In this year’s election cycle, perhaps now more than ever, Americans are being asked to choose between two paths – one leading decidedly left, the other bearing to the right. Partisan issues abound with debates over the size and role of the Federal government in the lives of Americans – whether we should expand entitlements and subsidies or grow business to restart our economy. One thing that isn’t under debate is the lack of available jobs in this country.
With U.S. unemployment holding persistently at 8+ percent for more than 43 months, and an August Bureau of Labor Statistics report that showed a disappointing 96,000 new jobs created last month with four job seekers dropping out of the market for every one who found a job, it is clear that America’s economy needs a boost. With November drawing closer, the national debate continues over how to stimulate economic growth – whether to spend or save our way out of debt. However, many are failing to address a major root cause of the problem – the 73,608-page Federal Income Tax Code, full of loopholes, contradictions and inequities that stymie business growth and polarize Americans into haves and have-nots.
For a growing number of Americans, it is becoming clear that the only solution is replacement of the current Federal Income Tax system with the FairTax®, a federal consumption-based tax on what individuals spend, not what they earn. The FairTax is a new, simple, transparent and totally equitable system of taxation that levels the economic playing field, and does away with the $13+ billion-a year IRS bureaucracy.
The FairTax (HR25/S13) is a comprehensive plan to replace federal income and payroll taxes, including personal, gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security/Medicare, self-employment and corporate taxes with a 23 percent consumption tax on new goods and services – no exceptions, exclusions or exemptions. Even so, the FairTax allows all Americans to consume what they see as the basic necessities of life free of tax.
It does this by providing a monthly tax rebate to all households to ensure that each family unit can consume tax free up to the poverty level, with the overall effect of making the FairTax progressive in application. For a family of four this tax rebate equals $6,960 per year. Included in the Plan is a constitutional amendment (HJR 16) that repeals the 16th Amendment and makes a federal income tax unconstitutional.
Last November, Americans for Fair Taxation (www.fairtax.org ) released estimated incremental revenue projections had the FairTax been in effect in 2009 and 2010. According to estimates developed by Dr. David Tuerck, Chairman of the Economics Department and Executive Director of the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University in Boston, the FairTax would have generated 171 billion more revenues in 2009 and $267 billion more in 2010 than the current federal income tax system demonstrating that the FairTax system would be a more stable and reliable revenue source than the income tax.
It is also important to note that the FairTax ends the triple taxation of Social Security and Medicare funds as they are under the income tax when payroll taxes are initially withheld; the withheld payroll taxes are counted as part of gross income for income tax purposes; and finally, when the promised benefits are finally received. With the FairTax, Social Security operates exactly as it does today, except it is funded from a broad-based, progressive national consumption tax versus a narrow, regressive payroll tax.
With the FairTax, consumers will pay the actual price of a product or service with no hidden taxes, and workers will keep 100 percent of the wages they earn. Additionally, the FairTax will eliminate the 15-25 percent cost disadvantage that manufacturers of American goods face when competing in international trade.
The FairTax slashes business compliance costs and eradicates the tax wedge that drives up the costs of U.S. goods both at home and overseas. Under the FairTax, imported and domestically produced goods incur the same U.S. tax. The FairTax removes all taxes on exports, restoring the international competitiveness of American manufacturers in the global marketplace, thereby further stimulating trade.
What all this means to America is a substantial increase in the growth of the U.S. economy, creating desperately needed jobs. Consider, for example, the plight of young Americans ages 18-29, 1.7 million of which have been jobless for the past year, the highest unemployment rate for that age group since World War II. This is a generation in danger of becoming a “lost generation,” jobless and without meaningful prospects to become productive, contributing members of our society and future leaders of American commerce. The FairTax provides hope for bringing hundreds of thousands of lost jobs back to all Americans, young and old.
Make no mistake – this is not a Democrat or a Republican issue – it is an American issue. And regardless of who sits in the Oval Office, the President and Congress owe it to America to support a culture of dedicated, hardworking people in this country with an expectation of making a fair wage for the work they do. Adopting the FairTax will go a long way towards ensuring the future competitiveness of our nation, our businesses and the people who call the United States of America their home.
• Leo Linbeck, Jr. wrote this column for Americans for Fair Taxation.





Comments (9)
Add commentI support a "flat tax", over
I support a "flat tax", over the "fair tax" plan. Primarily for the sake of simplicity.
No bureaucracy supporting the rebate system, the IRS would be reduced to a meer shadow of it's current size, & tens of billions of dollars would be saved in tax preparation cost.
Money that can be put to far more productive, job creating endeavors.
Please do not label it as a "fair tax."
Fair is a subjective term. Call it what it is, a consumptive tax. But that does not roll off the tongue as easy does it?
Not sure how the 'rebates' would work...
But it is how Europe can afford free health care.
This is a TERRIBLE idea!
What would happen to all those tax attorneys and accountants that the rich hire to find tax loopholes? And what about the hard workers at H&R Block? And the programmers at Turbotax? Not to mention the army of IRS agents?
All of these people will be out of jobs, increasing the jobless rate to, oh, 30% or something.
We need our tax structure to be MORE complicated, with MORE giveaways to big donors and lobbyists.
What is this guy thinking? Is he Canadian or something?
With the exception of the
With the exception of the IRS, most of the folk's you listed that will find their services no longer needed, are, as a general rule, intelligent, & well educated.
They will have little trouble finding, or creating new, productive opportunity's.
And question your "30%" figure.
Interesting Idea, No income
Interesting Idea,
No income or other taxes except a 23% sales tax on all new items.
After goggling for a few minutes…A problem with the tax is that the tax rate is really like 30% because…
“it’s tax inclusive, meaning it incorporates the amount of tax in the total from which the percentage is derived. If you read it as a normal sales tax (which is tax exclusive), it would be 30%. A $100 item (before Fair Tax) would have a $30 Fair Tax added; $30/$130 gives us 23%” http://www.theamateurfinancier.com/blog/the-problems-with-the-fair-tax/
It would definitely turn us all into saver instead of spenders and would probably mean a huge boom in the used and black market.
built to last
American durable products, and imports too, are generally designed for 3 to 5 yrs of service before they are overcome by technology or wear...if I buy a car in 2014 at 23% fairtax I'm going to drive it till the axles snap. Consumer habits will radically change, and who knows what that will do to industy and American jobs? Not that that's a bad thing, just an unknown.
complete nonsence
OK I'm a skeptic and according to the publications on Fair Tax always wrong simply becasue I do not believe their information. And more important is how these Fair Taxers profess their perfect plan accounts for every possible problem. Attention no plan is ever 100% perfect.
I've questioned how the Fair Tax would ever determine how much Social Security a person would earn under their plan. For if you do not track how much a person has earned than how would you ever determine what they might receive for SS. Apparently everyone would get the same regardless of prior incomes.
There are endless claims that this idea will end the IRS. Apparently there would be no-one who would ever fail to comply with collecting the 23% and submitting it to the Treasury. Nor would there be any black-market sales. Honesty by all is the basis of some part of the Fair Tax scheme.
As I see this the higher your income the better off you would be to spend your money outside the US. Certainly a high income person would have more spendable income to use outside the country than a lower income person. Again I'm told I'm wrong becasue high income earners spend more than low income earners. Well to a point they might. Honestly does anyone believe a person with some high level of income needs to spend it all in the US.
I say this: no-one ever dreamed up a tax plan that was not inherently better for some than for others. For taxes in themselves are not necessarily fair as they are used to pay for things you may or may not use or believe in.
Not for nothing.....
But if a family of 4 spends $500 a month on groceries, that eats up pretty much their entire "rebate".
@no road fugitive
a current supreme court case could change what you said about black market/ second hand goods. They are deciding whether to uphold a lower court ruling to change "first sale doctrine" in other words when you sell used items, you must pay a fee to the original builder of said item. Apple Ipad, yep pay apple the fee again if it is used. they are deciding this now.
Just wait...
Just wait till Obamacare kicks in. The IRS will not only be enforcing our grossly complicated tax codes but now they have to be the health care police. The IRS and the EPA are growing way beyond their original design and need to be refocused.