The Greens Creek Hecla mine on Admiralty Island is at a critical juncture in its development with the U.S. Forest Service which soon will make a decision to permit the deposit of mine tailings for the next 30 to 50 years, though the mine has a right to operate through the year 2095. This is a critical decision that entails an acid generating tailings dump that discharges copper, cadmium, mercury, lead, and cyanide — all highly toxic. The Forest Service acknowledges that the tailings dump and its water discharge into Hawk Inlet will have to be monitored and treated hundreds of years and possibly forever. That “forever” puts this decision in a truly long-term perspective that deserves serious log-term planning for operation and reclamation.
This decision deserves the best scientific information and design, as well as contingency plans if things go wrong, or the unexpected happens, again.
Friends of Admiralty Island has reviewed and commented on the recent Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) regarding this proposed expansion of tailings. Although the focus of our group is protecting the unique values of Admiralty Island, we fully recognize the right of the mine to exist and the critically important role it plays in the economy of Juneau and the region.
As many people are aware, the mining claims at Greens Creek pre-date the National Monument Wilderness status of the land surrounding the mine. Thus, the current footprint of the mine is wholly contained on non-wilderness lands. Hecla is seeking approval from the Forest Service to expand its mine tailings dump further into the National Monument, and bury more than 4,000 feet of salmon habitat in Tributary Creek (Alt. B). In fact, the alternative tailings site just outside the Monument boundary (C and D) call for the destruction of 1,078 feet of Flower Creek salmon habitat. This salmon habitat will be lost forever, despite claims that it can be recreated when mining has ended.
The DEIS has numerous shortcomings: It appears to have neglected several constraints for mining on National Monuments lands which Congress imposed in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act; the permanent loss of anadromous and resident fish habitat is essentially written off through a mitigation plan with questionable benefits; despite approval by EPA and DEC at the Pogo Mine, the DEIS failed to consider a demonstrated treatment alternative to increasing toxic discharges in a mixing zone in Hawk Inlet. The cultural values of Hawk Inlet are cursory, at best. We have asked that a supplement to the DEIS be prepared to correct these deficiencies to facilitate an informed response by the public and other agencies.
Our group is very concerned about these issues but also about the fact that the impacts of this mine will be a reality for local residents and the environment far beyond the life span of anyone reading this letter today. We would like to see a plan for expansion that works for the communities of Angoon, Hoonah and Juneau, Hecla Greens Creek mine and the Monument. Unfortunately the DEIS for the project fails in meeting this goal.
• Metcalf is president of the Friends of Admiralty Island Board of Directors and wrote this column on behalf of the board. The group was formed in 1997 to promote the protection of and advocate for educational and scientific research of Admiralty Island.





Comments (11)
Add commentGood shrimping in Hawk Inlet
Would these discharges threaten that? Or make consumption of the shrimp unhealthy?
Finally
Finally, a cogent and reasonable argument based on sound evidence and reasoning from a group seeking to protect the environment. This argument actually makes me want to see the Forest Service address the issues and determine the best possible alternative. Contrast that with the knee-jerk reactions from rabid environmentalists seeking to curtail resource development at the Pebble Mine. No reason, no evidence, and certainly no cogent argument based on anything other than emotion and a desire to punish resource developers at all costs.
Actually Jim, what I have
Actually Jim, what I have seen regarding Pebble is the developers ignoring the wishes of their neighbors, ignoring all science, environmental issues, basic common sense to get to rip billions out of Alaska and run away to their non-US home and file bankruptcy so we can clean up after them.
If pebble would actually come
If pebble would actually come to the table with a coherent plan that addressed the environmental issues, they might get a little more respect, but they are just screaming that they will do whatever they want. No, no you wont.
to answer lat58
Well, it just may be the 314 pounds of mercury, 53 pounds of cyanide and 196 toxic pounds of lead that they have dumped into Hawk Inlet just since 2005. Good shrimpin' buddy!
And the city?
Alaskaguy, would you mind providing us with the toxic discharge numbers into the ocean (even if under permit levels) for the City of Juneau?
I suspect Greens Creek pales in comparison.
Sure I could
And so could you. Just go to http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/.
I suspect CBJ has more than one permitted facility. But if your point is that "everyone is doing it" then you sound like my teenage daughter. If your point is to compare bad to very bad as some kind of justification, then I suspect you fell for "low tar" cigarettes as being somehow healthy. If your point is that pollution is necessary for continuous growth, then you have adopted the philosophy of cancer cells.
At the profits Hecla is making they could afford to remove the sulfate bearing rocks (and sell it for sulfuric acid production), do a better job protecting the environment, probably save money from not having to treat the water forever (if they ever really intend to) and still make a profit.
Missing the point...
Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
Of course everyone is doing it, but the more important question that I'm posing is why don't we focus our corrective efforts on the biggest magnitude problems first. Surely that's what you teach your teenage daughter -- how to prioritize.
If we as residents of Juneau, through our lifestyles and waste habits, own a larger pollution problem than Kensington or Greens Creek, then that's where we should be working.
false comparison
I teach my kids to think critically and recognize faulty logic.
The waste from cbj's treatment plants is primarily organic, fecal coliform, BOD, oil and grease, nitrate and nitrite, stuff nature to a great extent breaks down while the mine's waste stream is persistent bioaccumulative toxins such as lead, mercury and copper.
Could CBJ do a better job of treating the waste? Of course. You and I should be willing to pay for it. Should Hecla do a better job? Again, yes. And a company making $100 million in profits a quarter off of a publicly owned resource should pay for it also. The key is to require it. (off topic, but what are the chances that Hecla will be around "forever" to treat their waste, or will we be paying for that also.)
False comparison?
Thanks for the web address!
It is pretty shocking to look at the numbers, especially those that show the Juneau Wastewater Treatment Plant with non-compliance violations in 12 of the last 12 quarters, against Greens Creek's 4 in the last 12.
However, as you say, although smaller in number maybe the four mine discharges killed bunches of fish or something. Where could I find that information?
little tougher ask
As the DEIS states there is little to no data prior to the mine opening in 1989. There are many narrations from users in the area about the dramatic drop-off in salmon, crab, halibut and clams. The hawk Inlet monitoring reports (available on DNR's large mine permitting section web site) notes high levels of lead and mercury in many sediments and benthic organisms as well as fresh water resident fish in Greens Creek. The recent lack of halibut and crab are written off as due to the closure of the cannery without ever connecting the presence of cannery as an attractant and ignoring any other possibilities such as toxins discharged by the mine.
But in the same token that deaths due to cigarettes do not seem obvious because of the lag time, the "bunches of fish" you seek are not obvious, but there nonetheless. Cheers!