Christmas is always a good time to ponder our collective confusion between money and religion. This year it’s been prominently displayed in the advertising for Juneau Fest. It was described as six nights of celebrating the spirit of Christmas under the banner of “Free Giveaways – Over $25,000 in Gifts and Prizes...” But the claim by event organizers that it wasn’t part of their religious revival meetings deserves equal attention. Because that follows our cultural denial that money, materialism and the economy interfere with the true spirit of Christmas.
The Juneau Fest organizers may have claimed that the evening giveaway events were totally different from their morning religious gathering. But the evidence definitely suggests they intended to use it to lure people into their holy revival. Even as the events were underway the ministry’s website stated that while giving away gifts and prizes they’d be preaching to people “that Jesus is the reason for the season. Many will get blessed materially and, most importantly, many will receive the free Gift of Salvation..”
It’s hard to believe it’s possible to keep Christ in Christmas by “blessing” people materially with very expensive electronics games such as Xbox and Wii. These represent needless excess that also contradict the legendary spirit of St. Nicholas, who followed Christ’s teachings by using his wealth to give relief to the poor and needy.
But if we turn to another of Christ’s greatest ideals we’d recognize that criticizing any group for spinning such a lure is to cast the first stone without considering our own transgressions. And the difficult truth is that we’ve put our faith in a consumer driven economy which is dependent upon us acquiring more than we need. It’s become the accepted norm, and many of us and our government have been borrowing too much money to attain it.
Political historian Kevin Philips calls this borrowed prosperity. In his 2006 book titled American Theocracy he lays out how, since the mid 80s, our growing debt helped the financial, insurance and real estate sector overtake manufacturing as the main engine of economic growth. The problem is these businesses don’t create any tangible material wealth. They do little more than move money around.
Philips warned about the real estate bubble two years before it collapsed. It was fueled by low interest rates which increased mortgage lending by the nation’s banking industry. On the lower end of the borrowing ladder credit card lenders used tricks like cash back, airline miles, and zero introductory interest rates to entice us to borrow more. Our rapidly growing debt gave rise to financial instruments like debt/equity swaps which, without producing an ounce of goods or an hour of services, increased profits earned by trading on the stock market.
The economic gains generated by gimmicks derived from debt were never real. So when the bubble burst the banks were on the verge of collapse. Congress passed the first bailout legislation while George W. Bush was still president. Another bailout and large government stimulus bills were passed after Barack Obama took over the White House. Basically, the country tried to resolve its disastrous pile of debt on the private side by adding to the already unmanageable debt on the government side. It brought us to the so-called fiscal cliff by continuing the cycle of creating artificial wealth.
Of course it wasn’t always this way. America began with a simple, independent farming economy. Even after the industrial age ushered in the era of manufactured goods, American workers were still making products which served everyday life. But somewhere along the way the country shifted from a necessity-based economy to one where gimmicks became commonplace. It reached the utterly ridiculous in 1975 when the worthless idea of a pet rock turned an everyday advertiser into a millionaire in just six months. It’s gotten worse since then.
Yes, it’s the wrong religious message to mix material excess with the meaning of Christmas. And it’s wrong to entice people to join a religious ministry with such gimmicks. But the Juneau Fest organizers definitely aren’t alone for not being able to differentiate between the true religion of the season and the everyday artificial one that falls under the guise of our national economy.
• Moniak is a Juneau resident.





Comments (6)
Add commentReasonable analogy.
The "so called fiscal cliff" is exactly that. So called. A gimmick. A monicker for a situation that we have been in for a long time. The trendy new term was coined to bring a sense of urgency and fear to a complacent nation to goad us into higher taxation. Conversely, Juneau Fest takes the high road by it's Robin Hood approach of conning businesses to donate bait used to draw people to an evangelist's itineration...'er...revival. Still, it's a gimmick. Materialism, greed, security. All come from the same roots...fear. Both gimmicks are designed to separate us from our money. A win/win for both government and revivalist.
Interesting article
Rich, I find your article thought-provoking. I like your explanation that financial organizations or business don't produce any tangible material wealth. They do little more than move money around"... and in so doing, they skim off a profit and those involved in the business benefit from playing their game.
When I was a child, we played the game of "Monopoly". It was fun and we got "rich". We thought it was only a game for entertainment. Now I see that there are those playing that kind of game in real life and becoming wealthy, not by producing anything but by using every trick they can to win the game for themselves.
Too much blame placed on
Too much blame placed on private industry, Rich. You forgot to mention the politicians' roles in the "fiscal cliff" through regulations and rules heaped on financial institutions that were formulated and enacted in Congress.
It wasn't really just money being moved around - there was tangible real estate tied to each of those loans.
The housing bubble started under Clinton and the government agencies Freddie and Fannie fostered the agenda. Houses for all...
I wish that I'd invented Pet Rocks! Brilliant...
And it's not fair to single out religion as the only entity that uses enticement. What about our education system, the workplace, in your home with your own kids? It's human nature to want a "gift".
Then shouldn't Jesus be removed from Christmas?
That is to say, if, as the author states, it is "wrong to entice people to join a religious ministry with gimmicks" then doesn't it follow that the mother of all gimmicks (believe and gain eternal life) is also wrong?
I happen to celebrate Christmas traditions, but not because of the baby Jesus. Most Christmas traditions, in fact, have nothing to do with the baby Jesus.
Merry Xmas! :D
Safe: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLjHAzqqOm0&feature=player_embedded
Mike
Wmolson, thought provoking?
Moniak's pieces are nothing more than a fractured amalgamation of current events available on any web search pieced together with bits of poor wit. The result is something bordering a rant. My kids regularly produce significantly more succinct, thought provoking work in high school. I think his 'work' is a waste of the empire's editorial space.
Good points Rich
Good on you for acknowledging that a good chunk of "wealth" in our economy is artificial. It's a bubble, and bubbles are prone to bursting. Wealth does not mean moving numbers from one excel column to another. It means physical product that people need: food, energy, shelter, transportation infrastructure, etc.
Our culture embraces our consumer economy because we are buried with commercial advertisements. The average American watches 20,000+ televised commercials every year... Thus we buy crap we don't need ad infinitum to serve an ever-expanding consumer based economy dedicated to infinite growth in a world of finite resources. Our economy requires this behavior. And to put it bluntly, it is absolutely unsustainable.
On another note, thanks for mentioning our roots as a farm-based economy. Think about that for a minute. People working outside, producing something of value that everyone needs (food), people working hard with their hands and their brains. Now what is our food economy? De facto monopoly dominated by a few agribusiness giants who value mechanized monoculture over hard working rural residents who are willing to work but can't because they can't compete with ConAgra. Brilliant.