• Few clouds
  • 61°
    Few clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Are we deaf to the spirit of the American Revolution?

Posted: July 3, 2012 - 7:41pm  |  Updated: July 4, 2012 - 12:00am

Among the many grievances stated in America’s Declaration of Independence was that King George kept standing armies in the colonies without the consent of colonial legislatures. It was the period following the French and Indian War and the British claimed they needed to defend its colony from a possible French or Spanish invasion. To support their troops they imposed a tax on the colonists, one of many that helped trigger the American Revolution. But what if Britain had instead taxed itself and given those funds to the colonial governors to defend themselves?

Now that may seem like a purely academic question, but if we look to the political unrest in Egypt, we’ll see a standing army empowered by American taxes. We supported the 30-year tyranny of Hosni Mubarak with more than $30 billion. And in March the Obama administration released $1.3 billion more despite the new government’s crackdown on pro-democracy forces. Now Egyptian military leaders have dissolved the country’s parliament and taken complete control of legislative lawmaking power.

But let’s go back to the 18th century as seeds of our nation were being fertilized. A decade before the battles of Lexington and Concord, Sir William Blackstone published the “Commentaries on the Laws of England.” In one of its 110 chapters the English jurist argued that professional armies “ought not to be permitted in time of peace.” He warned that while the military was supposedly standing in defense of a state that wasn’t at war that they could just as readily be used to repress the peoples’ liberties.

The Commentaries laid the groundwork for the colonists’ complaints about King George’s army occupying American soil. And it significantly influenced the development of our Constitution. There are scholars who believe Blackstone’s treatise is at the heart of the Second Amendment. They contend that the founding fathers believed the most reliable assurance against a repressive government was an armed population. Indeed, that was exactly how they brought about the end to King George’s tyranny. But how many of them would have rebelled had they been bribed to lead a colonial army loyal to the crown?

It’s a formula our government has used to spread its imperial weight around the world. For over a quarter century we supplied Iran with weapons and training that helped the Shah repress his people. Not long after he was ousted from power we gave military aid to Saddam Hussein for Iraq to be our proxy in a war with Iran. And during the past decade we sent more than $3 billion to Pakistan, much of which supported the military rule of President Pervez Musharraf.

Now what would happen if our government began to curtail our liberties at home? The fact is the size and technological might of our military has made the right to bear arms irrelevant as a means of resistance today. And relative to the size of the federal government it’s getting larger every year. Yet Congress won’t touch the Department of Defense budget because both parties sheepishly argue that America has dangerous enemies it must defend against.

“The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home” James Madison said in a speech during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. In modern times it was Dwight Eisenhower who warned that “we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex.” Sadly we have enough military bases all over the country to make both former presidents roll over in their graves.

If Congress continues to slash everything in our federal government except the military, the president and the generals he commands could wind up with so much power that Congress will be as feeble as its aspiring counterpart in Egypt. Don’t expect our governor or legislators to lead a freedom rally though, at least not in the full spirit of our Declaration of Independence. They love the standing armies we have here. It seems in that regard their loyalty has been bought by the billions of defense dollars coming to Alaska. They’re ignoring the warnings of the last general we elected president. And they’re deaf to the voices of America’s revolutionary leaders.

• Moniak is a resident of Juneau.

  • Comment

Comments (9)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Lodestar
132
Points
Lodestar 07/04/12 - 07:07 am
6
3

The U.S. military would

The U.S. military would shrivel quickly against a populace armed lightly with sporting arms. That sounds absurd, but they are not logistically able to fight a war without the support of the folks at home. Heck just the mental battle has been tough with massive support at home (see the high suicide rates among our troops). The military could only plunder their way forward for so long as the shelves would be bare immediately. Then they would have to secure the means of production which would spread them far too thin and occupy them far too much. The 2nd ammendment is not now nor will ever become irrelevant. In fact were its spirit followed our arms would match theirs (local non government chartered militias had plenty of cannons).

The funniest part of the above piece to me was the question: "what would happen if our government began to curtail our liberties at home?" Have you missed the last few decades? Been busy with Facebook and your cell phone and video games?

Americans routinely crouch down and lick the hand that feeds them as Samuel Adams railed against. You see it in every airport, at every major event. You see it all over our land and in fact it's only getting incremetally worse.

Lines in the sand were passed many years ago that proved us all for what we are, me included. We should all hang our heads in shame today and occasionally glance up at the greats that gave us what we have so squandered into the dust.

Grendel
1118
Points
Grendel 07/04/12 - 09:38 am
2
4

Armies = Security

From the Brit perspective, those seditious colonials were getting a free lunch under the blanket of security the Empire provided after 7 yrs of British blood spilt booted the French out of North America, and THEN the tax burden at home (England, 1775) to pay for the colonists' security was worse than we bicker about today (2012). And those colonials were peeved at a tax on tea?

Also, the colonies BELONGED to the British Empire -- they were an ASSET for the Empire. No American wants a settlement in any part of the M-E.

Also, a standing army is prudent. Ask any Dutchman that made it out of WWII alive.

Finally, Happy 4th of July, year of Our Lord 2012, courtesy of your US Armed Forces.

Calypso
6882
Points
Calypso 07/04/12 - 01:26 pm
5
4

That's the beautiful thing

That's the beautiful thing about history, Rich. You have the privilege of hindsight and events can be spun and shaped as you wish them to have been, all depending on your ideology at present. Facts can so easily be discarded when one is trying to get a point across.

Words are funny things too. They actually have meanings but once again can be misused to suit ones ideology. For instance, this statement from you - "If Congress continues to slash everything in our federal government except the military"...

What has been "slashed"? And what percent is current military spending in relation to GDP and where does that stand historically?

And this statement - "Now what would happen if our government began to curtail our liberties at home?" That's exactly what just happened with the Obamacare decision but of course ideology gets in the way again. You see it one way, I see it another.

So, after reading your opinion piece, I'm not going to spend one minute pondering your angst about an all powerful military. I'm going to spend my time pondering an all powerful Commander in Chief that wants control over American citizens and seems to think Congress is already mostly irrelevant. I like to believe that our military would side with the citizens in our democratic republic.

Does "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" have any meaning to you?

concerned
573
Points
concerned 07/04/12 - 10:09 am
3
3

Does anyone else

Worry about the lack of a military presence in Haines or Skagway? The Canadians could take Southeast in mere hours closing down peril strait to all traffic and strangling commerce bringing us to our knees. Don't they scare everyone else.

Emitr
5
Points
Emitr 07/04/12 - 02:59 pm
3
4

We rebelled against a corporate monopoly

Britain and the British East India Company had a monopoly on the tea trade, and the American colonialists rebelled because of it. If we were all that keen on the spirit of the American revolution, we wouldn't tolerate the cahoots between the federal government and banking industry. Primarily the Republican party, but also the Democratic party, enable a financial plutocracy that Americans, were they at all interested in the spirit of independence, wouldn't tolerate. Anti-government rhetoric too often forgets that we the people should be the government and should rebel against the political powers and parties that defend the finance monopoly in the name of free enterprise and every other rhetorical canard. I suspect that most Americans, though, whether left or right, would support our military putting down a domestic rebellion against the Republican and Democratic cartels that have co-opted the American constitutional system.

wren
865
Points
wren 07/04/12 - 07:51 pm
1
5

in response...

This comment is rediculous!

"If Congress continues to slash everything in our federal government except the military, the president and the generals he commands could wind up with so much power that Congress will be as feeble as its aspiring counterpart in Egypt."

Socialist using propoganda, citing incidents of tyranny to try to prove a case which is not very well made. Federal government, constitutionally, should be downsized. As for standing armies, they should be reduced in size, advanced through technology, and utilized to protect OUR country.

Ron Paul 2012!!!

curmudgeon
323
Points
curmudgeon 07/04/12 - 10:02 pm
1
6

Thanks

Thanks again to Rich for saying what most folks won't say. A true patriot who's not afraid to protest the illegal actions of his government. And note that he's a veteran with a kid serving in the military.

Contrast that with the Repugnican anti-patriots who hate America and get rich by exporting American jobs overseas and allowing the import of underpriced foreign goods produced at a loss while supporting efforts to keep poor people, the elderly, and people of color from voting.

You know, those same folks that are trying to buy the coming election by spending their fortunes to smear honest candidates and elect their toadies to help them get even richer at our expense, overtaxing the middle class so they can get even more tax breaks.

madison89
1040
Points
madison89 07/05/12 - 06:42 am
2
2

Should have done some home

Unpublished

Should have done some home work Rich. You would be less likely to appear the fool to those of us that pay attention.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2012-07-02/defense-spending-...

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING