the community. It is unconscienable that these good, decent people must accept being victimized as a consequence of where they live. Since these villages are part of the state, it IS incumbent upon our government to provide a measure of safety to these isolated residents equal to the measure of safety any resident of an urban community would be afforded. Failing that provision is failing a people who do depend on outside interventions for many resources including public safety.
We do have to acknowledge that some ways of life have to be altered. Outside intervention from public entities to assure safety and provision of resources are concessions of contemporary society that ARE well accepted in small villages. Just as these residents have practically mastered job sharing, public entitlements, unemployment insurance, and accessing resources outside of subsistence and survival methodologies, so too should we understand that with proper provision of public safety staffing, these residents would embrace and master a safer way of life. Those who would issue threats of retaliation against local VPSO or Trooper staffing should be incarcerated or better yet, placed in front of a tribal court to be isolated away from the community as punishment. I have seen this in southeast communities be a highly successful and culturally respectful disciplinary action.
The villages are a different
The villages are a different world for sure. They have many many challenges facing them. The dry ones fare better for sure, but then they just have a underground black market that really isnt even that underground. Everyone knows who is doing what. It is sad that there is the level of abuse that there is. Law enforcement isnt going to fix this though unless it is done in a big big way.You could easily be arresting a quarter of the village in some cases. There has to be a meaningful shift from the inside. We can try to "save" the villages all we want, but they have to want to be saved and save themselves.
"or better yet, placed in front of a tribal court."
I would like to hear more how tribal courts have addressed these village issues.
Choose Respect
is just lip service. Easy to say without making a commitment to end violence against women in any meaningful way. Just ...'choose respect?'
How will this help a young woman who's uncle is drunk and looking to use her for his entertainment? Or worse ...feeding her alcohol so he can later blame his temptress?
How does this help a wife or daughter that becomes a punching bag when it gets drunk out at night?
Where's the dire concenquences of such behavior? How are we stepping up support for those harmed?
Yea...I'd be more impressed with a program that had a plan of action attached and some legal TEETH to protect the innocent.
Give us more than a little talking point if you want us to buy in.