• Broken clouds
  • 59°
    Broken clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

My Turn: Energy policy 2013: Alaskans should look 'north the the future'

Posted: January 17, 2013 - 1:15am

The elections have ended and it is now time to shift from campaigning to governing. An impatient electorate will have big expectations from lawmakers to jump-start our sluggish economy and start creating jobs—fast. So how can they meet the challenge? In Alaska that path is to better tap into its robust supply of oil and gas.

Other energy-producing states including Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota and Nebraska are seeing impressive income and job growth gains mostly attributed to the growing demands for their rich commodities, including oil and gas.

An analysis by the Progressive Policy Institute notes that in 2011, four of the top ten non-financial companies investing in the U.S. were oil and gas companies that have invested a total of $28.3 billion domestically in 2011. It’s important to note that historically each $1 billion increase in investment is associated with an additional 22,300 jobs in the U.S. Thus, the $28.3 billion of investment by the four oil and gas companies may have produced over 600,000 new jobs in 2011.

For Alaska to tap into this recovery and growth, however, it must first reduce the tax and regulatory barriers that are putting the state behind others in the Lower 48 in energy production and economic growth.

Foremost among these burdensome tax policies is the dubiously named “Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES),” Alaska is racking up massive amounts of revenue that are anything but equitable. One oil company recently reported that from the time ACES was enacted to year-end 2011 that it paid approximately $16 billion in taxes and royalties to the state of Alaska — 60 percent more than it actually earned. Due to the aggressive “progressivity” feature of ACES, Alaska’s “equitable” marginal tax rate on oil company revenues at current oil prices has increased to over 80 percent on revenues above allowed deductions.

ACES combined with other tax, royalties, permitting and regulatory barriers have slowed investment, growth and jobs in energy production. Although there is investment on the North Slope as a result of the renewal process for the aging infrastructure, the growth in jobs associated with adding production and developing new reserves is down sharply. A recent survey by the Alaska Support Industry Alliance shows that the majority of their member companies report moving production and service related employees from the North Slope to Alberta, Texas or North Dakota.

According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Alaskan oil production has been on a downward trend compared to the sharp increase in production in the lower 48 U.S. states. For example, Alaskan oil production has fallen from 741,000 barrels a day (b/d) in 2006 to only 561,000 b/d in 2011, a drop of 24 percent. In contrast, North Dakota’s oil production has increased from 109,000 b/d to 419,000 over the same time period, an increase of 459 percent. (North Dakota’s much lower marginal tax rate per barrel on oil, about 55 percent, stands in sharp contrast to Alaska’s 80 percent.)

On a state level, the Alaska Legislature would be wise to revisit ACES and find a more sound approach to tax policy that will truly be equitable. Lawmakers should work to broaden its tax base, in lieu of relying on oil companies for almost 90 percent of state tax revenue. This would allow the state to lessen the tax burden on oil companies, which would in turn encourage them to make the kind of investments needed to reverse Alaska’s decline in oil production.

U.S. energy industry expansion is on a fast track to economic recovery and Alaska lawmakers have the resources right in their backyard. The right tax and regulatory reforms will lower the costs of capital for business and energy investment, reversing the state’s decline in oil production and setting it on an impressive economic and job growth phase. When it comes to energy policy, Alaska can be a true leader, prompting other states to look “North to the Future.”

• Thorning is Senior Vice President and Chief Economist for The American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF), a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization advocating tax, energy and regulatory policies that facilitate saving and investment, economic growth and job creation.

  • Comment

Comments (16)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
barnardj1
673
Points
barnardj1 01/17/13 - 08:14 am
7
4

Why is a Washington "think

Why is a Washington "think tank" interested in alaska's oil tax policy? Maybe because the "think tank" is really a lobbying arm for the oil industry, who is back in session grubbing for more of our money. Apparently the CEO's bonuses aren't big enough.

snagger
8488
Points
snagger 01/17/13 - 08:21 am
6
2

Back to the future...

I can't wait for Alaska to need and reimpose an income tax so I can feel like I'm actually paying for state government!

Banditrider
638
Points
Banditrider 01/17/13 - 08:41 am
3
8

Nice letter

Ah, its good to see logic and truth. The Feds are interested in Alaska policy because they don't want to see oil come from here. While other states have private lands on which to drill, most of Alaska is federally owned. Plus, the greenies want to shut down this state and make one giant preserve. The goal is to lock out humans and all human activity which they can disguise under the Endangered Species Act.

Latitude58
14742
Points
Latitude58 01/17/13 - 09:22 am
7
2

Google it

Funded by the Koch brothers and ExxonMobile. Their board of directors made up almost entirely of former republican politicians.

I still recommend Charmin - less irritating and abrasive.

kpawsuh
10144
Points
kpawsuh 01/17/13 - 09:47 am
4
4

I should try that. OK

I should try that. OK Parnell, I just cant do my job correctly or efficiently because of the govt taking too much money from me. I need a 2 billion dollar bailout...Whatcha say gov?

artpetersen
620
Points
artpetersen 01/17/13 - 09:48 am
4
2

Please explain

How is it that an oil company can pay, or would pay, "60% more in taxes and royalties than it actually earned"? That would mean this: the company earned 100% and paid the State of Alaska 60% beyond that. Or does the writer mean that of the 100% the company earned, the split was 60/40? If so, the state of Alaska received 16 billion and the oil company 10 billion, a tidy profit "earned" for the company. Why shouldn't Alaskans receive a larger percentage of their own unrenewable natural resource? ACES may need adjustment; the progressivity formula holds no additional reward for oil producers during boom times. It just seems right to remember who owns the oil.

El_Boorba
1503
Points
El_Boorba 01/17/13 - 10:06 am
6
3

Give me 2 billion a year!

I will hire 20,000 Alaskans to do cool things like teach kids, police the streets, shovel sidewalks, help old people, advance th culture, publish books, and all sorts of other wonderful things. Heck-we could have a airline that flies Alaskans around Alaska for free for that kind of money.

Will the oil companies hire 20,000 Alaskans with the $2,000,000,000 annual giveaway?

janwoodings
370
Points
janwoodings 01/17/13 - 10:36 am
6
1

Legislators duty is to

Legislators duty is to Alaskans and future Alaskans not to the rest of the US.

Calypso
6974
Points
Calypso 01/17/13 - 10:53 am
1
7

Stop the presses - Ken

Stop the presses - Ken Salazar and his cowboy hat are hanging it up as Sec. of the Interior!

Problem is, where might he pop up in the future and whom will be his replacement?

Huge kudos to Parnell for having the strength to wade through all the prattling from the southeast quadrant of his state! Settle down and sit quietly - he'll toss you a bone for some more capital projects or something, maybe.

Calypso
6974
Points
Calypso 01/17/13 - 10:58 am
1
6

@miss jan - my, my that's not

@miss jan - my, my that's not a very "global" attitude! I thought we were all in this together.

islander
1257
Points
islander 01/17/13 - 11:02 am
5
1

who is The American Council for Capital Formation?

I like to know who or what an organization is before I accept or reject an editorial by one of the big name staff of an organization. Well it the ACCF home page that tells you the priorities for this group is certainly not Alaska first nor are Alaskans part of their concerns.. I notice a particular self gratification when the mission statement reflect mostly an ongoing amount or praise for what they accomplished with little reference to what those accomplishments are. IMHO the AFFC is mostly another nifty name where the emphasis on the organization is to focus on economic growth alone (higher corporate profits through political influence.)

ima49er
5285
Points
ima49er 01/17/13 - 11:23 am
5
2

What a joke

Margo Thorning, doing a My Turn in Juneau's Empire.

Blah, blah blah......I'm for corporations and don't care about Alaskans, just want your natural resources and then we'll be on our way.

southeastfood
1283
Points
southeastfood 01/18/13 - 10:30 am
2
0

Misses the point

I appreciate that there are people looking out for rural residents of states like Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, etc., especially when it comes to finding ways to make a living. However, this letter misses the point. It shouldn't be considered economic genius to drum up the following plan: states in the Western U.S. have oil and gas resources. We should develop them immediately to create economic gains and jobs. Problem solved.

This plan is narrowly focused on the short term and pays no regard to the long term. These oil and gas resources are finite. There is a limited supply of them. Once they're gone, they're gone. So my question to Margo is: what happens once those resources are liquidated, and there are even more people living on this planet looking for jobs, energy resources, and economic gains? What's the plan for economic gains and job creation once we've run the oil and gas wells dry? If you want to talk about responsibility, then this question cannot be ignored.

Economic planning is not as simple as seeing Resource A and creating a plan to get that Resource out of the ground as quickly as possible. Smart investment planning should be more thoughtful, better understand how those resources can benefit more than just the present generation, and how the economic gains from those resources can be invested into our own future.

TheEyeOpener
428
Points
TheEyeOpener 01/19/13 - 09:31 am
0
0

Some further background

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Council_for_Capital_...

Links describing these organizations are just a search engine result away.

Xanti
14
Points
Xanti 01/22/13 - 02:59 am
0
0

I really like this

Several digital agencies will endeavor to sell you contemptible services, & the result is usually a cheap looking movement. indigomultimedia

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376903/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/372318/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359842/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376898/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376893/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376888/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376873/
Cardboard Boat Regatta

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING