• Broken clouds
  • 39°
    Broken clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

My Turn: An opportunity to bring common sense to a federal program

Posted: January 30, 2013 - 1:02am

The Alaska House and Senate will hold hearings this week on Gov. Sean Parnell’s legislation to assume administration of the U.S. Corps of Engineers’ dredge and fill program.

The bureaucratic term for this action is “primacy.” I call it the last chance to bring common sense to a regulatory program—based on my experience with the Corps—which is a rat’s nest of rules, ad hoc imposition of requirements that are essentially “fast food law,” and is huge federal overreach triggered by a misguided court ruling in the mid-1970s.

The heart of the program is the definition of what constitutes the “waters of the United States.” Based on the 1970s precedent-setting court decision, and the Corps subsequent definition by rule of the definition of the “waters of the United States,” about the only thing that is exempt from the “U.S. waters” definition (and Corps regulation) is spitting in the desert.

My wife Lynn and I have a long, sad history of dealing with the Corps. It all began years ago when we purchased land along Skater’s Cabin road and wanted to haul in some fill material so we could build a house on our property.

We soon discovered that the lot we purchased was in a “wetlands” area and that the Corps had asserted jurisdiction over the wetlands portion of our property, even though the “wetlands” were created by a culvert which moved water from the north side of Skater’s Cabin road to our lot.

It was at this point that I knew we were in trouble. But being a good citizen, we applied for a Corps nationwide permit which is supposed to be the quickest route to golden prize: a freshly minted dredge and fill permit.

However, in an exchange of letters on the permit application with the Corps it soon became apparent that this was not going to be a simple or rapid process.

In one letter, the Corps noted the plethora of wildlife that supposedly resided or visited the area in which our lot was located and noted that we should take action to avoid disrupting these creatures.

It was at that point I probably made a huge mistake. I wrote a column on my experiences in dealing with the Corps and labeled it “praying for a permit.” The Empire published the column and in it I highlighted portions of the correspondence between the Corps and me, including the sections of a Corps letter which focused on the wildlife issue.

I noted in my response letter to the Corps that I was diligently searching our lot and the immediate area for the wildlife species noted in the Corps’ letters, but the only “wildlife” I had detected were those Juneauites who used the Skater’s Cabin area to host beer parties. However, I also noted, that in a detailed search of our lot—although I had not been successful in finding the wildlife noted in their letter — I was successful in finding a substantial quantity of dog droppings in the area. I didn’t receive a response from the Corps to this tidbit of information.

After much delay and loss of enamel on my teeth, we finally got the Corps permit to place fill material on our lot.

Our latest goat-rope with the Corps began about a year ago. Our family owns 19-acres at Wheeler Creek, which is located in a federal wilderness area on Admiralty Island. We can reach our property via our boat at a 13-foot tide and decided—for environmental and other reasons—that a gravel pad at creekside and a gravel trail to our cabin would be a worthwhile project to undertake.

The land from the Creek to our cabin is not what I would consider “wetlands” but knowing that I would be asking for trouble if I moved forward without applying for a Corps permit, I proceeded to take that route.

I hired a trails expert to lay out the trail and prepare the application for a Corps permit.

This expert is extremely knowledgeable of the Corps permit process and I have used his talent to assist my family in trail work at our Hand Troller Cove property.

This application process, using an expert to help me through the thickets of the Corps regulatory thicket, is not an inexpensive exercise.

Our expert compiled an impressive application package, and channeling Arlo Guthrie, was complete with glossy 8” x 10” color photographs and other supporting documentation.

Our expert submitted the application to the Corps on Jan. 15 of last year. On Feb. 3, the expert received confirmation that the Corps had received our application. Then followed dead silence for six weeks until I received a March 12 letter from the Corps proudly telling me that: “we have determined that your proposed project may involve work in and placement of dredged and/or fill material into the waters of the United States (U.S.) under our regulatory jurisdiction.” Duh!!

The Corps letter also dredged up (pardon the pun) a bunch of totally nonsensical requests for additional information, which in my opinion, was included in my permit application. While contemplating hari kari due to the Corps response, I did the next logical thing: I squealed “help” to the expert and “baloney” to the Corps.

Here’s the clincher.

My expert found a Corps’ reg that requires the agency to issue a nationwide permit if the Corps hasn’t issued a written response to the initial application within a 45-day period.

Hoo-ha, we got the “brass ring.”

But not before going through a huge expense in preparing the application, and then waiting for nearly two months waiting for a Corps response. And when we received the response, the Corps was requesting additional silly information related to the original application after their own regulatory deadline required them to issue me the permit.

I hope the Governor’s legislation finds its way through the House and Senate and ends up on his desk. The current Corps program is simply dysfunctional, does little or nothing to protect the environment, and is paperwork-generating machine.

A Corps program run by Alaskans is not only in the public interest, it simply makes good sense.

• Reinwand was Gov. Jay Hammond’s top aide during his second term and served in the same position for then-Senator Frank Murkowski in the senator’s Washington, D.C. office. Reinwand also served as Deputy Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation in both the Egan and Hammond administrations.

  • Comment

Comments (15)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Latitude58
14400
Points
Latitude58 01/30/13 - 08:21 am
5
5

Well Jerry

I hope you've completed all of your wetlands work at your numerous holdings now...

I've had some dealings with the local Corps as well and I've found them to be extraordinarily helpful and reasonable. And it helps to not be a jerk when you approach them. These local guys don't make the rules, they just try to help us navigate through them. Yeah, they're a government agency and plod through a bureaucratic process, but if you think the State won't impose its own bureaucracy on this program, well, you've been spending too much time in Washington or Colorado.

Your whining about your gravel path to your cabin... Chances are all of their resources were tied up dealing with the thorny permit issues for Kensington or Greens Creek. But you are demanding your permit for your recreational cabin trail in 45 days. Shall we talk priorities?

Your story about the wildlife at your Skater's Cabin property... You make a good point there. It's not the Corps who makes determinations about wildlife, that's not their field of expertise. They have to get wildlife input from the Fish & Wildlife agency...and the local F&W guys are anything but helpful or reasonable. I suspect that many times when people are having difficulties with the Corps, the real obstacles are the Fish & Wildlife guys in the background, and I'm not sure primacy will solve that problem.

skirkz
6683
Points
skirkz 01/30/13 - 08:35 am
3
5

Are you sure, Jerry?

I'm not persuaded that the Corps doesn't consider spitting in the desert to fall under their "wetlands" jurisdiction. Maybe not if the spitter is a foreigner who hasn't drunk any water in the US since his arrival.

kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 01/30/13 - 08:44 am
7
4

Could it be that the Corps is

Could it be that the Corps is charged with silly things like preserving the environment? But why let something silly like that interfere with some pompous arse getting to put a gravel path in to his 32nd play property? Sure wouldnt want to inconvenience you...

skirkz
6683
Points
skirkz 01/30/13 - 08:45 am
5
3

Lat.

Have you ever worked on large projects under Corps oversight? BLM? I didn't know about the 45 day rule. Makes me wonder if they don't stall the process on purpose so they don't miss their coffee break to do the extra paperwork. Something that should be noted: The Corps isn't just federal... It's military...

islander
1192
Points
islander 01/30/13 - 08:49 am
7
5

another unhappy politicaly connected insider

That is how I classify Mr. Reinwand. I'm probably right in believing this unhappy camper thought he was getting a super deal on the property and then became a disgruntled buyer after he bought without checking the status before he bought. I notice Mr Reinwand did not indicate when the land had been determined as wetlands but that he found out after he bought the land.

I'd predict the real issue is our politically connected writer believes his friends in Juneau can declassify his property from being wetlands into a more salable classification.

skirkz
6683
Points
skirkz 01/30/13 - 08:52 am
2
3

kp

Would you prefer to have Jerry and family trudge through muskeg and beat out a mud trail that will wash out prompting an alternate route...and another...and another...? Damn the environment! Can't have that pesky gravel covered culvert!

skirkz
6683
Points
skirkz 01/30/13 - 08:57 am
4
5

Private property, islander.

Federal overreach sucks, no matter how "connected" you are.

kpawsuh
10138
Points
kpawsuh 01/30/13 - 08:59 am
3
2

I find most of these projects

I find most of these projects to be more about the landowners snooty ideals than anything to do with their concern for the environment. I also find that they rarely give a honest and factual description. "All I want is to fill a tiny section for a hiking path" is in reality something like a two lane highway with turn out parking spaces and filling in a nice yard so his wife can plant pretty flowers. Usually the Corps has little issue with a simple little project like a gravel path. I suspect Jerry isnt being totally honest with us and there was more to it than he claims...

El_Boorba
1424
Points
El_Boorba 01/30/13 - 10:09 am
6
3

Must be nice to have all

Must be nice to have all those properties!

Sound like rich man's problems. "I want to build a house here, and one here, and one here... oh no, I have to get a permit! I'll hire an expert to help me."

Seems like a lot of cronies-er "homesteaders"-got all the land and if you were not connected you got snot.

barnardj1
657
Points
barnardj1 01/30/13 - 11:06 am
7
3

Jerry, my heart bleeds for

Jerry, my heart bleeds for you. The saddest story I have heard from an industry lobbyist in some time. Do you have any gray poupon to spare while you're at it?
In the real world, Parnell and allies doesn't want citizen involvement in development regulation. See killing the coastal zone management program. He wants all the regulation (or lack thereof) to be done by him.

Jumpstart
552
Points
Jumpstart 01/30/13 - 11:32 am
7
2

Public interest? Since when

Public interest? Since when was that a concern of Parnells?

This is NOT in the best interest of the public. Parnell does not represent or listen to the public. Parnell represents the oil, gas and mining industries, this is about relaxing standards for these industries and the regulations put in place to protect the public and our wildlife.
Parnell has done this over and over.

When "the public" voted for requiring the cruise line to meet higher discharge standards Parnell went behind our backs and overturned the publics vote. Parnell has done everything in his power to lower standards for polluting industries which IS NOT in the publics best interest.

Gov. Hammond would not agree with you , not for one second.
Shame on you Jerry.

islander
1192
Points
islander 01/30/13 - 12:19 pm
5
1

private property

skirkz the issue still remains: was the property designated a wetland before or after it was purchased?

Many individuals own wetlands as private lands. The chose to buy the wetlands as it gives them an already protected from developers. Organizations like Ducks Unlimited and various wildlife groups buy wetlands with the knowledge of the protection they get from development.

It is the buyers responsibility to know what they are buying before they lay their money down. Crying foul after the fact does not remove your bad choice unless there was some misrepresentation of outright fraud.

I spent two year dealing with a property the borough represented as outside a wetlands designated area boundaries. The borough had to finally pony up my investment as a refund when it was proven they had misrepresented the wetlands classification.

nottacheechako
471
Points
nottacheechako 01/30/13 - 02:05 pm
3
6

Give Jerry a break....

I happen to have had a close relative go through a very similar ordeal with the Corp here in Juneau just trying to clear a lot on the road system adjacent to other homes that have been in place for 25 years or so.

The topography and vegetation was identical, but man the BS that someone has to go through to cut a few trees and bring in some fill material is just over the top.

Job security for the Government employees to delay and delay, which just adds up to more costs for the private citizen trying to do everything by the book. The Corp is totally out of control with zero incentives to expedite anything for anyone from what I have seen. Just more of Obama's efforts to lock up the Tongass and shrink our population by making all development, whether it is commercial, industrial or residential, way more costly and time consuming than it should be.

El_Boorba
1424
Points
El_Boorba 01/30/13 - 02:31 pm
5
3

ACMP

So...

Wasn't this the same idea with the Alaska Coastal Management Program? You know, let the locals manage their coasts?

Why is this different? Oh yeah-it will make it easier for building roads, mines, and drill platforms. Hey-if it helps big bidness and your cronies-er "oldtimers"-then it must be good!

alaskabobc
3923
Points
alaskabobc 02/01/13 - 08:22 am
1
0

A proper action to take,

at the very least it puts the Feds on notice that their actions are far too heavy handed. It's a case of "Give Em an inch, and they want a mile" And while we are having this conversation, something needs to be done about the ESA, one of the most abused Fed regulations on the books!! IMHO

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376823/
Juneau Birds

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING