Alaska Editorial: Pro-gunners have their own 'feel good' bills

This editorial first ran in the Anchorage Daily News:

 

Critics of gun-control advocates sometimes accuse them of advancing “feel-good” legislation that won’t make us any safer but lets them believe they’re doing something.

Could well be. One of the strongest arguments against an assault weapons sales ban is that it simply won’t make much difference, especially in the near future, because there are so many weapons in circulation in the United States now. They also argue that the 10-year ban that expired in 2004 did little to affect gun violence. Agree or not, it’s a practical argument that aims to deal in facts.

But the gun-control foes indulge in their own “feel-good” legislation — witness Alaska House Bills 55 and 69.

Rep. Bob Lynn’s HB 55 would allow school districts to decide for themselves if they want to arm teachers or others for school security. Actually, Alaska law already provides a more liberal guns-on-campus policy for officials than would Lynn’s bill. So as a practical matter Lynn’s bill is more reaction than substance. And if he’s serious about having trained people carry the firepower, he should read former prosecutor Val Van Brocklin’s Monday Compass that takes a real-world look at the issue.

Speaker Mike Chenault’s HB 69 is more ambitious and heavily dosed with “Don’t Tread on Me.” That bill declares that Alaska won’t be bound by any future federal restrictions on firearms like semiautomatic rifles, large-capacity magazines or anything resembling gun registration. Further, officers of the state would be authorized to arrest any federal agent trying to enforce such laws.

Any Alaskan banking on state protection in the face of a federal firearms violation would likely have his rights read and his hands cuffed before he could say “Long live Wayne LaPierre.” The constitutionality of such laws, including one already on the books that only applies to guns made in Alaska, is doubtful.

One bill wasn’t well-vetted, the other is a chest-thumper that probably wouldn’t survive its first legal challenge. Neither advances an intelligent debate about guns, rights and responsibilities.

House bills shed no light on way to wise gun laws or a safer Alaska.

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING

 

More

Sun, 09/24/2017 - 06:25

Grateful to have Anna Brown Ehlers in Juneau

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is the federal agency that works with states, territories, and other partners so all Americans enjoy and benefit... Read more

Sun, 09/24/2017 - 06:26

Mayor Koelsch: A yes vote for Prop. 1 — no excuses

Juneau’s citizenry is normally engaged on almost every topic and level. As mayor, I am often asked about my stance on particular issues — many... Read more

Sun, 09/24/2017 - 06:24

Executive privilege vs. privilege of public service

It was an act of generosity heard around the nation. The US News and World Report carried the story. As did the small towns of... Read more

Sun, 09/24/2017 - 06:21

Seniors need to help maintain city services

We are Juneau seniors, and we emphatically disagree with the call to eliminate all sales tax for seniors.

Read more