• Overcast
  • 59°
    Overcast
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

The measure of a civilization is how it treats its weakest members

Posted: August 5, 2012 - 12:10am

Mahatma Gandhi is reported to have said, “The measure of a civilization is how it treats its weakest members.” I have been impressed by how Gandhi’s words have been embodied in the dedicated work of so many people and organizations in Southeast Alaska that integrate adults and children with mental and physical disabilities into the life of the community.

In addition to providing children and adults with Down syndrome and other mental and physical disabilities with access to education, job training and housing - our schools, non-profits and volunteer groups work hard to insure their participation in a variety of community events such as concerts, plays, the Folk Festival, Special Olympics and other sports events and First Fridays. Last year there was even a film festival, featuring REACH clients who starred in short films they had written and directed. I am grateful that three out of seven placements for the Jesuit Volunteers who serve in our community are at agencies that assist and support our neighbors with mental and physical disabilities to live fulfilling and independent lives.

Juneau would be a poorer place without their active presence, participation and inclusion. But by way of contrast, I am troubled by the ways in which our larger society and culture choses to exclude children who have are diagnosed with Down syndrome and other disabilities before they are born.

I was shocked to learn that back in March a jury in Oregon awarded $2.9 million dollars to parents who sued for “wrongful birth” after their daughter was unexpectedly born with Down syndrome. The baby’s parents sued their medical provider for failing to detect during the pregnancy that their unborn child had this condition.

The mother said in court that if she had known that her daughter had Down syndrome she would have aborted the child (although she stated that she loves her disabled daughter who is now four years old.) She and her husband brought the lawsuit to compel the medical provider to pay for the additional costs over a lifetime of caring for their child.

The widespread practice of prenatal testing results in an estimated 90% of unborn children who test positive for Down syndrome being aborted (“Prenatal Test Puts Down Syndrome in Hard Focus” May 9, 2007 New York Times). New genetic tests will allow physicians to screen unborn babies for up to 3,500 genetic disorders (including not only Down syndrome, which strictly speaking is not a genetically heritable condition but is a mutation which can occur in any pregnancy) but mutations thought to play a role in autism and schizophrenia.

This scientific and medical achievement has the potential to provide additional information to physicians to aid their treatment of children with genetic disorders. However, it also raises disturbing moral and ethical questions. If the use of prenatal screening for Down syndrome is any indication, this new genetic test will inevitably lead to an even more widespread practice of aborting unborn children with suspected or confirmed undesired genetic traits.

I am pro-life and oppose the intentional taking of innocent human life in every circumstance. All of us should be alarmed by the misuse of new diagnostic technologies that make it easier to identify unborn children with Down syndrome and children with genetic anomalies. Based on what has happened with Down syndrome children, widespread use of these tests will most likely increase social and economic pressure on parents to abort children suspected to have genetic disorders. And these tests will normalize even more the use of abortion to select not only the sex of children (which is already widespread in many parts of the world) but for or against desired traits (from hair color to intelligence).

The practice of aborting children with traits that are deemed to be undesirable or to be burdensome undermines the human dignity of every person and unravels our bonds of solidarity with each other. Our human dignity, at its very foundation, rests on our shared and common humanity. Our worth and value as human beings is intrinsic. It is grounded not in our productivity, ability or status, but on our personhood. Because of our shared dignity as human beings, every person belongs, as a matter of right, to the human community, especially those who are dependent and vulnerable. Tragically, this is not yet the case in our society.

In an address to participants at an international symposium on Down syndrome, Pope John Paul II said, “The increasing use of selective abortion as a means of preventing the birth of handicapped children requires a firm response from Christians. In our search for genuine social progress, we can never ignore the law or God. The right answers to the problems our society is facing will always be marked by justice, respect for human dignity and the defense of the innocent lives of the vulnerable and the unborn.”

The admirable work of those who support and assist children and adults with disabilities is rooted in respect for their human dignity and in the passionate desire to include them as fully as possible in the life of the community. In this inclusion and care for those with disabilities we see the virtue of solidarity lived out among us and as a key measure of the civilization we hope to build together.

• Burns is the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Juneau and Southeast Alaska.

  • Comment

Comments (8)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
fisherwoman44
0
Points
fisherwoman44 08/05/12 - 08:14 am
7
3

Mostly Agreed

A first, Mr. Burns: I agree with much of this.

Not just Christians, but all people, need to recognize the road being taken by many, and be careful that our choices (and I am pro-choice) are made thoughtfully and in good conscious.

Pregnancy, childbirth and parenting are serious, important things. They should not be treated like a casino game by covering odds.

The great majority of pro-choice people do NOT support abortion as a type of birth control, but as a painful but sometimes necessary choice. It's just difficult to know where the line should be drawn.
It would seem that at some point you just need to have faith that the moral compass of an individual will show her what is the right thing to do.

aynrand
2867
Points
aynrand 08/05/12 - 04:21 pm
4
4

Pro Life

According to the Pope John Paul II's encyclical Humanae Vitae life begins at conception and ends with a "natural"death.

In order to pander to the Republican party the bishop never speaks out against capital punishment that undermines the human dignity of every person.

adcme9
335
Points
adcme9 08/05/12 - 06:04 pm
2
2

Whom will judge?

Bishop Burns says, "....respect for human dignity and the defense of the innocent lives of the vulnerable and the unborn.”

So, is it OK to take the life of the guilty? Is that a dog whistle that capitol punishment is OK?

MikeDziuba
738
Points
MikeDziuba 08/05/12 - 08:29 pm
4
3

Doublespeak of Olympic proportions

"I am pro-life and oppose the intentional taking of innocent human life in every circumstance."

Coughs, right, let's get to it.

Exodus 12:29, Yahweh killed all the firstborn of Egypt to show his strength.

Numbers 11:31-35, Yahweh killed an untold numbers of Israelites. Alleged crime: eating quails.

2 Kings 2:23-24. Yahweh killed 24 youths by sending a she-bear to maul them to death. Crime: the kids made fun of Elisha's bald head.

The bible is polluted with examples like these. It is not a paragon of morality. Yet, if I am to believe this letter, none of these lives were innocent. Not a single one. Not even those lives described in Psalm 137:9 whereby Yahweh blesses anyone who seizes your babies and bashes their heads against rocks. When is the last time you heard a homily on that verse?

Well, all I can say is it's apropos that a letter like this should arrive during the XXX Olympiad.

I declare the Mental Gymnastics open as well as the "High Horse" and "Moving The Goalposts" which are sure to follow.

Mike

ken dunker II
3339
Points
ken dunker II 08/05/12 - 10:17 pm
1
2

Really? Hair color, intelligence or gender?

Bishop Burns characterizes most of us by our our lowest common denominator: self.
I am for free will, perhaps the most important attribute of civilization.
To suggest we will resort to hair color, gender or intelligence is using fear-based logic which is best left up to the political strategists.

swimmergirl
4371
Points
swimmergirl 08/05/12 - 10:19 pm
3
2

Hmm.....a few thoughts.

First - the bishop, and all of his peers, speak as 'authorities' on this issue who will never, in fact, have to face this kind of choice. So how credible can his opinion (or theirs) be?

Second - If the church is so concerned about how it 'treats it's weakest members' - then why are they not wholeheartedly supporting the nuns who are saying they would rather help the poor than be involved in politics?

Again - freedom OF religion includes freedom FROM religion. The bishop's followers are free to exercise their choice. Please leave me - a non-religious person - equally free to exercise mine.

Mama T
2401
Points
Mama T 08/06/12 - 06:46 am
3
2

Treating healthcare as a commodity

The ability to care financially for special children falls disportionately upon women. Costs are skyrocketing. The right wants to force women into unmanagable situations and then withold aid. The catholic church does not want to add birth control to their insurance plans but says nothing about viagra's inclusion which could be partially responsible for unwanted pregnancy.

Double standards!

I'm not catholic and I want a choice.

justlivin
1486
Points
justlivin 08/06/12 - 12:31 pm
1
3

It is interesting that people take a few verses from the Bible

and use them to justify their beliefs when they do not believe in the Bible in the first place.

Exodus 12:29 God caused the death of the first born of the egyptians (human and animal) because of the pharoah's hardened heart. The death of the first born proved that Yahweh had power over the "gods" of Egypt.

Numbers 11:31-35 God struck down the Israelites because of their disobedience and discontentment (greed).

2 Kings 2:23-24 I am not sure why exactly this happened. By the way, it was 42 "young people" or "children". Because words translations vary, the exact age of the youths is not known. However, they were being disrecpectful of God's prophet. They knowingly ridiculed a prophet of God and suffered the consequences for it.

If you are going to use the Bible to justify why you do not believe there is a God, please read the context of the passages you use.

Now here comes the vitriol.......

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376903/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/372318/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359842/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376898/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376893/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376888/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376873/
Cardboard Boat Regatta

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING